Impact of injected water salinity on CO2 storage efficiency in homogenous reservoirs

2018 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emad A. Al-Khdheeawi ◽  
Stephanie Vialle ◽  
Ahmed Barifcani ◽  
Mohammad Sarmadivaleh ◽  
Stefan Iglauer

Water alternating gas (WAG) injection significantly improves enhanced oil recovery efficiency by improving the sweep efficiency. However, the impact of injected water salinity during WAG injection on CO2 storage efficiency has not been previously demonstrated. Thus, a 3D reservoir model has been developed for simulating CO2 injection and storage processes in homogeneous reservoirs with different water injection scenarios (i.e. low salinity water injection (1000 ppm NaCl), high salinity water injection (250 000 ppm NaCl) and no water injection), and the associated reservoir-scale CO2 plume dynamics and CO2 dissolution have been predicted. Furthermore, in this work, we have investigated the efficiency of dissolution trapping with and without WAG injection. For all water injection scenarios, 5000 kton of CO2 were injected during a 10-year CO2 injection period. For high and low salinity water injection scenarios, 5 cycles of CO2 injection (each cycle is one year) at a rate of 1000 kton/year were carried out, and each CO2 cycle was followed by a one year water injection at a rate of 0.015 pore volume per year. This injection period was followed by a 500-year post injection (storage) period. Our results clearly indicate that injected water salinity has a significant impact on the quantity of dissolved CO2 and on the CO2 plume dynamics. The low salinity water injection resulted in the maximum CO2 dissolution and minimum vertical migration of CO2. Also, our results show that WAG injection enhances dissolution trapping and reduces CO2 leakage risk for both injected water salinities. Thus, we conclude that the low salinity water injection improves CO2 storage efficiency.

2021 ◽  
Vol 229 ◽  
pp. 116127
Author(s):  
Krishna Raghav Chaturvedi ◽  
Durgesh Ravilla ◽  
Waquar Kaleem ◽  
Prashant Jadhawar ◽  
Tushar Sharma

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (01) ◽  
pp. 118-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emad W. Al-Shalabi ◽  
Haishan Luo ◽  
Mojdeh Delshad ◽  
Kamy Sepehrnoori

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Sohrabi ◽  
P. Mahzari ◽  
S. A. Farzaneh ◽  
J. R. Mills ◽  
P. Tsolis ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-35
Author(s):  
Adityawarman Adityawarman ◽  
Faridh Afdhal Aziz ◽  
Prasandi Abdul Aziz ◽  
Purnomo Yusgiantoro ◽  
Steven Chandra

There are currently two fiscal regimes designated for resource allocation in Indonesia’s upstream oil and gas industry, the Production Sharing Contract Cost Recovery (PSC) and Gross Split. The Gross Split in the form of additional percentage split is designed to encourage contractors to implement Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) in mature fields. Low Salinity Water Injection (LSWI) is an emerging EOR technique in which the salinity of the injected water is controlled. It has been proven to be relatively cheaper and has simpler implementations than other EOR options in several countries. This study evaluates the LSWI project’s economy using PSC and Gross Split and then to be compared to conventional waterflooding (WF) project’s economy. There are four cases on Field X that are simulated using a commercial simulator for 5 years. The cases are evaluated under PSC and Gross Split to calculate the project’s economy. The economic indicators that will be evaluated are the Net Present Value (NPV) and sensitivity analysis is also conducted to observe the change of NPV. The parameters for sensitivity analysis are Capital Expenditure (CAPEX), Operating Expenditure (OPEX), Oil Production, and Oil Price. It is found that LSWI implementation using Gross Split is more profitable than PSC. The parameters that affects NPV the most in all PSC cases are the oil production and oil price. On the other hand, in Gross Split cases, the oil production is the parameter that affects NPV the most, followed by oil price. The novelty of this study is in the comparison of project’s economy between WF and LSWI using two different fiscal regimes to see whether Gross Split is more profitable than PSC on EOR implementation, specifically the LSWI at Field X.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document