Riser gas risk mitigation with advanced flow detection and managed pressure drilling technologies in deepwater operations in Australia

2014 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
Julmar Shaun Sadicon Toralde ◽  
Chad Henry Wuest ◽  
Robert DeGasperis

The threat of riser gas in deepwater drilling operations is real. Studies show that gas kicks unintentionally entrained in oil-based mud in deepwater are unlikely to break out of solution until they are above the subsea blowout preventers (BOPs). The rig diverter is conventionally used to vent riser gas with minimal control and considerable risk and environmental impact involved. Reactive riser gas systems provide a riser gas handling (RGH) joint that is composed of a retrofitted annular BOP and a flow spool with hoses installed on top of the rig marine riser. A proactive, alternative approach to riser gas handling, called riser gas risk mitigation, is proposed by using managed pressure drilling (MPD) equipment. MPD involves the use of a rotating control device (RCD) to create a closed and pressurisable drilling system where flow out of the well is diverted to an automated MPD choke manifold with a high-resolution mass flow meter that increases the sensitivity and reaction time of the system to kicks, losses and other unwanted drilling events. Experiments and field deployments have shown that the deepwater MPD system can detect a gas influx before it dissolves in oil-based mud, allowing for management of the same using conventional well control methods. Since the MPD system has already closed the well in, automatic diversion and control of gas in the riser is also possible, if required. This paper presents experience gained from deepwater MPD operations in the Asia-Pacific to illustrate this, and possible deployment options in Australia are discussed.

2011 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steve Nas

Closing the wellbore at the top with a rotating control device (RCD) for some kinds of managed pressure drilling (MPD) operations raises a number of issues with regards to well control and kick detection. The wellbore is closed and the standard flow check of looking into the well is no longer possible. The use of a RCD provides drillers with an additional level of comfort because it is a pressure management device, but it doesn’t eliminate the need to have well control as a primary objective. In recent MPD operations, it has already been observed that well control procedures are relaxed as a result of managed pressure drilling. Is managed pressure drilling the same as primary well control, and how do we deal with kicks in managed pressure drilling operations? At what point in a well control process do we hand over from MPD to drillers’ well control, and who is responsible? This paper will present some of the issues that need to be considered when planning and conducting MPD operations. Early kick detection and annular pressure control are promoted as an essential part of MPD operations, but there can be confusion as to where the responsibility for well control lies. Does the responsibility remain with the drilling contractor and operator or with the provider of the MPD services. The paper provides some case studies where MPD and well control conflicted, causing a number of issues that in some cases led to the loss of wells.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. Ma ◽  
A. Karimi Vajargah ◽  
A. Ambrus ◽  
P. Ashok ◽  
D. Chen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadir Farhi ◽  
Julien Christian Marck ◽  
Aniket Sanyal ◽  
Mohamed Ahmed Abdel Samie ◽  
Moataz Mahmoud Eldemerdash ◽  
...  

Abstract The Automated Drilling Director, a software application for drilling automation, integrates a physics-based model of the drilling system with machine learning and optimization algorithms to project the well path, monitor collision risk, manage vibrations, and control steering in real time automatically. With "intelligent" rotary steerable systems (RSSs), these steering decisions can be downlinked directly to the tool, thus, fully closing the loop around steering decision-making. Implementation of the Automated Drilling Director within a remote drilling center (RDC) enables the drilling operations to be conducted remotely and effectively with less rig site personnel. The resulting decisions are consistent and reliable, while a team of subject matter experts (SMEs) monitor the operations to optimize well assets, ensuring that the pre-job design of service (DoS) is executed properly. The validation of this innovative technology and approach in Kuwait, amongst others, opens the door to a new way of doing business, where resources, experience, and data are combined in the most efficient manner to improve consistency, as well as to maximize the value of the operators’ assets.


Author(s):  
Dalila Gomes ◽  
Marius S. Nilsen ◽  
Johnny Frøyen ◽  
Knut Steinar Bjørkevoll ◽  
Antonio C. V. M. Lage ◽  
...  

Gas kicks can occur during conventional drilling operations, in which case the well has to be shut in and the kick circulated safely out of the system. In back pressure managed pressure drilling (MPD) systems, one can tolerate minor influx sizes before the well is shut in. However, when using oil based mud, solubility issues can complicate the picture making both kick detection and safe handling of kicks more complex. For sufficient large pressures the solubility can be infinite. A kick can also be taken undetected and reach the riser before the free gas suddenly emerge with a corresponding volume expansion that can unload the riser. Managed pressure drilling can be based on having a rotary control device on top of the riser, which makes it possible to add a backpressure on top to dampen the volume expansion, but possibly also change the depth where free gas emerges. It has been shown in another paper how one can use transient models to predict what kind of surface pressure is needed to maintain a constant bottomhole pressure when free gas emerge. In this paper, a fully transient model developed for a research cooperation between a research institute and Academia will be presented. The model includes behavior of kicks in oil based mud and solubility issues. The model will be used to study the behavior of kicks in riser when considering a backpressure MPD system with special focus on MPD from floaters. One objective will be to show how the results can be impacted by accuracy in the calculation method due to the amount of numerical diffusion present. Another objective will be to show how the PVT model adopted can affect the results. In addition, one will study the impact on results when varying physical input parameters like kick size, magnitude of pore pressure and the geometry of the riser.


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Bacon ◽  
Albert Y. Tong ◽  
Oscar Roberto Gabaldon ◽  
Cathy Sugden ◽  
P.V. Suryanarayana

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 2743-2761
Author(s):  
Caetano P. S. Andrade ◽  
J. Luis Saavedra ◽  
Andrzej Tunkiel ◽  
Dan Sui

AbstractDirectional drilling is a common and essential procedure of major extended reach drilling operations. With the development of directional drilling technologies, the percentage of recoverable oil production has increased. However, its challenges, like real-time bit steering, directional drilling tools selection and control, are main barriers leading to low drilling efficiency and high nonproductive time. The fact inspires this study. Our work aims to contribute to the better understanding of directional drilling, more specifically regarding rotary steerable system (RSS) technology. For instance, finding the solutions of the technological challenges involved in RSSs, such as bit steering control, bit position calculation and bit speed estimation, is the main considerations of our study. Classical definitions from fundamental physics including Newton’s third law, beam bending analysis, bit force analysis, rate of penetration (ROP) modeling are employed to estimate bit position and then conduct RSS control to steer the bit accordingly. The results are illustrated in case study with the consideration of the 2D and 3D wellbore scenarios.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1754 (1) ◽  
pp. 012099
Author(s):  
Changfu Zhao ◽  
Guohua Cao ◽  
Hongchang Ding ◽  
Ying Zhang ◽  
Han Hou

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document