The evolution of FWI and its perceived benefits
Despite the mathematics behind full waveform inversion (FWI) being published in the early 1980s, it was 30 years before the method could be efficiently implemented on the scale of conventional 3D marine seismic volumes. FWI has evolved from using only transmitted waves and being constrained because towed streamer data lacked the very long offsets and ultra-low frequencies necessary to derive stable velocity updates beyond shallow depths. FWI now uses the full seismic wavefield (both transmitted and scattered wavefields), recovers deep velocity updates for standard offsets and frequencies and increasingly uses a wider range of frequencies that contribute to seismic imaging. We use several case examples to consider the benefits and caveats for robust FWI application: for resolving near-surface features and reducing seismic imaging uncertainty in areas with complex overburden heterogeneities; for resolving near-surface features and improving volumetric estimates; for using an enlarged bandwidth to resolve small model features; for updating the velocity in high contrast regimes; and for the creation of survey-wide, high-resolution models to reduce imaging uncertainty, complement attribute analysis, estimate elastic properties and prospect derisking. Collectively, we demonstrate how to produce high-resolution velocity models when conventional methods cannot and how to generate earth models in an accelerated fashion to reduce project turnaround. We describe pragmatic limits to what maximum FWI frequencies are reasonable and suggest ways that may soon by-pass signal processing and obtain direct earth attributes.