scholarly journals Documenting COVID-19 screening before surgery during lockdown (COVID Screen): an audit with routinely collected health data

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 723
Author(s):  
David Story ◽  
Elizabeth Coyle ◽  
Abarna Devapalasundaram ◽  
Sofia Sidiropoulos ◽  
Bobby Ou Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Health Data ◽  
Surgical Patients ◽  
Contact Tracing ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Quality Initiatives ◽  
Systematic Screening ◽  
Routinely Collected Health Data ◽  
Rapid Changes

ObjectiveThis study analysed screening for COVID-19 before surgery and outcomes of any perioperative testing for SARS-CoV-2 infection during pandemic-restricted surgery. MethodsAn audit was conducted with routinely collected health data before both elective and non-elective surgery at two large Melbourne hospitals during April and early May 2020. We looked for documented systematic screening for COVID-19 disease and fever (>38°C) and results of SARS-COV-2 testing, and proposed a minimum acceptable documenting rate of 85%. ResultsThe study included 2197 consecutive patients (1279 (58%) undergoing elective surgery, 917 (42%) undergoing non-elective surgery) across most specialities. Although 926 (72%) patients undergoing elective surgery had both systematic screening and temperature documented, approximately half that percentage undergoing non-elective surgery (n=347; 38%) had both documented. However, 871 (95%) of non-elective surgery patients had temperature documented. Acknowledging limited screening, 85 (9.3%) non-elective surgery patients had positive screening, compared with 39 (3.0%) elective surgery patients. All 152 (7%) patients who were tested for SARS-CoV-2 were negative, and no cases were reported from external contact tracing. ConclusionsAlthough ‘not documented’ does not necessarily equal ‘not done’, we found that documenting of COVID-19 screening could be improved. Better understanding of implementing screening practices in pandemics and other crises, particularly for non-elective surgery patients, is warranted. What is known about the topic?Little is known about routine screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection among surgical patients. However, it is well established that implementing effective uptake of safety and quality initiatives can be difficult. What does this paper add?We found that although most patients had documented temperature, fewer than 75% had a documented systematic questionnaire screen for COVID, particularly patients undergoing non-elective surgery. What are the implications for practitioners?Clear documenting is important in managing patients. Pandemics and other crises can require rapid changes in practice. Implementing such measures may be less complete than anticipated and may require greater use of evidence-based implementation strategies, particularly in the less predictable care of non-elective surgery patients.

scholarly journals Perioperative Management of Elderly patients (PriME): recommendations from an Italian intersociety consensus

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (9) ◽  
pp. 1647-1673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paola Aceto ◽  
◽  
Raffaele Antonelli Incalzi ◽  
Gabriella Bettelli ◽  
Michele Carron ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Postoperative Care ◽  
Perioperative Management ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Surgical Patients ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Delphi Approach ◽  
Intraoperative Management

Abstract Background Surgical outcomes in geriatric patients may be complicated by factors such as multiple comorbidities, low functional performance, frailty, reduced homeostatic capacity, and cognitive impairment. An integrated multidisciplinary approach to management is, therefore, essential in this population, but at present, the use of such an approach is uncommon. The Perioperative Management of Elderly patients (PriME) project has been established to address this issue. Aims To develop evidence-based recommendations for the integrated care of geriatric surgical patients. Methods A 14-member Expert Task Force of surgeons, anesthetists, and geriatricians was established to develop evidence-based recommendations for the pre-, intra-, and postoperative care of hospitalized older patients (≥ 65 years) undergoing elective surgery. A modified Delphi approach was used to achieve consensus, and the strength of recommendations and quality of evidence was rated using the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force criteria. Results A total of 81 recommendations were proposed, covering preoperative evaluation and care (30 items), intraoperative management (19 items), and postoperative care and discharge (32 items). Conclusions These recommendations should facilitate the multidisciplinary management of older surgical patients, integrating the expertise of the surgeon, the anesthetist, the geriatrician, and other specialists and health care professionals (where available) as needed. These roles may vary according to the phase and setting of care and the patient’s conditions.

Tailored interventions to support the implementation of the German national guideline on screening, diagnosis and treatment of alcohol-related disorders: a project protocol

2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (6) ◽  
pp. 373-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernd Schulte ◽  
Christina Lindemann ◽  
Angela Buchholz ◽  
Anke Rosahl ◽  
Martin Härter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Alcohol Use ◽  
Guideline Implementation ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Organizational Factors ◽  
Diagnosis And Treatment ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Routine Practice ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Advisory Boards ◽  
Prevention And Treatment

Abstract. Background: The German Guideline on Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment of Alcohol Use Disorders aims to increase the uptake of evidence-based interventions for the early identification, diagnosis, prevention and treatment of alcohol-related disorders in relevant healthcare settings. To date, dissemination has not been accompanied by a guideline implementation strategy. The aim of this study is to develop tailored guideline implementation strategies and to field-test these in relevant medical and psycho-social settings in the city of Bremen, Germany. Methods: The study will conduct an impact and needs assessment of healthcare provision for alcohol use orders in Bremen, drawing on a range of secondary and primary data to: evaluate existing healthcare services; model the potential impact of improved care on public health outcomes; and identify potential barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence-based guidelines. Community advisory boards will be established for the selection of single-component or multi-faceted guideline implementation strategies. The tailoring approach considers guideline, provider and organizational factors shaping implementation. In field tests quality outcome indicators of the delivery of evidence-based interventions will be evaluated accompanied by a process evaluation to examine patient, provider and organizational factors. Outlook: This project will support the translation of guideline recommendations for the identification, prevention and treatment of AUD in routine practice and therefore contributes to the reduction of alcohol-related burden in Germany. The project is running since October 2017 and will provide its main outcomes by end of 2020. Project results will be published in scientific journals and presented at national and international conferences.

Implementation Strategies

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
JoAnn E. Kirchner ◽  
Thomas J. Waltz ◽  
Byron J. Powell ◽  
Jeffrey L. Smith ◽  
Enola K. Proctor
Keyword(s):  
Implementation Science ◽  
Comparative Effectiveness ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Efficient Manner

As the field of implementation science moves beyond studying barriers to and facilitators of implementation to the comparative effectiveness of different strategies, it is essential that we create a common taxonomy to define the strategies that we study. Similarly, we must clearly document the implementation strategies that are applied, the factors that influence their selection, and any adaptation of the strategy during the course of implementation and sustainment of the innovation being implemented. By incorporating this type of rigor into our work we will be able to not only advance the science of implementation but also our ability to place evidence-based innovations into the hands of practitioners in a timely and efficient manner.

scholarly journals The myth of pre-operative isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (3) ◽  
pp. 003685042110261
Author(s):  
Filip Mijovic ◽  
Stuart James ◽  
Bindhiya Thomas ◽  
Mohit Bhatia ◽  
Guillaume Lafaurie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Adverse Effect ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
National Health Service ◽  
Patient Adherence ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Retrospective Data ◽  
Second Wave

The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic called for the restructuring of National Health Service (NHS) surgical departments across the country. Initial guidance advised that patients undergoing elective surgery isolate for 14 days prior to their operation. As we learnt more about COVID-19 and its incubation period, at the Princess Royal University Hospital this guidance has been decreased to 72 h. We collected retrospective data for two patient cohorts that underwent elective surgery in June and September 2020, isolating for 14 days and 72 h, respectively. We followed-up these patients with several questions allowing us to categorise the cohorts into three groups based on their compliance with isolation measures and also to assess their satisfaction with the isolation process. Our data shows that only 16% of the June cohort and 53% of the September cohort isolated in accordance with the guidelines whilst patient satisfaction was 16% and 64% respectively. These results highlight a suboptimal compliance to pre-operative guidelines as well as an adverse effect on patient mental health and raise the issue of both patient and NHS staff safety. With the possibility of a COVID-19 second wave and for future pandemics, a clear evidence-based plan for pre-operative isolation is vital. Furthermore, consideration of patient adherence and satisfaction is key in deciding which guideline will be most effective.

scholarly journals The effectiveness of different patient referral systems to shorten waiting times for elective surgeries: systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimuthu Rathnayake ◽  
Mike Clarke
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Waiting Times ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
High Income ◽  
Surgical Patients ◽  
Timely Access ◽  
Referral Systems

Abstract Background Long waiting times for elective surgery are common to many publicly funded health systems. Inefficiencies in referral systems in high-income countries are more pronounced than lower and middle-income countries. Primary care practitioners play a major role in determining which patients are referred to surgeon and might represent an opportunity to improve this situation. With conventional methods of referrals, surgery clinics are often overcrowded with non-surgical referrals and surgical patients experience longer waiting times as a consequence. Improving the quality of referral communications should lead to more timely access and better cost-effectiveness for elective surgical care. This review summarises the research evidence for effective interventions within the scope of primary-care referral methods in the surgical care pathway that might shorten waiting time for elective surgeries. Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases in December-2019 to January-2020, for articles published after 2013. Eligibility criteria included major elective surgery lists of adult patients, excluding cancer related surgeries. Both randomised and non-randomised controlled studies were eligible. The quality of evidence was assessed using ROBINS-I, AMSTAR 2 and CASP, as appropriate to the study method used. The review presentation was limited to a narrative synthesis because of heterogeneity. The PROSPERO registration number is CRD42019158455. Results The electronic search yielded 7543 records. Finally, nine articles were considered as eligible after deduplication and full article screening. The eligible research varied widely in design, scope, reported outcomes and overall quality, with one randomised trial, two quasi-experimental studies, two longitudinal follow up studies, three systematic reviews and one observational study. All the six original articles were based on referral methods in high-income countries. The included research showed that patient triage and prioritisation at the referral stage improved timely access and increased the number of consultations of surgical patients in clinics. Conclusions The available studies included a variety of interventions and were of medium to high quality researches. Managing patient referrals with proper triaging and prioritisation using structured referral formats is likely to be effective in health systems to shorten the waiting times for elective surgeries, specifically in high-income countries.

scholarly journals Results of the CHlorhexidine Gluconate Bathing implementation intervention to improve evidence-based nursing practices for prevention of central line associated bloodstream infections Study (CHanGing BathS): a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Staci S. Reynolds ◽  
Patricia Woltz ◽  
Edward Keating ◽  
Janice Neff ◽  
Jennifer Elliott ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Audit And Feedback ◽  
Educational Outreach ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Intervention Effect ◽  
Cluster Randomized ◽  
Outreach Visits ◽  
Educational Outreach Visits

Abstract Background Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) result in approximately 28,000 deaths and approximately $2.3 billion in added costs to the U.S. healthcare system each year, and yet, many of these infections are preventable. At two large health systems in the southeast United States, CLABSIs continue to be an area of opportunity. Despite strong evidence for interventions to prevent CLABSI and reduce associated patient harm, such as use of chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) bathing, the adoption of these interventions in practice is poor. The primary objective of this study was to assess the effect of a tailored, multifaceted implementation program on nursing staff’s compliance with the CHG bathing process and electronic health record (EHR) documentation in critically ill patients. The secondary objectives were to examine the (1) moderating effect of unit characteristics and cultural context, (2) intervention effect on nursing staff’s knowledge and perceptions of CHG bathing, and (3) intervention effect on CLABSI rates. Methods A stepped wedged cluster-randomized design was used with units clustered into 4 sequences; each sequence consecutively began the intervention over the course of 4 months. The Grol and Wensing Model of Implementation helped guide selection of the implementation strategies, which included educational outreach visits and audit and feedback. Compliance with the appropriate CHG bathing process and daily CHG bathing documentation were assessed. Outcomes were assessed 12 months after the intervention to assess for sustainability. Results Among the 14 clinical units participating, 8 were in a university hospital setting and 6 were in community hospital settings. CHG bathing process compliance and nursing staff’s knowledge and perceptions of CHG bathing significantly improved after the intervention (p = .009, p = .002, and p = .01, respectively). CHG bathing documentation compliance and CLABSI rates did not significantly improve; however, there was a clinically significant 27.4% decrease in CLABSI rates. Conclusions Using educational outreach visits and audit and feedback implementation strategies can improve adoption of evidence-based CHG bathing practices. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03898115, Registered 28 March 2019.

scholarly journals The RECORD reporting guidelines: meeting the methodological and ethical demands of transparency in research using routinely-collected health data

2016 ◽  
Vol Volume 8 ◽  
pp. 389-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart Nicholls ◽  
Sinead Langan ◽  
Henrik Toft Sørensen ◽  
Irene Petersen ◽  
Eric Benchimol
Keyword(s):  
Health Data ◽  
Reporting Guidelines ◽  
Routinely Collected Health Data

Occupational groups and ischaemic heart disease in New Zealand – a longitudinal linkage study

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
L.A Barnes ◽  
A Eng ◽  
M Corbin ◽  
H.J Denison ◽  
A t'Mannetje ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Disease ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Ischaemic Heart Disease ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Health Data ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Inverse Association ◽  
Occupational Groups ◽  
Routinely Collected Health Data ◽  
Machine Operators

Abstract Background/Introduction Occupation is a poorly characterised risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), with females and minority populations particularly under-represented in research. There is also a lack of longitudinal studies using detailed health data that does not rely on self-reports. Purpose This study aimed to address these gaps by assessing the association between a range of occupational groups and ischaemic heart disease (IHD) in New Zealand (NZ), through linkage of population-based occupational surveys to routinely collected health data. Half of the study population were females and 40% were indigenous Māori (who comprise 15% of the total 4.8 million NZ population), which enabled sex and ethnicity-specific aspects of the relationship between occupation and IHD to be assessed. Methods Two probability-based sample surveys of the NZ adult population (New Zealand Workforce Survey (NZWS); 2004–2006; n=3003) and of the Māori population (NZWS Māori; 2009–2010; n=2107), for which detailed occupational histories and lifestyle factors were collected, were linked with routinely collected health data available through Statistics NZ. Cox regression was used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) for “ever-worked” in any one of nine major occupational groups, with “never worked” in that occupational group defined as the reference group. Analyses were controlled for age, deprivation and smoking, and stratified by sex and ethnicity. Results The strongest associations were found for “plant/machine operators and assemblers” and “elementary workers”, particularly among female Māori (HR 2.19, 95% CI 1.16–4.13 and HR 2.03, 1.07–3.82 respectively). In contrast, inverse associations with IHD across all groups were observed for “technicians and associate professionals”, which was significant for NZWS males (HR 0.52, 0.32–0.84). There were some sex and ethnic differences, particularly for “clerks”, where a positive association was found for NZWS males (HR 1.81, 1.19–2.74), whilst an inverse association was observed for Māori females (HR 0.42, 0.22–0.82). Duration analyses (≤2 years, 2–10 years and 10+ years) showed significant dose-response trends for “clerks” in NZWS males, and “plant/machine operators and assemblers” and “elementary workers” in Māori females. Further adjustments for other potential confounders such diabetes mellitus, hypertension and high cholesterol did not affect the results. Conclusion Associations between occupation and IHD differed significantly across occupational groups and between sexes and ethnicities, even within the same occupational groups. This suggests that results may not be generalised across these groups and occupational interventions to reduce IHD risk may therefore need different approaches depending on the population and specific groups of interest. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Other. Main funding source(s): Health Research Council (HRC) of New Zealand

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document