scholarly journals Infection prevention quality indicators in aged care: ready for a national approach

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 396 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. J. Bennett ◽  
J. M. Bradford ◽  
A. L. Bull ◽  
L. J. Worth
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Quality Indicators ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Prevention Programs ◽  
Aged Care ◽  
Residential Aged Care ◽  
For Profit ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Infection Surveillance ◽  
Facility Level

Accreditation standards for Australian aged care homes include the requirement for programs to ensure infections are controlled. Effective infection prevention programs are supported by surveillance data providing the impetus for quality improvement and facilitating evaluation of interventions at the facility level. In 2016, infection control professionals employed in Victorian public-sector residential aged care services were surveyed to examine the nature and resourcing of local infection prevention programs and monitoring activities. Overall, 164 services participated (90% response rate). A high proportion (84%) reported executive support for infection surveillance, with mean allocation of 12h per fortnight per facility for infection prevention activities. Current surveillance activities included monitoring of infections and antimicrobial use (90%), influenza vaccination compliance for staff (96%) and residents (76%) and monitoring of infection due to significant organisms (84%). A successful statewide program including eight quality indicators has subsequently been implemented in Victoria. We suggest that a national focus could strengthen this framework, ensuring a uniform strategy with enhanced benchmarking capacity. Stakeholder engagement and refinement of appropriate indicators for monitoring quality improvement in public, not-for-profit and private sectors within aged care is required.

Senior staff perspectives of a quality indicator program in public sector residential aged care services: a qualitative cross-sectional study in Victoria, Australia

2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liam M. Chadwick ◽  
Aleece MacPhail ◽  
Joseph E. Ibrahim ◽  
Linda McAuliffe ◽  
Susan Koch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Public Sector ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Aged Care ◽  
Residential Aged Care ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Front Line ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Executive Staff ◽  
Care Services

Objective The aims of the present study were to describe the views of senior clinical and executive staff employed in public sector residential aged care services (RACS) about the benefits and limitations of using quality indicators (QIs) for improving care, and to identify any barriers or enablers to implementing the QI program. Methods A cross-sectional qualitative study using semistructured interviews and direct observation of key informants involved in the QI program was performed across 20 public sector RACS in Victoria, Australia. Participants included senior clinical, executive and front-line staff at the RACS. The main outcome measures were perceived benefits and the enablers or barriers to the implementation of a QI program. Results Most senior clinical and executive staff respondents reported substantive benefits to using the QIs and the QI program. A limited number of staff believed that the QI program failed to improve the quality of care and that the resource requirements outweighed the benefits of the program, resulting in disaffected staff. Conclusions The QIs and QI program acted as a foundation for improving standards of care when used at the front line or point of care. Senior executive engagement in the QI program was vital to successful implementation. What is known about this topic? QIs measure the structures, processes or outcomes of care and identify issues that need further investigation or improvement. QIs are increasingly being adopted throughout the world. In Australia, the public sector RACS QIs project was implemented in 2006. It is yet to be formally evaluated. What does this paper add? Perceived benefits and limitations of the QI program were identified, together with barriers to successful implementation of the program and recommendations for future improvements. QI data were reported to improve quality culture and assist with identifying clinical areas for improvement. However, the QI program was associated with significantly increased workload and some stakeholders questioned its usefulness. The QI program studied could be improved through better access to education and training for those responsible for data collection and results dissemination to appropriate training and resources; and revision of the QI definitions and reporting methods. What are the implications for clinicians? QI data are useful for identifying opportunities for quality improvement. Despite data limitations, public sector RACS can use data for internal benchmarking, staff education and targeting of quality improvement interventions. At the policy level, revising the QI definitions and simplifying data collection and reporting would improve and strengthen the program. At the clinician and executive level, there is also a strong preference for QI data that allow comparison and benchmarking between facilities.

scholarly journals Increasing the uptake of vitamin D supplement use in Australian residential aged care facilities: results from the vitamin D implementation (ViDAus) study

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pippy Walker ◽  
Annette Kifley ◽  
Susan Kurrle ◽  
Ian D. Cameron
Keyword(s):  
Vitamin D ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Aged Care ◽  
Residential Aged Care ◽  
Supplement Use ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
Aged Care Facilities ◽  
Residential Aged Care Facilities ◽  
Facility Level ◽  
Vitamin D Supplement

Abstract Background Adequate (≥800 IU/day) vitamin D supplement use in Australian residential aged care facilities (RACFs) is variable and non-optimal. The vitamin D implementation (ViDAus) study aimed to employ a range of strategies to support the uptake of this best practice in participating facilities. The aim of this paper is to report on facility level prevalence outcomes and factors associated with vitamin D supplement use. Methods This trial followed a stepped wedge cluster, non-randomised design with 41 individual facilities serving as clusters pragmatically allocated into two wedges that commenced the intervention six months apart. This multifaceted, interdisciplinary knowledge translation intervention was led by a project officer, who worked with nominated champions at participating facilities to provide education and undertake quality improvement (QI) planning. Local barriers and responsive strategies were identified to engage stakeholders and promote widespread uptake of vitamin D supplement use. Results This study found no significant difference in the change of vitamin D supplement use between the intervention (17 facilities with approx. 1500 residents) and control group (24 facilities with approx. 1900 residents) at six months (difference in prevalence change between groups was 1.10, 95% CI − 3.8 to 6.0, p = 0.6). The average overall facility change in adequate (≥800 IU/day) vitamin D supplement use over 12 months was 3.86% (95% CI 0.6 to 7.2, p = 0.02), which achieved a facility level average prevalence of 59.6%. The variation in uptake at 12 months ranged from 25 to 88% of residents at each facility. In terms of the types of strategies employed for implementation, there were no statistical differences between facilities that achieved a clinically meaningful improvement (≥10%) or a desired prevalence of vitamin D supplement use (80% of residents) compared to those that did not. Conclusions This work confirms the complex nature of implementation of best practice in the RACF setting and indicates that more needs to be done to ensure best practice is translated into action. Whilst some strategies appeared to be associated with better outcomes, the statistical insignificance of these findings and the overall limited impact of the intervention suggests that the role of broader organisational and governmental support for implementation should be investigated further. Trial registration Retrospectively registered (ANZCTR ID: ACTRN12616000782437).

scholarly journals Infection Prevention and Control Policies and Staffing: A National Survey of Home Health Agencies in the United States

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s301-s301
Author(s):  
Jingjing Shang ◽  
Ashley Chastain ◽  
U. Gayani Perera ◽  
Monika Pogorzelska-Maziarz ◽  
Patricia Stone
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Influenza Vaccination ◽  
Staff Member ◽  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Prevention And Control ◽  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Infection Prevention And Control ◽  
For Profit ◽  
Healthcare Settings ◽  
And Control

Background: Infection prevention and control (IPC) is a national priority in all healthcare settings, and IPC staffing characteristics have been linked to patient safety outcomes. However, there is a lack of knowledge about IPC in home healthcare (HHC), the fastest growing healthcare sector. Our aim was to better understand the current state of IPC in HHC, as well as the HHC staff involved with IPC policy implementation. Methods: A national survey was conducted between October 2018 and November 2019. The participants included (1) agencies recruited from a national HHC conference and (2) a national random sample of 1,501 agencies stratified by census region, ownership status, and rural or urban location. Survey items included staff influenza vaccination policies, antibiotic stewardship, infection surveillance, and IPC staffing. Descriptive statistics were computed, and differences by ownership were calculated using 2 and Student t tests. Results: Of the 535 HHC agencies that responded to the survey (response rate, 33%), 64% were for-profit agencies. Overall, 30.8% of the agencies (17.9% for-profit, 57.6% nonprofit; P < .01) required staff influenza vaccination. Most nonprofit agencies (84.1%) and about half of the for-profit agencies (48.1%) offered free influenza vaccinations to staff (P < .01). During the past influenza season, 62.6% of agencies (81.5% nonprofit vs 51.6% for-profit; P < .01) had 75% of their employees vaccinated for influenza, and 9.3% (2% nonprofit vs 13.5% for-profit; P < .01) reported that they did not track this data. Only 17.9% of HHC agencies used antibiotic prescribing guidelines, and 33.3% reported that they reviewed cases to assess the appropriateness of antibiotic administration and/or indication. Most HHC agencies (86%) reported collecting and reviewing infection data to identify trends, which was often done quarterly or more frequently. Almost every responding agency reported that the staff member in charge of IPC had other responsibilities including administrative, education/training, or quality improvement, and 33.5% of those personnel had received no specific IPC training. Also, ~6% of agencies (12.5% of government-owned agencies) reported that they currently did not have a staff member in charge of IPC. Conclusions: This is the first national study of IPC in HHC, which can be used as a benchmark for quality improvement initiatives in the home care environment. Compared to other healthcare settings, HHC agencies have substantial challenges related to IPC. Most HHC agencies do not have a staff member exclusively dedicated to IPC, and staff training is inadequate. Furthermore, a significant number of agencies have no staff influenza vaccination or antibiotic stewardship policies in place. The situation is worse at for-profit agencies, which dominate the current US HHC industry.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

scholarly journals Dry Eyes, Ocular Lubricants, and Use of Systemic Medications Known or Suspected to Cause Dry Eyes in Residents of Aged Care Services

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (15) ◽  
pp. 5349
Author(s):  
Muhamad Aljeaidi ◽  
Claire Keen ◽  
J. Simon Bell ◽  
Tina Cooper ◽  
Leonie Robson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Outcome ◽  
South Australia ◽  
Aged Care ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Residential Aged Care ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Dry Eyes ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Medical Histories ◽  
Possible Cause

Ocular issues are common, burdensome, and under-researched among residents of aged care services. This study aims to investigate the prevalence of dry eyes or use of ocular lubricants among residents, and the possible association with systemic medications known or suspected to cause dry eyes. A cross-sectional study of 383 residents of six aged care services in South Australia was conducted. Data were extracted from participants’ medical histories, medication charts, and validated assessments. The main exposure was systemic medications known to cause, contribute to, or aggravate dry eyes. The primary outcome was documented dry eyes or regular administration of ocular lubricants. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between systemic medications and dry eyes/use of ocular lubricants. Dry eyes were documented for 53 (13.8%) residents and 98 (25.6%) residents were administered ocular lubricants. Overall, 116 (30.3%) residents had documented dry eyes/used ocular lubricants. Of these, half (n = 58) were taking a medication known to cause, contribute to, or aggravate dry eyes. Taking one or more medications listed as known to cause dry eyes was associated with having dry eyes/use of ocular lubricants (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.15–2.94). In sub-analyses, no individual medication was associated with dry eyes/use of ocular lubricants. Dry eyes and use of ocular lubricants are common in residential aged care. Our hypothesis generating findings suggest the need for further research into the clinical significance of systemic medications as a possible cause of dry eyes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document