Synergies in the role of the Office of Groundwater Impact Assessment and the Independent Expert Scientific Committee on coal seam gas and large coal mining development in environmental assessments

2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 115
Author(s):  
Chris Pigram ◽  
Sanjeev Pandey ◽  
Peter Baker

The Independent Expert Scientific Committee on Coal Seam Gas and Large Coal Mining Development (IESC) is a statutory committee that provides scientific advice to Australian governments on the impacts that each coal seam gas (CSG) and large coal mining development may have on water resources. In this context, the IESC consider all aspects of a water resource, including water, organisms and ecosystems that contribute to or rely on them. The Office of Groundwater Impact Assessment (OGIA) is an independent statutory entity responsible for undertaking cumulative impact assessments from CSG and other petroleum production in Queensland, including the Surat Cumulative Management Area (CMA). OGIA also establishes impact management arrangements and identifies responsible tenure holders to implement specific aspects of those arrangements. Neither the IESC nor OGIA are regulators. Due to their respective functions both entities have different roles and interaction with CSG development in the Surat CMA. The IESC and OGIA engage regularly to ensure a shared understanding of knowledge, research and management. This paper provides an overview of key synergies between the roles and functions of the IESC and OGIA and considerations for proponents when using OGIA assessment in their environmental assessments that are referred to IESC for advice.

2018 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 640
Author(s):  
Glen Walker ◽  
Sarah Taylor ◽  
Peter Baker ◽  
Mitchell Bouma

The Independent Expert Scientific Committee on Coal Seam Gas and Large Coal Mining Development (IESC) provides scientific advice to decision makers on the impact that coal resource development may have on Australia’s water resources. In particular, advice is provided on development proposals that have been submitted to the Australian Government and relevant state governments in the form of environmental impact statements (EISs). The Information Guidelines developed by the IESC outline the information considered necessary to enable the IESC to provide robust scientific advice to government regulators on the water-related impacts of coal resource development proposals. Proponents preparing EISs are strongly encouraged to consult the Information Guidelines before developing and submitting a proposal. The Information Guidelines have been updated for the first time since 2015 and will be presented. The update includes important and more detailed information about what types and the level of information that should be included in EISs. In addition a series of ‘explanatory notes’ have been developed which provide practical examples of how information should be presented in an EIS. The first two explanatory notes relate to uncertainty analysis in numerical groundwater modelling and how to undertake comprehensive assessments and manage impacts to groundwater dependent ecosystems. Two additional explanatory notes will be released for use later in 2018. The updated Information Guidelines are a continuing step towards improving the robustness of information provided to the IESC.


2017 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 519 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. A. Post ◽  
P. A. Baker

As recently as two years ago, there were numerous proposals to develop coal seam gas projects across eastern Australia. Today the picture is very different. While significant coal seam gas development has occurred in the Surat Basin, Metgasco has surrendered their licences and AGL have indicated that they will not proceed in Gloucester. The only coal seam gas development that is still proceeding in NSW is Santos’s proposal in the Liverpool Plains (Namoi). However, recent developments in Australian Government policy to increase gas supply on the eastern seaboard means that the results of these assessments will inform future decisions. Research carried out as part of the Bioregional Assessment Programme (BAP) has shown some surprising results in the Richmond River (Clarence-Moreton bioregion) regarding the potential impacts of coal seam gas development on the water resources and water-dependent assets of that region. This study will show how we developed a groundwater and surface water cumulative impact model in the Clarence-Moreton bioregion, and present the key findings from that modelling. Similar cumulative impact assessments are currently underway in the Maranoa-Balonne-Condamine, Gloucester, Hunter, Galilee, and Namoi regions and we expect these to be published by late 2017. As part of a core tenet of transparency in the BAP, the data collected and models developed as part of these assessments will be freely available for Industry proponents, State regulators and other interested parties to access and utilise. The Surat cumulative management area in south-eastern Queensland has provided a structure for developing coal seam gas resources while protecting water resources via a cumulative approach to management. We propose that the models we have developed would provide the basis of a similar structure to assess and manage cumulative impacts in regions across Australia that may see coal seam gas or other forms of unconventional gas development.


2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 674
Author(s):  
Sanjeev Pandey

The coal seam gas (CSG) industry in Queensland has expanded rapidly in the Surat and Bowen basins within this decade. Depressurisation for CSG production has the potential to affect overlying and underlying aquifers. This leads to wide-ranging stakeholder concerns around the groundwater impacts, particularly cumulative effects, because the coal seams are part of the Great Artesian Basin. Relatively early in the development cycle, Queensland set a framework whereby an area of intensive petroleum and gas development is proactively declared to be a cumulative management area. For such areas, the independent Office of Groundwater Impact Assessment (OGIA) undertakes cumulative impact assessment and prepares management arrangements that are reported through the underground water impact report. OGIA’s assessment through its iterative reporting–monitoring–modelling cycle has been providing the basis for managing and monitoring groundwater impacts on the ground and providing clarity in tenure holders’ responsibilities. OGIA has also built extensive knowledge of the groundwater systems and developed innovative modelling techniques over the years that have wider application elsewhere. This paper shares OGIA’s journey in the process.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 193-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Sreekanth ◽  
Russell Crosbie ◽  
Trevor Pickett ◽  
Tao Cui ◽  
Luk Peeters ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 126440
Author(s):  
Neil R. Viney ◽  
David A. Post ◽  
Yongqiang Zhang ◽  
Fazlul Karim ◽  
Santosh K. Aryal ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 591 ◽  
pp. 125281
Author(s):  
D.A. Post ◽  
R.S. Crosbie ◽  
N.R. Viney ◽  
L.J.M. Peeters ◽  
Y.Q. Zhang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document