Environmental and genetic factors influence the liveweight of adult Merino and Border Leicester × Merino ewes across multiple sites and years

2016 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. 775 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. E. Blumer ◽  
G. E. Gardner ◽  
M. B. Ferguson ◽  
A. N. Thompson

Variation in liveweight change in the ewe flock during periods of poor nutrition can affect farm profitability through the effects of liveweight loss on potential stocking rate, management interventions including supplementary feeding, and ewe and lamb survival and productivity. There is variation between individual animals in their ability to manage periods of poor nutrition, but the links between liveweight change and breeding values in the adult ewe flock have not been quantified. We analysed 5216 liveweight profiles for 2772 ewes managed over 3 years at eight sites across Australia, to define the relative effects of environment, reproductive performance and breeding values on liveweight change. The range in liveweight loss varied from 1.3 kg to 21.6 kg, and for liveweight gain from 0.4 kg to 28.1 kg. Site and year had the largest influence on liveweight change, which demonstrates that seasonal conditions and management were the most important factors influencing liveweight change. Liveweight loss was influenced by previous and current reproductive performance but these effects were small in comparison to the effects of site and year. There were mixed associations with sire breeding values for growth, fat and muscle depending on site. An increase in sire breeding values for fat by 1 mm was associated with a reduction in liveweight loss by up to 1.3 kg regardless of ewe breed, and this was more evident at sites where ewes lost a greater proportion of their liveweight. While management had the greatest effect on liveweight change, there appears to be scope to use breeding values to select sheep that will lose less weight during periods of poor nutrition in some environments.

2015 ◽  
Vol 176 ◽  
pp. 22-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Getachew ◽  
S. Gizaw ◽  
M. Wurzinger ◽  
A. Haile ◽  
B. Rischkowsky ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 414
Author(s):  
Susan M. Robertson ◽  
Michael A. Friend

Management system has the potential to alter the reproductive output of sheep flocks and thereby farm profit. A study was conducted between 2006 and 2010 to evaluate the reproductive performance of four management systems with differing combinations of time of lambing, stocking rate and ram breed, while grazing at a similar midwinter stocking rate (dry-sheep equivalents per hectare of 8, 10.2, 13, 11.2 and 11.2 in the successive seasons 2006–2010). Three systems, winter lambing Merino (WLM), split lambing (SL) and later lambing (LL), grazed replicated farmlets comprising pastures that were 20% lucerne (Medicago sativa), 20% tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) and 60% phalaris (Phalaris aquatica). A fourth system (high lucerne (HL)) grazed farmlets of 40% lucerne, 15% tall fescue and 45% phalaris. All systems used Merino ewes: in WLM mated to Merino rams, lambing in July; in SL half of the ewes lambing to terminal-breed rams in July, the other half lambing to Merino rams in September; and in LL and HL lambed in September, half to terminal-breed and half to Merino rams. The number of lambs weaned per ewe joined was 10% higher (P < 0.05) in the WLM system (0.99 ± 0.03) than in the September-lambing systems LL and HL, largely a result of a higher number of fetuses per ewe and despite lower (P < 0.05) lamb survival to marking in some years. The SL system weaned a similar (P > 0.05) number of lambs per ewe (0.95 ± 0.03) to all other systems. However, the number of lambs weaned per hectare was least in WLM (4.6 ± 0.2), lower than in the HL and LL systems by 2.7 lambs/ha because of a lower stocking rate. The ranking of systems for fetal number and lamb survival was not consistent among years. Spring-lambing systems produced more lambs per hectare because of a higher stocking rate but fewer lambs per ewe than the WLM system. System differences in pregnancy rate, fecundity and lamb survival were not consistent between years.


1984 ◽  
Vol 24 (124) ◽  
pp. 47 ◽  
Author(s):  
JP Langlands ◽  
GE Donald ◽  
DR Paull

The reproductive performance of ewes subjected to four nutritional regimes from conception to 15 months of age was recorded from first lambing at 24 months until the seventh lambing. The ewes were grazed at 10 and 20 sheep/ha. The proportion of ewes which exhibited oestrus at their first mating was less in those which had grazed at a high stocking rate between 3 and 15 months, and fecundity was increased by 15% in subsequent years by a high plane of nutrition between conception and 3 months of age, but only when ewes were grazed at a low stocking rate as adults. Ewes stocked at 10 sheep/ha weaned 50% more lambs than ewes stocked at 20 sheep/ha in adult life, but the more heavily stocked ewes weaned approximately 33% more lambs on a unit area basis. Approximately half the variability in the number of lambs weaned per ewe available for service was associated with variability in lamb survival. Relationships between the proportion of ewes showing oestrus, fecundity, survival of lambs, overall reproductive performance and liveweight of ewes are presented.


2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 969-978 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peggy M. Kostakou ◽  
George Hatzigeorgiou ◽  
Vana Kolovou ◽  
Sophie Mavrogeni ◽  
Genovefa D. Kolovou

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. S798
Author(s):  
Till Andlauer ◽  
Thomas Mühleisen ◽  
Felix Hoffstaedter ◽  
Alexander Teumer ◽  
Anja Teuber ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 614-618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina K. Haston ◽  
Mary Corey ◽  
Lap-Chee Tsui

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 708-716 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew May ◽  
John M. Pettifor ◽  
Shane A. Norris ◽  
Michèle Ramsay ◽  
Zané Lombard

Crop Science ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yolanda López ◽  
Olin D. Smith ◽  
Scott A. Senseman ◽  
William L. Rooney

2011 ◽  
Vol 51 (11) ◽  
pp. 982 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey Saul ◽  
Gavin Kearney ◽  
Dion Borg

Two pasture systems (Typical, Upgraded) were compared at five on-farm sites across south-western Victoria between 1990 and 1996. The Typical pasture treatment mimicked the pastures common in the region, with volunteer annual-based species fertilised with ~5 kg/ha.year phosphorus (P). The Upgraded pasture treatment was sown to phalaris, perennial ryegrass and subterranean clover using cultivars recommended for the particular area. Higher rates of fertiliser (13–25 kg/ha.year P) plus other nutrients were applied. Both pastures were set-stocked with breeding ewes. The stocking rate on the Typical treatments was based on normal farm practice. Initially, the stocking rate of the Upgraded pastures was 15% higher than the Typical pastures and increased over time depending if the ewes in the Upgraded pastures were heavier than those in the Typical pastures. Measurements included pasture growth, composition and persistence, ewe stocking rates, ewe and lamb liveweights and condition scores, lambing, marking and weaning percentages, fleece characteristics and supplementary feeding. Over the 6 years, the average carrying capacity of the Upgraded pastures was 18.0 DSE (Dry Sheep Equivalents)/ha compared with 10.2 DSE/ha on the Typical pastures (P < 0.001). As well, the ewes on the Upgraded pastures were 2–3 kg heavier (P < 0.001) and 0.3 condition score higher (P < 0.001) than those on the Typical pastures. Ewes grazing the Upgraded pastures cut significantly more wool per head (4.8 versus 4.5 kg) of higher micron wool (23.1 versus 22.6 um, P < 0.001) but with similar yield and strength. There was no difference in the supplementary feeding required on the treatments. Ewes grazing Upgraded pastures had significantly higher lambing (116 versus 102%), marking (86 versus 81%) and weaning percentages (84 versus 79%) and weaned significantly heavier lambs (23.6 versus 22.6 kg) than those on Typical pastures. There was less feed on offer (P < 0.05) in the Upgraded pastures compared with the Typical pastures in autumn–winter but similar or higher levels in spring and summer. Gross margins using current costs and prices were $20 and $24/DSE for the Typical and Upgraded pastures, respectively. These values were used in a discounted cash flow analysis to determine the long-term benefits of the treatments. Assuming a 12-year life for the pasture, the internal rate of return was 27% with the breakeven point in Year 7. Treatment and ewe condition score significantly influenced lambing percentage with ewes in condition score 3.0 at joining having a lambing percentage of 111% compared with 95% if at condition score 2.3. Irrespective of condition score, ewes grazing Upgraded pastures had a 7% higher lambing percentage than those grazing the Typical pastures. Ewe condition score and lambing time significantly affected weaning weight. Lambs born to ewes in condition score 2.3 during pregnancy and lambing in autumn, reached only 32% of mature ewe liveweight at weaning whereas lambs from ewes at condition score 3.0 achieved 51% of mature weight by weaning.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document