ONE-ATMOSPHERE PRODUCTION SYSTEMS FOR USE IN DEEP WATER

1979 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul B. Cochrane
Keyword(s):  
Deep Water ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Service System ◽  
Production Systems ◽  
System Development ◽  
Development Program ◽  
Well Drilling ◽  
Start Up ◽  
Subsea Production System ◽  
The One

The establishment of a joint industry sponsored subsea production system development program in early 1973 has resulted in the development of field-proven systems for the subsea production of oil and gas using the one atmosphere chamber concept.The program was completed in mid 1978 with the development of a deep-water multi-well drilling and producing station for the subsea production of oil and gas. Deep water is used here to refer to 3000 ft (915 m) and beyond. This study has resulted in equipment designs to provide for:A multi-well drilling and producing template to allow drilling and completion of approximately ten wells from a single rig location.Commingling of production from the wells into a common manifold chamber without laying flow lines.Connection of the production, service and electrical lines through a production riser, remotely located from the template wells, to a floating facility.Installation and servicing of subsea equipment using a one-atmosphere service system for deep water.The development of the deepwater system was preceded by the design, installation and operation of shallow-water equivalents.In October 1972, a one-atmosphere wellhead chamber was installed on a subsea well in 37S ft (114 m) of water in the Main Pass 290 field, offshore Louisiana. Subsequently, a one- atmosphere subsea manifold center designed to serve two subsea wells, completed with one-atmosphere wellhead chambers and one platform well, was installed. Since the August 1976 start-up of this subsea manifold center system, more than 300,000 barrels of oil and 680,000 MSCF of gas have been produced.

Risk Assessment and Reliability Analysis of Subsea Production Systems

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liaqat Ali ◽  
Shan Jin ◽  
Yong Bai
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Reliability Analysis ◽  
Deep Water ◽  
Production System ◽  
Evaluation Method ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Production Systems ◽  
Risk Identification ◽  
Subsea Production System ◽  
The Impact

Abstract In past years, offshore oil and gas accidents have often occurred. Environmental hazards have the capability of turning into very difficult to manage in addition with the modern technology limits and lack of a fail-safe operation that can identify, control and terminate the accidents. However, the offshore crude oil also natural gas search and development is expanding to deep-water and moving promptly to the subsea production systems. (SPS). Though, the complicate subsea equipment material besides frequency offshore disasters stimulated the consideration onto the risk analysis of subsea systems. Detection of the impact of deep-water oil and gas reserves in the subsea production system. However, loss of SPSs can contribute to massive industrial failure, severe natural pollution, and indeed serious disasters. Therefore, the reliability analysis and safety of SPS have turned into a dominant consideration. This study addresses on the hazards and risk conditions which must be concentrated in the subsea machinery associated within surface equipments. Furthermore, the risks identification also the risk investigation onto subsea “Xmas tree” system is brought out. An over-all risk avert procedure of subsea “Xmas tree” system is represented, also the reliability evaluation method. Moreover, several recommendations on subsea production maintenance and detection are given in this research. This paper is reviewing the following section, subsea production system, hazards or risk identification, environmental issues, hydrate problems, corrosion problems, safety issues, risk assessment on subsea “Xmas tree”, reliability issues of a subsea system.

Risk Assessment of Subsea X-Tree System

2011 ◽  
Vol 148-149 ◽  
pp. 1000-1006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang Yong Wang ◽  
Hong Huan Zhang ◽  
Meng Lan Duan
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Risk Analysis ◽  
Reliability Analysis ◽  
Deep Water ◽  
Production System ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Oil And Gas Exploration ◽  
Analysis Process ◽  
Subsea Production System ◽  
Exploration And Development

That the oil and gas exploration and development is extending into deep water proceeds the rapidly shift to subsea production system. However, complex subsea equipment and frequency offshore accidents aroused the concern on the risk assessment of subsea system. The paper illustrates the hazard aspects which should be focused on in the subsea equipment compared with the surface equipment. The hazards identification and risk analysis on subsea X-tree system is carried out. A general risk-prevent process of subsea X-tree system is illustrated, so does the reliability analysis process. Besides, some commendations on subsea detection and maintenance are presented in the paper.

APPLICATION OF NUCLEONIC INSTRUMENTS IN SEPARATOR PROFILING: KUITO FPSO CASE STUDY

2006 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 405
Author(s):  
B. Beinart
Keyword(s):  
Deep Water ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Produced Water ◽  
Single Point ◽  
Oil Production ◽  
Fluid Interface ◽  
Start Up ◽  
Fluid Levels ◽  
Separation Problems

The Kuito field lies in the offshore Cabinda Province, Angola. Kuito was Angola’s first deep-water oil and came on stream in December 1999. Kuito oil is produced via an FPSO. Kuito oil ranges 18–22 API. The FPSO has threephase, horizontal, gravity separation vessels that are used to separate oil and gas from unwanted produced water and solids prior to transportation. The production separators were designed with traditional, single point transmitters for measurement of the fluid interface and overall fluid levels. These were capacitance type instruments mounted inside the vessels in stilling wells.Following production start-up, separation problems began to emerge; these were manifested in numerous process upsets and shutdowns. Kuito oil can form emulsions quickly, and calcium naphthenate is produced at higher temperatures. If allowed to cool, it solidifies. The point instrumentation was unable to detect these emulsion and naphthenate layers resulting in the instrumentation becoming fouled and ceasing to function. The separators were operated ‘blind’, using tri-cocks located on the side of the vessel, and as the instrumentation was installed in stilling wells inside the vessel, it was impossible to maintain them without shutting down and depressurising the vessels. This paper describes how nucleonic profiling instruments were retrofitted to the vessels and shows how their operation was able to identify the different layers within the separators. This enabled the time of oil production to be increased and allowed the pro-active use of effect chemicals such as emulsion breakers and defoamers to be applied before the plant became unstable.

The Research on the Factory Accept Test Technology of Subsea PLET

2014 ◽  
Vol 986-987 ◽  
pp. 1619-1623
Author(s):  
Xiao Lei Zhao ◽  
Le Ping Chu ◽  
Xing Wei Guo ◽  
Guo He Yu ◽  
Jin Yu Chen
Keyword(s):  
Deep Water ◽  
Production System ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Development Mode ◽  
Gas Field ◽  
Oil And Gas Field ◽  
Subsea Production System ◽  
Offshore Oil And Gas ◽  
Embedded Type ◽  
Offshore Oil

With the development of offshore oil and gas field enters into deep water constantly, subsea production system has become the main development mode in deep water development. Pipeline End Termination (PLET) is common facilities in subsea production system and is used to provide subsea tieback interface. An embedded type PLET has been adopted in Panyu 35-1/35-2 Gas field with the water depth of 194 to 338 m. Factory Accept Test (FAT) is very important for the subsea production facilities, and the references is very limited due to technical security. This paper in detail states the flow chart, master equipment, purpose and precautions for each test of FAT for PLET, which collects great technology for the development of subsea production system.

The Study on the SIT Technology of Subsea ILM

2014 ◽  
Vol 986-987 ◽  
pp. 975-979
Author(s):  
Xiao Lei Zhao ◽  
Zhi Xing Wu ◽  
Le Ping Chu ◽  
Xing Wei Guo ◽  
Jin Yu Chen
Keyword(s):  
Deep Water ◽  
Production System ◽  
System Integration ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Depth Range ◽  
Development Mode ◽  
Gas Field ◽  
Integration Test ◽  
Oil And Gas Field ◽  
Subsea Production System

With the development of offshore oil and gas field enters into deep water constantly, subsea production system has become the main development mode in deep water development. Subsea Inline manifold (ILM) is common facilities in subsea production system and is used to gather oil and gas from the side subsea wells. Two subsea ILMs has been adopted in Panyu 35-1/35-2 Gas field with water depth range from 194 to 338 m in South China Sea. System integration test (SIT) is very important for the subsea production facilities. This paper states the flow chart, master equipment, purpose and precautions for each test of ILM SIT, which collects great technology for the development of subsea production system.

An Exploratory Study on Optimum Layout of the Cluster Manifold

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yingying Wang ◽  
Menglan Duan ◽  
Deguo Wang ◽  
Xu Yuan ◽  
Kai Tian
Keyword(s):  
Production System ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Production Systems ◽  
Oil And Gas Fields ◽  
Single Well ◽  
Early Development Phase ◽  
Subsea Production System ◽  
Typical Layout ◽  
Gas Fields ◽  
Optimal Cluster

There are four typical layout types for the subsea production system. These include single well tie back, the daisy chain, the template manifold and the cluster manifold. In the early development phase, an appropriate layout type needs to be selected. The layout design of the subsea production system is based on the data of oil and gas fields. Due to many advantages, such as less initial investment, being installed in advance, flexibility for development schedule and so on, the cluster manifold is becoming more popular and has been applied extensively in the layout of deepwater subsea production systems. In this layout type, the number and locations of cluster manifolds, and the connection types between subsea production facilities have a direct effect on the safety, flexibility and cost of the target deepwater oil and gas fields. Hence, how to design the optimal layout of the cluster manifold is of key importance. This paper will focus on the cluster manifold layout by the math means programmed using C++. For any given subsea well and the floating production system, the basic layout of the cluster manifold with the lowest cost can be obtained based on the assumptions, including the number, locations and cost of the jumpers, PLETS and flowlines. This mathematical method can reduce subjective bias from the engineers and provide a more scientific reference for obtaining the optimal cluster manifold layout.

Floating early production systems

2011 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 671
Author(s):  
Hayden Marcollo ◽  
Christopher Carra
Keyword(s):  
Deep Water ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Production Systems ◽  
Rate Capability ◽  
Full Field ◽  
Associated Gas ◽  
Field Development ◽  
Sea Bottom ◽  
Early Production ◽  
High Level

Floating early production systems (FEPS) are becoming more important to the successful exploitation of Australia's deep water oil and gas. Importantly, FEPS help oil and gas operators reduce deep water full field development risk, as uncertainty in the reservoir characteristics are reduced by obtaining dynamic data (that is, partially producing some of the reservoir). This paper will present a review of existing FEPS that are now in use or have previously been in use worldwide and will discuss where they are headed in the future. The paper focuses on: The selection of the floating and subsea-vessel, mooring, riser, mechanical connection, etcetera; Technology presently available; and, Addressing the requirements in situations where new floating and subsea technology is needed. The qualification limits of existing technology will be discussed in the context of what systems are ready and off-the-shelf for operators to make use of now. The choice of appropriate FEPS will be discussed as a function of: proximity to pipeline infrastructure, potential production rate, capability to re-inject associated gas, prevailing variation in year-round environmental conditions, waterdepth, and, geotechnical description of sea bottom. A high level conceptual case study showing typical costs for the implementation of a deep water FEPS will be presented as a way of understanding the potential upside and downside exposure for an operator considering undertaking a deep water FEPS program.

NOVEL PRODUCTION CONCEPTS FOR DEEP WATER AND ASSOCIATED HYDRODYNAMIC PROBLEMS

1998 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 855
Author(s):  
K.P. Thiagarajan
Keyword(s):  
Deep Water ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Production Systems ◽  
Gas Production ◽  
Oil And Gas Production ◽  
Cylindrical Structures ◽  
Campos Basin ◽  
Offshore Oil And Gas ◽  
Motion Characteristics ◽  
Offshore Oil

Offshore oil and gas production is now reaching to great depths, in excess of 1000 m, in the Gulf of Mexico and the Campos Basin, offshore Brazil. It will not be long before Australian companies look towards probable reserves in deeper waters that still remain within the Australian exclusive economic zone. Production concepts for deep and ultra deep water thus need to be studied and researched, and a constant watch should be maintained on developments around the world in this area.This paper presents two popular, and constantly evolving, concepts for deep water, namely: tension leg platforms (TLP) and spars. Tension leg platforms have been in existence for about 14 years, and are actively sought for deep water by worldwide operating companies. They are vertically moored by means of taut tethers which present interesting motion characteristics and unique hydrodynamic problems. Spar platforms are currently being installed for production purposes. These are large deep draft cylindrical structures moored by catenary or taut spread mooring systems. Physical details, advantages and limitations of both systems are discussed.While many aspects of these production systems are now understood, there are still several unknowns. Deeper waters translate to newer problems. Potential problems of the future are discussed in this paper, and research needs are highlighted.

The Application of ROV for the Subsea Christmas Tree Installation in the LiWan3-1 Deepwater Oilfield

2013 ◽  
Vol 331 ◽  
pp. 39-42
Author(s):  
Jin Gan Zhang ◽  
Hui Zheng ◽  
Jian Gen Bu ◽  
Cheng Gang Li
Keyword(s):  
Deep Water ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Production Systems ◽  
Christmas Tree ◽  
Oil Well ◽  
Remotely Operated Vehicle ◽  
Well Production ◽  
Indispensable Tool ◽  
Offshore Oil And Gas ◽  
Offshore Oil

Chinas offshore oil and gas has been developed from shallow water to deep water. Subsea production facilities play more and more role in deepwater oil and gas fields, in which Christmas tree is the key equipment to control and regulate the oil well production of deepwater production systems, but it has great installation costs and risk. For complex underwater environment, it is necessary to find a best way to install the Christmas tree securely and rapidly. ROV (Remotely Operated Vehicle) is wildly used in the field of offshore oil, especially in deep water for its large working depth, safe, efficient and other characteristics, and it has become an indispensable tool for development of deep-sea oil and gas. In one Christmas tree installation at Liwan3-1 deepwater oilfield, the ROV succeeded in assisting the installation of Christmas tree. The solutions for winding and wrong operation risk in installation process are given in the end.

Life Extension and Management of Ageing FPSOs

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hilman Salleh
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Deep Water ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Production Systems ◽  
Gas Production ◽  
Life Extension ◽  
Oil And Gas Production ◽  
Design Life

FPSOs have been a popular choice for deep water oil and gas production with many installations worldwide. Many of these floating production systems were tanker conversions and they are now approaching their mid-life or end of life hence, facing ageing issues relating to asset integrity. Concurrently, there are also requirements for these floating production systems to operate to operate beyond the design life. As most of this maintenance and refurbishment work is to be done while on station, there needs to be a structured process to ensure that all key areas of concerns are reviewed. This paper outlines the strategy available and addresses the issues and possible solutions to manage the life extension and ageing of FPSOs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document