BARROW ISLAND OIL FIELD

1999 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 158 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.K. Ellis ◽  
A. Pitchford ◽  
R.H. Bruce
Keyword(s):  
Lower Cretaceous ◽  
Middle Jurassic ◽  
Upper Cretaceous ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Water Source ◽  
Upper Jurassic ◽  
Hydrocarbon Reservoirs ◽  
Oil Field ◽  
Injection Wells

The Barrow Island Field in the Barrow Sub-basin of the Carnarvon Basin was discovered in 1964 by West Australian Petroleum Pty Limited. It is the largest oil field in Western Australia. Appraisal drilling has defined in-place oil of 200 GL (1,250 MMBBL) and in-place gas of 16.5 Gm3 (580 BCF) primarily in the Lower Cretaceous Windalia Sand Member of the Muderong Shale and in- place gas of 14.5 Gm3 (515 BCF) in Middle Jurassic Biggada Formation. Additional hydrocarbon reservoirs have been discovered, including oil and gas in the Upper Jurassic Dupuy Formation, the Lower Cretaceous Malouet Formation, Flacourt Formation and Tunney Member, Mardie Greensand Member and M zones of the Muderong Shale and in the Upper Cretaceous Gearle Siltstone. Approximately 850 wells have been drilled to appraise and develop these accumulations, and to provide water source and water injection wells to enhance recovery. Production commenced in December 1966, with the first shipment of oil in April 1967. Although numerous hydrocarbon reservoirs have been developed, 95% of the 44 GL (278 MMBBL) of produced oil has been from the Windalia Sand.Structural development of the Barrow Island anticline occurred initially during the Middle Jurassic and continued intermittently during the Cretaceous and Tertiary. Initial charging of the Dupuy and Malouet formations with oil from the Upper Jurassic Dingo Claystone occurred in the Early Cretaceous prior to the development of the shallower closures. Periodic wrench- related movement on the Barrow Fault during the Early to Late Cretaceous produced closures at the Lower Cretaceous reservoirs and provided a catalyst for oil migration and charging of these closures. Significant amounts of an extremely biodegraded component, and several less biodegraded phases are present in the oil in the Windalia Sand, indicating several phases of oil charging of the Barrow structure from Middle and Upper Jurassic sediments. In the Tertiary, gas sourced from Triassic and Jurassic sediments migrated into the Barrow structure via a dilated Barrow Fault, charged the Middle Jurassic Biggada Formation and displaced some of the oil in the Lower Cretaceous reservoirs.

GEOLOGY OF BARROW ISLAND OIL FIELD

1973 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith Crank
Keyword(s):  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Water Source ◽  
Upper Jurassic ◽  
Oil Field ◽  
Late Triassic ◽  
Low Permeability ◽  
High Porosity ◽  
The South ◽  
The North

The Barrow Island oil field, which was discovered by the drilling of Barrow 1 in 1964, was declared commercial in 1966. Since then 520 wells have been drilled in the development of this field which has resulted in 309 Windalia Sand oil producers (from about 2200 feet), eight Muderong Greensand oil wells (2800 feet), five Neocomian/Upper Jurassic gas and oil producers (6200 to 6700 feet), eight Barrow Group water source wells and 157 water injection wells.Production averages 41,200 barrels of oil per day, and 98% of this comes from the shallow Windalia Sand Member of Cretaceous (Aptian to Albian) age. These reserves are contained in a broad north-plunging nose truncated to the south by a major down-to-the-south fault. The anticline is thought to have been formed initially from a basement uplift during Late Triassic to Early Jurassic time. Subsequent periods of deposition, uplift and erosion have continued into the Tertiary and modified the structure to its present form. The known sedimentary section on Barrow Island ranges from Late Jurassic to Miocene.The Neocomian/Jurassic accumulations are small and irregular and are not thought to be commercial in themselves. The Muderong Greensand pool is also a limited, low permeability reservoir. Migration of hydrocarbons is thought to have occurred mainly in the Tertiary as major arching did not take place until very late in the Cretaceous or early in the Palaeocene.The Windalia Sand reservoir is a high porosity, low permeability sand which is found only on Barrow Island. One of the most unusual features of this reservoir is the presence of a perched gas cap. Apparently the entire sand was originally saturated with oil, and gas subsequently moved upstructure from the north, displacing it. This movement was probably obstructed by randomly-located permeability barriers.

The Beryl Field, Block 9/13, UK North Sea

1991 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. A. Knutson ◽  
I. C. Munro
Keyword(s):  
North Sea ◽  
Middle Jurassic ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Upper Jurassic ◽  
Lower Jurassic ◽  
Gas Production ◽  
Upper Triassic ◽  
Oil Field ◽  
Oil And Gas Production ◽  
The North

AbstractThe Beryl Field, the sixth largest oil field in the UK sector of the North Sea, is located within Block 9/13 in the west-central part of the Viking Graben. The block was awarded in 1971 to a Mobil operated partnership and the 9/13-1 discovery well was drilled in 1972. The Beryl A platform was emplaced in 1975 and the Beryl B platform in 1983. To date, ninety-five wells have been drilled in the field, and drilling activity is anticipated into the mid-1990s.Commercial hydrocarbons occur in sandstone reservoirs ranging in age from Upper Triassic to Upper Jurassic. Structurally, the field consists of a NNE orientated horst in the Beryl A area and westward tilted fault blocks in the Beryl B area. The area is highly faulted and complicated by two major and four minor unconformities. The seal is provided by Upper Jurassic shales and Upper Cretaceous marls.There are three prospective sedimentary sections in the Beryl Field ranked in importance as follows: the Middle Jurassic coastal deltaic sediments, the Upper Triassic to Lower Jurassic continental and marine sediments, and the Upper Jurassic turbidites. The total ultimate recovery of the field is about 800 MMBBL oil and 1.6 TCF gas. As of December 1989, the field has produced nearly 430 MMBBL oil (primarily from the Middle Jurassic Beryl Formation), or about 50% of the ultimate recovery. Gas sales are scheduled to begin in the early 1990s. Oil and gas production is forecast until licence expiration in 2018.The Beryl Fields is located 215 miles northeast of Aberdeen, about 7 miles from the United Kingdom-Norwegian boundary. The field lies within Block 9/13 and covers and area of approximately 12 000 acres in water depths ranging from 350-400 ft. Block 9/13 contains several hydrocarbon-bearing structures, of which the Beryl Fields is the largest (Fig. 1). The field is subdivided into two producing areas: the Beryl Alpha area which includes the initial discovery well, and the Beryl Bravo area located to the north. The estimated of oil originally in place is 1400 MMBBL for Beryl A and 700 MMBBL for Beryl B. The fiel has combined gas in place of 2.8 TCF, consisting primarily of solution gas. Hydrocarbon accumulations occur in six reservoir horizons ranging in age from Upper Triassic to Upper Jurassic. The Middle Jurassic (Bathonian to Callovian) age Beryl Formation is the main reservoir unit and contains 78% of the total ultimate recovery.The field was named after Beryl Solomon, the wife of Charles Solomon, who was president of Mobil Europe in 1972 when the field was discovered. The satellite fields in Block 9/13 (Nevis, Ness and Linnhe) are named after Scottish lochs.

scholarly journals Generation, migration, accumulation, and dissipation of oil in Northern Iraq

GeoArabia ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 39-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.V. Dunnington
Keyword(s):  
Lower Cretaceous ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Upper Cretaceous ◽  
Upper Jurassic ◽  
Oil Field ◽  
Lateral Migration ◽  
Upward Migration ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Northern Iraq ◽  
Late Tertiary

ABSTRACT Most of the known oil accumulations of Northern Iraq probably originated by upward migration from earlier, deeper accumulations which were initially housed in stratigraphic or long-established structural traps, and which are now largely depleted. The earlier concentrations had their source in basinal sediments, into which the porous, primary-reservoir limestones pass at modest distances east of the present fields. Development of the region favored lateral migration from different basinal areas of Upper Jurassic and Lower-Middle Cretaceous time into different areas of primary accumulation. Important factors affecting primary accumulation included: (1) early emergence and porosity improvement of the reservoir limestones, followed by burial under seal-capable sediments; (2) the timely imposition of heavy and increasing depositional loads on the source sediments, and the progressive marginward advance of such loads; (3) progressive steepening of gradients trending upward from source to accumulation area; (4) limitation of the reservoir formations on the up-dip margin by truncation or by porosity trap conditions. In late Tertiary time, large-scale folding caused adjustments within the primary reservoirs, and associated fracturing permitted eventual escape to higher limestone reservoirs, or to dissipation at surface. The sulfurous, non-commercial crudes of Miocene and Upper Cretaceous reservoirs in the Qaiyarah area are thought to stem from basinal radiolarian Upper Jurassic sediments, which lie down dip, a few tens of miles east of these fields. Upper Cretaceous oils of Ain Zalah and Butmah drained upward from primary accumulations in Middle Cretaceous limestones, which were filled from basinal sediments of Lower Cretaceous age situated in a localized trough a few miles northeast of these structures. The huge Kirkuk accumulation, now housed in Eocene-Oligocene limestones, ascended from a precedent accumulation in porous Middle-Lower Cretaceous limestones, which drew its oil from globigerinal-radiolarian shales and limestones of the contemporaneous basin, a short distance east of the present field limits. Eocene-Oligocene globigerinal sediments, considered by some the obvious source material for Kirkuk oil, seemingly provided little or no part of the present accumulation. The reservoir formation may have been filled from these sources, to lose its oil by surface dissipation during the erosional episode preceding Lower Fars deposition. Upper Cretaceous basinal sediments probably contributed nothing to known oil field accumulations, though they may have subscribed to the spectacular impregnations of some exposed, Upper Cretaceous reef-type limestones. Neither Miocene nor pre-Upper Jurassic sediments have played any discernible role in providing oil to any producing field. Indigenous oils are thought to be negligible in the limestone-reservoir formations considered.

Northwest Hutton Field, Block 211/27, UK North Sea

1991 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 145-151 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
North Sea ◽  
Middle Jurassic ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Oil Field ◽  
Injection Wells ◽  
Jacket Platform ◽  
Steel Jacket ◽  
Western Flank ◽  
Average Porosity ◽  
Reservoir Sandstones

AbstractThe Northwest Hutton oil field lies in the East Shetland Basin entirely within UK Block 211/27. It was discovered by the Amoco Group 211/27-3 well in April 1975 and is operated by Amoco (UK) Exploration Company. The structure is a series of tilted fault blocks. The reservoir sandstones are the Brent Group Sandstones of Middle Jurassic age deposited in a progradational deltaic environment. The Brent Group sandstones vary in thickness from 320-500 ft over the field. Average porosity ranges from 20% at the crest of the structure to 13% on the western flank with permeability decreasing from an average of 267 md to 1 md. Recoverable oil is estimated to be 145 MMBBL. A total of 26 producing and 9 water injection wells have been drilled from a single steel jacket platform. Production peaked in May 1983 at 86 680 BOPD.

Sequence stratigraphy of source and reservoir rocks in the Upper Permian and Jurassic of Jameson Land, East Greenland

1998 ◽  
pp. 43-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars Stemmerik ◽  
Gregers Dam ◽  
Nanna Noe-Nygaard ◽  
Stefan Piasecki ◽  
Finn Surlyk
Keyword(s):  
Sequence Stratigraphy ◽  
Middle Jurassic ◽  
Sedimentary Basins ◽  
Upper Jurassic ◽  
Oil Field ◽  
Source Rocks ◽  
Upper Permian ◽  
Shallow Marine ◽  
East Greenland ◽  
Reservoir Rocks

NOTE: This article was published in a former series of GEUS Bulletin. Please use the original series name when citing this article, for example: Stemmerik, L., Dam, G., Noe-Nygaard, N., Piasecki, S., & Surlyk, F. (1998). Sequence stratigraphy of source and reservoir rocks in the Upper Permian and Jurassic of Jameson Land, East Greenland. Geology of Greenland Survey Bulletin, 180, 43-54. https://doi.org/10.34194/ggub.v180.5085 _______________ Approximately half of the hydrocarbons discovered in the North Atlantic petroleum provinces are found in sandstones of latest Triassic – Jurassic age with the Middle Jurassic Brent Group, and its correlatives, being the economically most important reservoir unit accounting for approximately 25% of the reserves. Hydrocarbons in these reservoirs are generated mainly from the Upper Jurassic Kimmeridge Clay and its correlatives with additional contributions from Middle Jurassic coal, Lower Jurassic marine shales and Devonian lacustrine shales. Equivalents to these deeply buried rocks crop out in the well-exposed sedimentary basins of East Greenland where more detailed studies are possible and these basins are frequently used for analogue studies (Fig. 1). Investigations in East Greenland have documented four major organic-rich shale units which are potential source rocks for hydrocarbons. They include marine shales of the Upper Permian Ravnefjeld Formation (Fig. 2), the Middle Jurassic Sortehat Formation and the Upper Jurassic Hareelv Formation (Fig. 4) and lacustrine shales of the uppermost Triassic – lowermost Jurassic Kap Stewart Group (Fig. 3; Surlyk et al. 1986b; Dam & Christiansen 1990; Christiansen et al. 1992, 1993; Dam et al. 1995; Krabbe 1996). Potential reservoir units include Upper Permian shallow marine platform and build-up carbonates of the Wegener Halvø Formation, lacustrine sandstones of the Rhaetian–Sinemurian Kap Stewart Group and marine sandstones of the Pliensbachian–Aalenian Neill Klinter Group, the Upper Bajocian – Callovian Pelion Formation and Upper Oxfordian – Kimmeridgian Hareelv Formation (Figs 2–4; Christiansen et al. 1992). The Jurassic sandstones of Jameson Land are well known as excellent analogues for hydrocarbon reservoirs in the northern North Sea and offshore mid-Norway. The best documented examples are the turbidite sands of the Hareelv Formation as an analogue for the Magnus oil field and the many Paleogene oil and gas fields, the shallow marine Pelion Formation as an analogue for the Brent Group in the Viking Graben and correlative Garn Group of the Norwegian Shelf, the Neill Klinter Group as an analogue for the Tilje, Ror, Ile and Not Formations and the Kap Stewart Group for the Åre Formation (Surlyk 1987, 1991; Dam & Surlyk 1995; Dam et al. 1995; Surlyk & Noe-Nygaard 1995; Engkilde & Surlyk in press). The presence of pre-Late Jurassic source rocks in Jameson Land suggests the presence of correlative source rocks offshore mid-Norway where the Upper Jurassic source rocks are not sufficiently deeply buried to generate hydrocarbons. The Upper Permian Ravnefjeld Formation in particular provides a useful source rock analogue both there and in more distant areas such as the Barents Sea. The present paper is a summary of a research project supported by the Danish Ministry of Environment and Energy (Piasecki et al. 1994). The aim of the project is to improve our understanding of the distribution of source and reservoir rocks by the application of sequence stratigraphy to the basin analysis. We have focused on the Upper Permian and uppermost Triassic– Jurassic successions where the presence of source and reservoir rocks are well documented from previous studies. Field work during the summer of 1993 included biostratigraphic, sedimentological and sequence stratigraphic studies of selected time slices and was supplemented by drilling of 11 shallow cores (Piasecki et al. 1994). The results so far arising from this work are collected in Piasecki et al. (1997), and the present summary highlights the petroleum-related implications.

scholarly journals KEROGEN TYPES OF BAZHENOV FORMATION BASED ON PYROLYSIS DATA AND THEIR COMPARISON WITH OIL PARAMETERS

2017 ◽  
pp. 34-43
Author(s):  
E. E. Oksenoyd ◽  
V. A. Volkov ◽  
E. V. Oleynik ◽  
G. P. Myasnikova
Keyword(s):  
Organic Matter ◽  
Lower Cretaceous ◽  
Alternative Model ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Upper Jurassic ◽  
Gas Content ◽  
Basin Modeling ◽  
Bazhenov Formation ◽  
Gas Bearing

Based on pyrolytic data (3 995 samples from 208 wells) organic matter types of Bazhenov Formation are identified in the central part of Western Siberian basin. Zones of kerogen types I, II, III and mixed I-II and II-III are mapped. Content of sulfur, paraffins, resins and asphaltenes, viscosity, density, temperature and gas content in oils from Upper Jurassic and Lower Cretaceous sediments (3 806 oil pools) are mapped. Oil gradations are identified and distributed. The alternative model of zones of kerogen II and IIS types is presented. The established distributions of organic matter types can be used in basin modeling and in assessment of oil-and-gas bearing prospects.

scholarly journals Application of the CL-systems technology for water injection wells at an oil and gas field

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 848-853
Author(s):  
Liliya Saychenko ◽  
Radharkrishnan Karantharath
Keyword(s):  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Water Injection ◽  
Oil And Gas Industry ◽  
Field Studies ◽  
High Water ◽  
Injection Wells ◽  
Gas Field ◽  
Water Breakthrough ◽  
Oil And Gas Field ◽  
High Water Cut

To date, the development of the oil and gas industry can be characterized by a decline in the efficiency of the development of hydrocarbon deposits. High water cut-off is often caused by water breaking through a highly permeable reservoir interval, which often leads to the shutdown of wells due to the unprofitability of their further operation. In this paper, the application of straightening the profile log technology for injection wells of the Muravlenkovsky oil and gas field is justified. In the course of this work, the results of field studies are systematized. The reasons for water breakthrough were determined, and the main ways of filtration of the injected water were identified using tracer surveys. The use of CL-systems technology based on polyacrylamide and chromium acetate is recommended. The forecast of the estimated additional oil produced was made.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document