Australian exploration review 2020

2021 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 331
Author(s):  
Ian Cockerill
Keyword(s):  
Coal Seam ◽  
Coal Seam Gas ◽  
Canning Basin ◽  
The North ◽  
Exploration Drilling ◽  
Eromanga Basin

Australian exploration battled on through the challenging headwinds of 2020 and surprisingly, 2020 saw an increase in exploration drilling on 2019 activity. Twenty-five exploration wells were drilled in 2020 versus 20 exploration wells drilled in 2019. Eight discoveries were made during the year, with the most significant being the Enterprise discovery in the Otway Basin. 2020 also saw a return to exploration drilling in the Beetaloo Sub-basin unconventional plays. Appraisal drilling was dominated by Cooper-Eromanga Basin and coal seam gas activity. There were no offshore appraisal wells in 2020. The exploration farm-in deals of note were Santos taking additional equity from Armour in their South Nicholson Basin unconventional project and Origin taking additional equity from Falcon in their Beetaloo Sub-basin unconventional project. Origin also farmed into the Canning Basin position of Buru Energy and Rey Resources. Australia is set for an exciting year of exploration ahead with a return to exploration drilling in the Bedout Sub-basin, further exploration drilling in the North Perth Basin and a continuation of drilling and testing of the unconventional plays in the Beetaloo Sub-basin.

The petroleum prospectivity of the Oobagooma Sub-basin and adjacent Leveque Platform, North West Shelf, Australia

2016 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 563
Author(s):  
Paul Harrison ◽  
Chris Swarbrick ◽  
Jim Winterhalder ◽  
Mark Ballesteros
Keyword(s):  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Long Distance ◽  
The West ◽  
North West ◽  
Canning Basin ◽  
The Past ◽  
The North ◽  
Late Tertiary ◽  
Exploration Drilling ◽  
Hydrocarbon Charge

The Oobagooma Sub-basin of the Roebuck Basin includes the offshore extension of the onshore Fitzroy Trough of the Canning Basin. Together with the Leveque Platform, it covers an area of approximately 50,000 km2, yet only 14 exploration wells have been drilled in the area to date, five of which were drilled in the past 30 years. The sub-basin contains sediments ranging in age from Ordovician to Recent. This study examines the petroleum prospectivity of a region that is one of the least explored on Australia’s North West Shelf. Recent exploration drilling has revived interest in the area, with the 2014 Phoenix South–1 oil discovery in the offshore Bedout Sub-basin and the 2015 Ungani Far West–1 oil discovery in the onshore Fitzroy Trough. The two most significant source rock sequences relevant to the Oobagooma Sub-basin are the Carboniferous Laurel Formation and the Jurassic section. The former interval is part of a proven petroleum system onshore and is the source of the gas discovered at Yulleroo and oil at Ungani and Ungani Far West. A thick Jurassic trough to the north of the Oobagooma Sub-basin is believed to be the source of the oil and gas in Arquebus–1A and gas in Psepotus–1. Hydrocarbon charge modelling indicates significant expulsion occurred during both the Cretaceous and Tertiary from both source intervals. Trap timing is generally favourable given that inversion structures formed in several episodes during the Late Jurassic to Late Tertiary. The Early Triassic, now proven to be oil prone in the Phoenix South area (Molyneux et al, 2015), provides an additional (albeit less likely) source for the Oobagooma Sub-basin. These rocks are thin to absent within the Oobagooma Sub-basin, so long-distance migration would be required from deep troughs to the west.

Jixi Basin CBM Accumulation Condition Analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 733 ◽  
pp. 35-38
Author(s):  
Jin Wen Zhang ◽  
Xi Chen ◽  
Peng Wang
Keyword(s):  
Coal Seam ◽  
Burial Depth ◽  
Coal Seam Gas ◽  
Coking Coal ◽  
Southern Basin ◽  
The North ◽  
Gas Coal ◽  
Gas Supply

Heilongjiang Jixi Basin is one of the important coal basins, and the CBM exploration is still in its infancy. This study shows that Jixi Basin is large in number of plies, thin in depth, poor continuity; the types of coal give priority to gas coal and coking coal, reaching the limits of angry thermo genic gas, coal seam gas with a large amount of gas supply is sufficient. In the southern basin, coal mainly developed in the range of 300~1200m, burial depth is moderate, and the dip is small, it is more favorable compared with the north.

Informal and Nonformal Adult Learning in the Coal Seam Gas Protests: Mobilizing Practices and Building an Environmental Justice Movement for Change

2021 ◽  
pp. 074171362110053
Author(s):  
Tracey Ollis
Keyword(s):  
Adult Learning ◽  
Coal Seam ◽  
Environmental Justice ◽  
Water Supply ◽  
Case Study Research ◽  
Coal Seam Gas ◽  
The Public ◽  
Theory Of Practice ◽  
The Earth

This case study research examines informal adult learning in the Lock the Gate Alliance, a campaign against mining for coal seam gas in Central Gippsland, Australia. In the field of the campaign, circumstantial activists learn to think critically about the environment, they learn informally and incidentally, through socialization with experienced activists from and through nonformal workshops provided by the Environmental Nongovernment Organization Friends of the Earth. This article uses Bourdieu’s “theory of practice,” to explore the mobilization of activists within the Lock the Gate Alliance field and the practices which generate knowledge and facilitate adult learning. These practices have enabled a diverse movement to educate the public and citizenry about the serious threat fracking poses to the environment, to their land and water supply. The movements successful practices have won a landmark moratorium on fracking for coal seam gas in the State of Victoria.

scholarly journals Classification of coal seam outburst hazards and evaluation of the importance of influencing factors

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xianzhi Shi ◽  
Dazhao Song ◽  
Ziwei Qian
Keyword(s):  
Coal Seam ◽  
Multivariate Regression ◽  
Multivariate Regression Analysis ◽  
Scientific Basis ◽  
Prevention Measures ◽  
Coal Seam Gas ◽  
Geological Factors ◽  
Hazard Level ◽  
Outburst Hazard

AbstractCoal and gas outbursts are the result of several geological factors related to coal seam gas (coal seam gas pressureTo classify the outburst hazard level of a coal seam by means of statistical methods, this study considered the geological parameters of coal seam gas and statistical data on the amount of material involved in coal outbursts. Through multivariate regression analysis, a multivariate regression equation between the outburst coal quantity andUsing a significance evaluation of the aforementioned factors, the relative contributions of the gas-related geological parameters to the outburst hazard level of a coal seam were found to follow the orderThis work provides a scientific basis for evaluating the outburst hazard level of a coal seam and adopting feasible and economical outburst-prevention measures.

Evaluation of social externalities in regional communities affected by coal seam gas projects: A case study from Southeast Queensland

2017 ◽  
Vol 131 ◽  
pp. 300-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna (Anya) Phelan ◽  
Les Dawes ◽  
Robert Costanza ◽  
Ida Kubiszewski
Keyword(s):  
Coal Seam ◽  
Coal Seam Gas ◽  
Southeast Queensland
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document