scholarly journals Young people in Australian residential aged care: evaluating trends from 2008 to 2018

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 831
Author(s):  
Mark G. Brown ◽  
Glenda M. Bishop ◽  
Di Winkler ◽  
Jacinta M. Douglas
Keyword(s):  
Young People ◽  
National Level ◽  
Population Level ◽  
Aged Care ◽  
Residential Aged Care ◽  
Community Living ◽  
Linear Regression Models ◽  
Admission Rates ◽  
The Past ◽  
Growth And Aging

ObjectiveOver the past decade, various programs and reforms have targeted the issue of people aged <65 years living in ‘permanent’ residential aged care (PRAC). As context for ongoing policy discourse, the aim of this study was to evaluate trends in rates of young people entering and leaving PRAC from 2008 to 2018. MethodsCounts of people aged <65 years entering, remaining in and exiting PRAC were obtained from the National Aged Care Data Clearinghouse. Age standardisation was used to control for changes in the age and size of the Australian population. Annual age-standardised rates of admissions (subtracting transfers) and exits to the community were calculated. Linear regression models tested for a sustained increase or decrease in age-standardised rates nationally and within state and age subgroups. ResultsNotwithstanding year-to-year variation, neither admissions (subtracting transfers) nor exits to the community showed statistically significant increasing or decreasing trends in the national age-standardised rates. Admission rates varied by age and state. ConclusionsMany more young people are admitted to PRAC each year than return to community living, with no sustained change between 2008 and 2018 at the national level. Age standardisation is crucial for evaluating systemic population-level change regarding younger people in PRAC. What is known about the topic?As at June 2018, over 6000 people aged <65 years still live in PRAC in Australia. Previous research has demonstrated that this cohort experiences a much poorer quality of life on average than people of similar age and disability who reside in other community settings. Various strategies for improving outcomes have been trialled, many aiming to reduce the number of younger people living in aged care; the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) also has this among its aims. What does this paper add?This paper reports trends in the number of young people entering and exiting aged care, after statistically controlling for changes due to population growth and aging. The paper highlights that national admission rates did not increase or decrease in a sustained manner, and that most of those admitted never return to community living before turning 65 years of age. What are the implications for practitioners?Programs and policies aimed at reducing the number of young people in aged care must grapple with the scale of the issue and its apparent resistance to amelioration over the past 10 years. The results of this study provide a benchmark against which to judge the future impact of the NDIS.

“Time's Up”: The Experience of Entering Residential Aged Care for Young People with Acquired Neurological Disorders and Their Families

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Barry ◽  
Lucy Knox ◽  
Jacinta M. Douglas
Keyword(s):  
Young People ◽  
Lived Experience ◽  
Neurological Disorders ◽  
Healthcare Setting ◽  
Aged Care ◽  
Residential Aged Care ◽  
Health Crisis ◽  
Complex Process ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Key Events

Background and aims: Previous research has highlighted that living in residential aged care (RAC) is associated with a range of negative outcomes for adults with acquired neurological disorders. This study sought to understand the lived experience of entering RAC for young people and their family members and characterise their needs during this process.Method: Data included 64 written and verbal submissions to the 2015 Senate Inquiry into the Adequacy of existing residential care arrangements available for young people with severe physical, mental or intellectual disabilities in Australia. In line with hermeneutic tradition, text was analysed using thematic analysis.Results: Entry to RAC was experienced as a complex process that coalesced around three key events: an unexpected health crisis, a directive that time's up and the individual is required to leave the healthcare setting, with a subsequent decision to move into RAC. This decision was made in the absence of time, knowledge of options or adequate support.Conclusions: Findings suggest that there are both immediate practice changes and longer term policy responses that can support the health and disability systems to uphold the rights of people with acquired disability to choose where and how they will live their lives.

scholarly journals Young people in aged care: progress of the current national program

2011 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dianne F. Winkler ◽  
Louise J. Farnworth ◽  
Sue M. Sloan ◽  
Ted Brown
Keyword(s):  
Young People ◽  
Service Providers ◽  
Systemic Change ◽  
Care Program ◽  
Aged Care ◽  
Residential Aged Care ◽  
National Program ◽  
Public Servants ◽  
Active Involvement

Objective. The aim of this paper is to examine the progress and effect of the current 5-year $244 million national Young People in Residential Aged Care program on the reduction of young people in aged care. Method. Semi-structured telephone interviews with 20 service providers, 10 advocacy organisations and 6 public servants across Australia actively involved in the implementation of the program. Results. The development of new accommodation options has been slow. The 5-year program aims to move 689 young people out of nursing homes; in the first 4 years of the initiative only 139 people had moved out. The lives of those who have been helped by the program have been enormously improved. Conclusions. This study highlights the challenges of achieving a long-term reduction in the number of young people in residential aged care, including the challenge of achieving systemic change to prevent new admissions. Implications. The accommodation options currently being developed for this target group will soon be at capacity. Without sustained investment in developing alternative accommodation options and resources to implement systemic change ~250 people under 50 are likely to continue to be admitted to aged care each year in Australia. What is known about the topic? Prior to the current 5-year, $244 million, national Young People in Residential Aged Care program there were more than 1000 Australians under 50 years of age who lived in aged care facilities. Aged care is not designed or resourced to facilitate the active involvement of young people with high clinical needs in everyday activities or support their continued participation in the life of their community. What does this paper add? In the first 4 years of the national program only 139 people moved out of aged care. The lives of those who have been helped by the program have been enormously improved. The program is unlikely to result in a long-term reduction in the number of young people in aged care. What are the implications for practitioners? Systemic change and sustained investment in accommodation options is required to resolve the issue of young people in aged care.

scholarly journals Corrigendum to: Who uses residential aged care now, how has it changed and what does it mean for the future?

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 983
Author(s):  
Diane Gibson
Keyword(s):  
Residential Care ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Aged Care ◽  
Residential Aged Care ◽  
Ageing Population ◽  
The Past ◽  
The Future ◽  
Australian Bureau Of Statistics ◽  
Care System

ObjectiveThis paper presents past trends in resident characteristics and usage patterns in residential aged care and explores implications for the future.MethodsTime series analyses were undertaken of national aged care administrative datasets and the Australian Bureau of Statistics Surveys of Disability, Ageing and Carers.ResultsAlthough the number of people in residential care has continued to increase, resident profiles have changed as a result of higher growth rates in the number of men and of people aged 65–74 years and 90 years and over, and a decline in the number of women aged 75–89 years. Relative to population size, usage rates are declining across all age groups, the average length of stay is shortening, and dependency levels appear to be rising.ConclusionChanging trends in residential aged care use, when combined with key trends in the broader population of older Australians, offer useful insights in planning for the future.What is known about the topic?Trends in the changing characteristics of permanent aged care residents and patterns of use of Australian residential aged care have received sparse attention in scholarly journals. Government reports and databases contain useful statistics, but they do not provide a coherent analysis and interpretation of the implications of these trends or situate them in broader population patterns.What does this paper add?The analyses in this paper demonstrate patterns of change and continuity in the use of residential care over the past decade, and locate those changes in the context of broader trends in the ageing population. Together, this provides useful insights into current and likely future trends, as well as a basis for imagining an improved residential aged care system in the future.What are the implications for practitioners?These analyses illustrate how data on aged care services, demographic trends and disease patterns can be used to consider the challenges that have affected our residential aged care system in the past and how that may be addressed in the future.

scholarly journals Who uses residential aged care now, how has it changed and what does it mean for the future?

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 820
Author(s):  
Diane Gibson
Keyword(s):  
Residential Care ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Aged Care ◽  
Residential Aged Care ◽  
Ageing Population ◽  
The Past ◽  
The Future ◽  
Australian Bureau Of Statistics ◽  
Care System

ObjectiveThis paper presents past trends in resident characteristics and usage patterns in residential aged care and explores implications for the future. MethodsTime series analyses were undertaken of national aged care administrative datasets and the Australian Bureau of Statistics Surveys of Disability, Ageing and Carers. ResultsAlthough the number of people in residential care has continued to increase, resident profiles have changed as a result of higher growth rates in the number of men and of people aged 65–74 years and 90 years and over, and a decline in the number of women aged 75–89 years. Relative to population size, usage rates are declining across all age groups, the average length of stay is shortening, and dependency levels appear to be rising. ConclusionChanging trends in residential aged care use, when combined with key trends in the broader population of older Australians, offer useful insights in planning for the future. What is known about the topic?Trends in the changing characteristics of permanent aged care residents and patterns of use of Australian residential aged care have received sparse attention in scholarly journals. Government reports and databases contain useful statistics, but they do not provide a coherent analysis and interpretation of the implications of these trends or situate them in broader population patterns. What does this paper add?The analyses in this paper demonstrate patterns of change and continuity in the use of residential care over the past decade, and locate those changes in the context of broader trends in the ageing population. Together, this provides useful insights into current and likely future trends, as well as a basis for imagining an improved residential aged care system in the future. What are the implications for practitioners?These analyses illustrate how data on aged care services, demographic trends and disease patterns can be used to consider the challenges that have affected our residential aged care system in the past and how that may be addressed in the future.

Everyday Choice Making: Outcomes of Young People with Acquired Brain Injury After Moving from Residential Aged Care to Community-Based Supported Accommodation

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 221-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dianne Winkler ◽  
Libby Callaway ◽  
Sue Sloan ◽  
Nadine Holgate
Keyword(s):  
Brain Injury ◽  
Young People ◽  
Acquired Brain Injury ◽  
Aged Care ◽  
Residential Aged Care ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Choice Making ◽  
Supported Accommodation

Objectives: (1) Examine the opportunities young people with acquired brain injury (ABI) have to make everyday choices after moving out of residential aged care (RAC) into community-based shared supported accommodation (SSA); (2) Compare everyday choice making of this group with a group of people with ABI living in RAC.Research design: Mixed methods comparing two independent groups.Method and procedures: Responses on eleven relevant items of the Resident Choice Scale (RCS) were compared between two groups; 45 people with ABI living in RAC and 20 people with ABI who had moved from RAC to live in SSA. In addition, the choice making experiences of the SSA group were investigated through semi-structured interviews with the individual and/or their family member. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed.Results: Greater opportunities for everyday choice making were demonstrated on 10 out of the 11 RCS items for people living in SSA, compared to RAC. These included improved choice regarding meals, bedtime and leisure activities. Qualitative data also illustrated new choice opportunities afforded to the SSA group. Five key themes relating to choice were identified: rules and routines, communication, things to do, food and home-like environment.Conclusions: Community-based, age-appropriate and small-scale supported accommodation provides people with ABI more opportunities for everyday choice making than RAC.

Council of Australian Governments' (COAG) Initiative for Young People With Disability in Residential Aged Care: What Are the Issues for Acquired Brain Injury?

2007 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 312-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Foster ◽  
Jennifer Fleming ◽  
Cheryl Tilse
Keyword(s):  
Brain Injury ◽  
Young People ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Acquired Brain Injury ◽  
Aged Care ◽  
Residential Aged Care ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Environment

AbstractPeople surviving severe acquired brain injury (ABI) may potentially benefit from the Council of Australian Governments' (COAG) 5-year initiative for young people with disability in residential aged-care facilities. Yet critical examination of this policy initiative for ABI population is warranted for 2 reasons. First, reliance on the disability sector to resolve the complexities of long-term care for people with ABI detracts attention from systemic failures at the health/disability sector interface, and notably, debate concerning the role of, and right to rehabilitation. Second, the COAG initiative is being pursued within an extraordinarily complex and variable contemporary care environment, involving multiple services and sectors, and historically, high unmet need. This raises questions as to the adequacy and sustainability of care provided under the responsibility of state-based disability services. In this article, it is argued that long-term care for young people with severe ABI is better served by incorporating a health and rehabilitation perspective alongside a disability support approach. Although the effectiveness of rehabilitation may be contested in some instances of very severe ABI, nevertheless the role of rehabilitation in seeking to reduce the number of young people at risk of entering residential aged care needs to be addressed in policy solutions. It is also suggested that provision of long time care in the contemporary care environment involves a number of challenges due to the complex and changing patterns of need, diverse funding arrangements and mix of government and nongovernment services, and the increasing demand for care.

scholarly journals Medication omission rates in New Zealand Residential Aged Care Homes: a national description

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie M Garratt ◽  
Ngaire M Kerse ◽  
Kathryn Peri ◽  
Monique F Jonas
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
National Level ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Medication Administration ◽  
Aged Care ◽  
Care Staff ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Residential Aged Care

Abstract Background Medication administration is a key service offered to individuals residing in residential aged care homes (RAC homes). A medication omission is an event where a prescribed medication is not taken by a resident before the next scheduled dose. Medication omissions are typically classed as errors, they have the potential to lead to harm if poorly managed, but may also stem from good clinical decision-making. Studies that critically appraise or support medication omissions in healthcare settings are limited. There is uncertainty around which medication omissions are problematic and how many on average a patient should experience. There have been several hospital-based studies, with limited sample sizes, timeframes, and inconsistent reporting of omissions. As the first population-level, RAC Home-specific study of its kind, this study quantifies the incidence, prevalence, and types of medication omissions in RAC homes on a national scale. Methods A retrospective review of de-identified, medication administration e-records from December 1 st 2016 to December 31 st 2017 was conducted. Demographic details of residents, care staff competency levels, medications, and RAC ownership types were included in the review and analysis. Results A total of 11, 015 residents from 374 RAC homes had active medication charts; 8,020 resided in care over the entire data collection period. A mean rate of 3.40 medications doses were omitted per 100 dispensed medications doses per resident (s.d. 7.27). Approximately 73% of residents had at least one dose omission. The most common selected omission category was ‘not-administered’ (49.9%), followed by ‘refused’ (34.6%). The mean rate of omission was found to be slightly higher in corporate operated RAC Homes (3.73 versus 3.33), with greater variation. The most commonly omitted medications were Analgesics and Laxatives. Forty-eight percent of all dose omissions were recorded without a comment justifying the omission. Conclusions Compared to other studies medication omissions within RAC homes in New Zealand are not as common as previously proposed. This study sets out the first national-level rate of medication omissions per resident over a one-year timeframe. Subsequent studies will address the medications omitted, the clinical significance of omissions and the place of medication omissions within clinical decision-making.

scholarly journals Young people in residential aged care: Is Australia on track to meet its targets?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Brown ◽  
Amelia Condi ◽  
Elise Davis ◽  
Isabella Goodwin ◽  
Di Winkler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Young People ◽  
Aged Care ◽  
Residential Aged Care
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document