USE OF HEAVY MINERAL SUITES IN RESERVOIR SAND STUDIES IN THE HARRIET FIELD, BARROW SUB-BASIN, WESTERN AUSTRALIA

1992 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 359
Author(s):  
John Scott ◽  
Pete Di Bona ◽  
Vincent Beales

Analysis of the heavy mineral suites in the reservoir at Harriet Field has significantly improved reservoir unit definition and correlation and provided information on facies changes and diagenetic history. It has provided further evidence for a stratigraphic barrier as a cause of the variation of the oil-water contact in the field.The reservoir consists of a number of discrete sandstone bodies which are arranged in a multistorey manner.The reservoir is further subdivided into compartments by minor faulting. Prior to the use of heavy mineral analysis, correlation between wells was often unclear. Such correlation is beyond the resolution of reflection seismology and the massive nature of the sandstones means that definition and correlation is uncertain when made on the basis of lithology combined with wireline logs. The time interval involved in the deposition of the reservoir sequence is too short to permit discrimination by palaeontological analysis.Eight distinct sandstone bodies can be defined on the basis of analysis of the heavy mineral suites in the 14 wells of the field. The total composition of the suites, certain 'marker minerals' and various statistical indices have been used to define these sandstone units which are interpreted to be individual lobes within a submarine fan complex. The methods and results are illustrated with examples from the field. The results of the analysis show that heavy mineral populations can provide critical information for accurate reservoir mapping and analysis.

We present a model that explains the patterns of sandstone burial diagenesis in certain oil reservoirs, in which petroleum migration and burial cementation were synchronous. The coincidence of these two processes controls the chemistry and distribution of major burial cement phases across the field, which in turn controls the distribution of reservoir quality, causing a rapid decline of porosity and permeability with depth. Such a rapid poroperm deterioration is observed in many North Sea sandstone oilfields; we highlight the Magnus Sandstone Member of the Magnus Oilfield, northern North Sea as a type example of such a reservoir. The two most significant elements of the synchronous cementation and migration model are that burial cementation in the reservoir occurs over a restricted time interval, probably less than 10 Ma and that rapid and widespread fluid circulation is not invoked to explain the concentrations of cements observed. We speculate that cementation takes place at, and in a series of zones below, the oil-water contact which descends as oil fills the reservoir, with little change to the bulk chemistry of the reservoir formation waters through time.


2003 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 183-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith J. Fletcher

abstractThe Central Brae Oilfield is the smallest of three Upper Jurassic fields being developed in UK, Block 16/07a. The field was discovered in 1976 and commended production in September 1989 through a sub-sea template tied back to the Brae 'A' platform in the South Brae Oilfield. The field Stooip is 244 MMBBLs, and by May 1999 cumulative exports of oil and NGL reached 44 MMBBLs.The Central Brae reservoir is a proximal submarine fan sequence, comprising dominantly sand-matrix conglomerate and sanstone with a minor mudstone units. The sediments were shed eastwards off the Fladen Ground Spur and were deposited as a relatively small and steep fan at the margin of the South Viking Graben. Mudstone facies border the submarine fan deposits to the north and south, forming stratigraphic seals. The structure is a faulted anticline developed during the latest Jurassic and early Cretaceous, initially formed as a hangingwall anticline during extension but subsequently tightened during compressional phases. The western boundary of the field is formed by a sealing fault, whilst to the east, there is an oil-water contact at 13426 ft TVDss. The overlying seal is the Kimmeridge Clay Formation, which also interdigitates with the coarser facies basinwards and provides the source of the hydrocarbons.


1987 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 152
Author(s):  
D.G. Osborne ◽  
E.A. Howell

The Harriet Oilfield, discovered in November 1988, is situated within offshore permit WA-192-P in the Barrow Sub-basin. Following the Harriet 1 discovery well, detailed seismic surveys were recorded and a further ten wells were drilled on the structure between 1988 and 1985. Nine of the wells were completed as producers and one was plugged and abandoned as a dry hole.The oil accumulation occurs in a low relief, fault-dependent closure on the upthrown side of the Lowendal Fault. The trap is mainly structurally controlled but stratigraphic barriers are believed to be locally present, based on differing oil-water contacts in Harriet B-3 and Harriet A-5. These indicate the presence of three hydrocarbon pools separated by permeability barriers.The massive Flag Sandstone reservoir of Lower Cretaceous (Neocomian) age was deposited in a submarine fan environment, northward of the advancing Barrow Group delta. Reservoir quality is very good, with average core porosity of 22 per cent and permeabilities mainly in the range 800-2 000 md. However, a broad oil-water transition zone is developed above the oil-water contact. A residual oil zone is present below the oil-water contact in the northeastern area of the field, suggesting tilting of the structure after initial accumulation of the oil. The gross oil column in the main, Central Pool is 19-21 m with a gas cap up to 10 m thick. The 37° API crude is a relatively unaltered, high quality, paraffinic oil probably sourced from the Jurassic Dingo Claystone.The Harriet Field is the first commercial development of a Barrow Group hydrocarbon accumulation. Recoverable oil reserves are currently estimated at 21 million barrels. The field came on stream in January 1986 and by October 1986 oil production was averaging 10 000 barrels/day.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Jasper Verhaegen ◽  
Hilmar von Eynatten ◽  
István Dunkl ◽  
Gert Jan Weltje

Abstract Heavy mineral analysis is a long-standing and valuable tool for sedimentary provenance analysis. Many studies have indicated that heavy mineral data can also be significantly affected by hydraulic sorting, weathering and reworking or recycling, leading to incomplete or erroneous provenance interpretations if they are used in isolation. By combining zircon U–Pb geochronology with heavy mineral data for the southern North Sea Basin, this study shows that the classic model of sediment mixing between a northern and a southern source throughout the Neogene is more complex. In contrast to the strongly variable heavy mineral composition, the zircon U–Pb age spectra are mostly constant for the studied samples. This provides a strong indication that most zircons had an initial similar northern source, yet the sediment has undergone intense chemical weathering on top of the Brabant Massif and Ardennes in the south. This weathered sediment was later recycled into the southern North Sea Basin through local rivers and the Meuse, leading to a weathered southern heavy mineral signature and a fresh northern heavy mineral signature, yet exhibiting a constant zircon U–Pb age signature. Thus, this study highlights the necessity of combining multiple provenance proxies to correctly account for weathering, reworking and recycling.


Polymers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hajo Yagoub ◽  
Liping Zhu ◽  
Mahmoud H. M. A. Shibraen ◽  
Ali A. Altam ◽  
Dafaalla M. D. Babiker ◽  
...  

The complex aerogel generated from nano-polysaccharides, chitin nanocrystals (ChiNC) and TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers (TCNF), and its derivative cationic guar gum (CGG) is successfully prepared via a facile freeze-drying method with glutaraldehyde (GA) as cross-linkers. The complexation of ChiNC, TCNF, and CGG is shown to be helpful in creating a porous structure in the three-dimensional aerogel, which creates within the aerogel with large pore volume and excellent compressive properties. The ChiNC/TCNF/CGG aerogel is then modified with methyltrichlorosilane (MTCS) to obtain superhydrophobicity/superoleophilicity and used for oil–water separation. The successful modification is demonstrated through FTIR, XPS, and surface wettability studies. A water contact angle of 155° on the aerogel surface and 150° on the surface of the inside part of aerogel are obtained for the MTCS-modified ChiNC/TCNF/CGG aerogel, resulting in its effective absorption of corn oil and organic solvents (toluene, n-hexane, and trichloromethane) from both beneath and at the surface of water with excellent absorption capacity (i.e., 21.9 g/g for trichloromethane). More importantly, the modified aerogel can be used to continuously separate oil from water with the assistance of a vacuum setup and maintains a high absorption capacity after being used for 10 cycles. The as-prepared superhydrophobic/superoleophilic ChiNC/TCNF/CGG aerogel can be used as a promising absorbent material for the removal of oil from aqueous media.


2000 ◽  
Vol 3 (05) ◽  
pp. 401-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Nishikiori ◽  
Y. Hayashida

Summary This paper describes the multidisciplinary approach taken to investigate and model complex water influx into a water-driven sandstone reservoir, taking into account vertical water flux from the lower sand as a suspected supplemental source. The Khafji oil field is located offshore in the Arabian Gulf. Two Middle Cretaceous sandstone reservoirs are investigated to understand water movement during production. Both reservoirs are supported by a huge aquifer and had the same original oil-water contact. The reservoirs are separated by a thick and continuous shale so that the upper sand is categorized as edge water drive and the lower sand as bottomwater drive. Water production was observed at the central up structure wells of the upper sand much earlier than expected. This makes the modeling of water influx complicated because it is difficult to explain this phenomenon only by edge water influx. In this study, a technical study was performed to investigate water influx into the upper sand. A comprehensive review of pressure and production history indicated anomalous higher-pressure areas in the upper sand. Moreover, anomalous temperature profiles were observed in some wells in the same area. At the same time, watered zones were trailed through thermal-neutron decay time(TDT) where a thick water column was observed in the central area of the reservoir. In addition, a three-dimensional (3D) seismic survey has been conducted recently, revealing faults passing through the two reservoirs. Therefore, as a result of data review and subsequent investigation, conductive faults from the lower sand were suspected as supplemental fluid conduits. A pressure transient test was then designed and implemented, which suggested possible leakage from the nearby fault. Interference of the two reservoirs and an estimate of supplemental volume of water influx was made by material balance. Finally, an improved full-scale numerical reservoir model was constructed to model complex water movement, which includes suspected supplemental water from the lower sand. Employment of two kinds of water influx—one a conventional edge water and another a supplemental water invasion from the aquifer of the lowers and through conductive faults—achieved a water breakthrough match. Introduction The Khafji oil field is located in the Arabian Gulf about 40 km offshore Al-Khafji as shown by Fig. 1. The length and width of the field are about 20 and 8 km, respectively. The upper sandstone reservoir, the subject of this study, lies at a depth of about 5,000 ft subsea and was discovered in1960. The average thickness of the reservoir is about 190 ft. The reservoir is of Middle Cretaceous geologic age. Underlying the upper sandstone reservoir is another sandstone reservoir at a depth of about 5,400 ft. It has an average gross thickness of about 650 ft and is separated from the upper sand by a thick shale bed of about 200 ft. Both reservoirs had the same original oil-water contact level as shown by the subsurface reservoir profile in Fig. 2. Both sandstone reservoirs are categorized as strong waterdrive that can maintain reservoir pressure well above the bubblepoint. On the other hand, water production cannot be avoided because of an unfavorable water-to-oil mobility ratio of 2 to 4 and high formation permeability in conjunction with a strong waterdrive mechanism. In a typical edge water drive reservoir, water production normally begins from the peripheral wells located near the oil-water contact and water encroaches as oil production proceeds. However, some production wells located in the central up structure area of the upper sand started to produce formation water before the wells located in the flank area near the water level. In 1996, we started an integrated geological and reservoir study to maximize oil recovery, to enhance reservoir management, and to optimize the production scheme for both sandstone reservoirs. This paper describes a part of the integrated study, which focused on the modeling of water movement in the upper sand. The contents of the study described in this paper are outlined as:diagnosis and description of the reservoir by fully utilizing available data, which include comprehensive review of production history, TDT logs, formation temperatures, pressures, and 3D seismic; introduction of fluid conductive faults as a suspected supplemental water source in the central upstructure area; design and implementation of a pressure transient test to investigate communication between the reservoirs and conductivity of faults; running of material balance for the two reservoirs simultaneously to assess their interference; and construction of an improved full-scale reservoir simulation model and precise modeling of complex water movement. Brief Geological Description of the Upper Sand The structure of the upper sand is anticline with the major axis running northeast to southwest. The structure dip is gentle (Fig. 3) at about3° on the northwestern flank and 2° on the southeastern flank. The upper sand is composed mainly of sandstone-dominated sandstone and shale sequences. It is interpreted that the depositional environment is complex, consisting of shoreface and tide-influenced fluvial channels.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document