Reduced individual treatment delivery has no effect on outcomes in a multidisciplinary pain management program

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca M. Mowat ◽  
Gwyn N. Lewis ◽  
Robert Borotkanics
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Management Program ◽  
Individual Treatment ◽  
Treatment Delivery ◽  
Pain Management Program ◽  
Multidisciplinary Pain Management

Patients?? Perceptions of Their Pain Condition Across a Multidisciplinary Pain Management Program

2007 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 558-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rona Moss-Morris ◽  
Katrina Humphrey ◽  
Malcolm H. Johnson ◽  
Keith J. Petrie
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Management Program ◽  
Pain Condition ◽  
Pain Management Program ◽  
Multidisciplinary Pain Management

scholarly journals Reboot Online: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing an Online Multidisciplinary Pain Management Program with Usual Care for Chronic Pain

Pain Medicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (12) ◽  
pp. 2385-2396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Smith ◽  
Steven G Faux ◽  
Tania Gardner ◽  
Megan J Hobbs ◽  
Mathew A James ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Management Program ◽  
Post Treatment ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Pain Management Program ◽  
Multidisciplinary Pain Management

Abstract Objective Chronic pain is a prevalent and burdensome condition. Reboot Online was developed to address treatment barriers traditionally associated with accessing face-to-face chronic pain management programs. It is a comprehensive multidisciplinary online treatment program, based on an existing and effective face-to-face multidisciplinary pain program (the Reboot program). Design & Participants A CONSORT-compliant randomized controlled trial was conducted, enrolling adults who had experienced pain for three months or longer. Methods Participants were randomly allocated to either an eight-lesson multidisciplinary pain management program, Reboot Online (N = 41), or to a usual care (UC) control group (N = 39). Clinical oversight was provided by a multidisciplinary team remotely, including physiotherapists and clinical psychologists. Participants were measured at baseline, post-treatment (week 16), and three-month follow-up (week 28). Results Intention-to-treat analyses revealed that Reboot Online was significantly more effective than UC at increasing pain self-efficacy (g = 0.69) at post-treatment, and these gains were maintained at follow-up. Similarly, Reboot Online was significantly more effective than UC on several secondary measures at post-treatment and follow-up, including movement-based fear avoidance and pain-related disability, but it did not significantly reduce pain interference or depression compared with UC. Clinician input was minimal, and adherence to Reboot Online was moderate, with 61% of participants (N = 25) completing all eight lessons. Conclusions Reboot Online presents a novel approach to multidisciplinary pain management and offers an accessible, efficacious alternative and viable treatment option for chronic pain management.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document