Stranded: causes and effects of discharge delays involving non-acute in-patients requiring maintenance care in a tertiary hospital general medicine service

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Armi Salonga-Reyes ◽  
Ian A. Scott

Objectives The aims of the present study were to identify causes of prolonged discharge delays among non-acute in-patients admitted to a tertiary general medicine service, quantify occupied bed days (OBDs) and propose strategies for eliminating avoidable delays. Methods A retrospective study was performed of patients admitted between 1 January 2012 and 31 May 2015 and discharged as non-acute cases requiring maintenance care and who incurred a total non-acute length of stay (LOS) >7 days and total hospital LOS >14 days. Long-stay patients with non-acute LOS ≥28 days were subject to chart review in ascertaining serial causes of discharge delay and their attributable OBDs. Literature reviews and staff feedback identified potential strategies for minimising delays. Results Of the 406 patients included in the present study, 131 incurred long-stays; for these 131 patients, delays were identified that accounted for 5420 of 6033 (90%) non-acute OBDs. Lack of available residential care beds was most frequent, accounting for 44% of OBDs. Waits for outcomes of guardianship applications accounted for 13%, whereas guardian appointments, Public Trustee applications and funding decisions for equipment or care packages each consumed between 4% and 5% of OBDs. Family and/or carer refusal of care accounted for 7%. Waits for aged care assessment team (ACAT) assessments, social worker reports, geriatrician or psychiatrist reviews and confirmation of enduring power of attorney each accounted for between 1% and 3% of OBDs. Of 30 proposed remedial strategies, those rated as high priority were: greater access to interim care or respite care beds or supported accommodation, especially for patients with special needs; dedicated agency officers for hospital guardianship applications and greater interagency collaboration and harmonisation of assessment and decision processes; and formal requests from hospital administrators to patients and family to accept care options and attend mediation meetings. Conclusions Delayed discharge of non-acute maintenance care patients results principally from impaired access to residential care, administrative delays involving external agencies and patient or family refusal of care. Proposed remedial actions require concerted interjurisdictional advocacy. What is known about this topic? Delays in discharge of non-acute patients requiring maintenance care can occur for many reasons and incur inordinately long hospital stays. What does this paper add? The present detailed chart review of 131 long-stay non-acute patients identified causes of serial discharge delays and quantified their prevalence and attributable bed days. Waits for residential care accounted for less than half the bed days, administrative delays involving decisions by agencies external to the hospital accounted for one-quarter and patient or family refusal of care options accounted for one-tenth. Strategies are proposed that may minimise these delays. What are the implications for practitioners? Delayed discharge of non-acute patients requiring maintenance care threatens to consume an ever-increasing proportion of acute hospital bed days. Remedial action is required from stakeholders both within and outside hospitals to reverse this trend.

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Meo ◽  
Joshua M. Liao ◽  
Ashok Reddy

Reducing the length of hospitalization is a shared priority for patients, clinicians, and other health care stakeholders. However, patients can remain hospitalized after being “medically ready” for discharge, accumulating delayed discharge bed days (DDBDs). As part of a quality improvement initiative, the authors developed a method to measure DDBD and define discrete barriers to discharge identified by inpatient clinicians. Patients with delayed discharge had a higher rate of in-hospital complications compared to those who were discharged routinely. To identify modifiable barriers among patients with delayed discharges, 2 patient subgroups were defined: prolonged hospitalization (>19 DDBDs, top quintile accumulated) and extended hospitalization (≤19 DDBDs). Patients with prolonged hospitalization were more likely than those with extended hospitalization to have financial ( P < .001) or behavioral ( P < .001) barriers, homelessness ( P < .05), and impairment of decision-making capacity ( P < .01). Understanding the characteristics and discharge barriers of patients who are hospitalized despite medical readiness may increase appropriateness of inpatient resources.


2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 329-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nidhi Rohatgi ◽  
Marlena Kane ◽  
Marcy Winget ◽  
Farnoosh Haji-Sheikhi ◽  
Neera Ahuja

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
David W McCormick ◽  
Julika Kaplan ◽  
Cliff Whigham ◽  
Michael Coburn ◽  
Stephen B Greenberg

Abstract Background Prostatic abscesses are rare and have been most commonly associated with gram-negative bacteria; however, Staphylococcus aureus has emerged as a leading cause, particularly in persons who are immunocompromised. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients discharged from Ben Taub Hospital with a diagnosis of prostatic abscess during January 2011–January 2019. Demographic, clinical, microbiologic, and radiographic data were abstracted from the patients’ charts and analyzed for comorbidities, causative organisms, clinical course, and outcomes. Results We identified 32 patients with a prostatic abscess during the study period. S. aureus was the most common causative organism (18/32, 56%). Most patients (24/32, 75%) were admitted to a general medicine service, and the median length of stay was 9 days. Twenty-one patients (66%) were treated with a combination of surgical drainage and antibiotic therapy; 11 (34%) were treated with antibiotics alone. All patients treated with antibiotics alone had full clinical recovery. Two patients (6.3%) died, both of whom had septic shock secondary to disseminated S. aureus infection. Conclusions Prostatic abscesses are rare and can be difficult to diagnose, leading to significant morbidity and mortality. S. aureus is a frequent causative organism especially in persons with diabetes mellitus or other immunocompromising conditions. Hematogenous spread of S. aureus infection to the prostate appears common. Prostatic abscesses can serve as the nidus of disseminated S. aureus infection.


Author(s):  
Daphna Grossman ◽  
Yona Grossman ◽  
Ezra Nadler ◽  
Mark Rootenberg ◽  
Jurgis Karuza ◽  
...  

Objectives: To determine whether education and integration of the Gold Standard Framework Proactive Identification Guidance (GSF-PIG) and the Palliative Performance Scale (PPS) into care rounds, in post-acute care settings, can facilitate communication between the interprofessional care team to enhance understanding of illness trajectories, identifying those who would benefit from a palliative approach to care. Methods: Interprofessional care teams received training on the GSF-PIG and PPS which were integrated into weekly care rounds and completed a post-evaluation survey. A chart review was conducted for the 40 patients and residents reviewed with the GSF-PIG and PPS. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and comparisons of characteristics between patients and residents who were grouped as positive or negative on the GFS-PIG surprise question using chi square analyzes and t-tests. Results: The GSF-PIG and PPS were found to enhance communication within care teams and enhance understanding of patient and resident’s illness burden. The chart review revealed that patients and residents whom the team would not be surprised if they died within 1 year were older (p = .002), had a lower PPS score (p = .002) and had more indicators of decline (p < .001) compared to patients and residents the team would be surprised if they died within the year. Conclusion: Training interprofessional care teams on the utilization and integration of the GSF-PIG and PPS during weekly care rounds helped increase the understanding of patient and resident illness burden and illness trajectory to identify those who may benefit from a palliative approach to care.


This case focuses on improving care coordination for patients who have been discharged from the hospital by asking the question: Is it possible to reduce the rate of repeat emergency department and hospital visits after discharge by improving care coordination? The study group included adults admitted to the general medicine service of an urban, academic medical center that serves an “ethnically diverse patient population.” Patients were assigned to nurse discharge advocates who provided the patients with delineated services and assistance during the hospitalization The Project Reengineered Discharge (RED) program substantially reduced repeat emergency department and hospital visits by improving care coordination at the time of hospital discharge.


2003 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. 595-600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarwat I. Chaudhry ◽  
Kolawole A. Olofinboba ◽  
Harlan M. Krumholz

1994 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 272-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Guarisco ◽  
Eugene Oddone ◽  
David Simel

2006 ◽  
Vol 88 (7) ◽  
pp. 650-652 ◽  
Author(s):  
RT Benson ◽  
JC Drew ◽  
RB Galland

INTRODUCTION The aim of this paper was to analyse patients who were unable to be discharged from a surgical ward despite being surgically fit to leave. PATIENTS AND METHODS Data were collected on all surgical in-patients on a single day. Patients who were surgically fit for discharge but whose discharge was delayed were identified. Demographic data and reasons for delay were noted. RESULTS Nine of 75 patients (12%) were surgical bed blockers. These patients were more likely to have been admitted as emergencies (P = 0.035) and were older (P < 0.01) than the remaining patients. They occupied 35% of the total ‘bed-days’ of the group as a whole with a median in-patient stay of 41 days compared with 2 days for the other patients. Trust-collected data, based on UK Government guidelines, showed only one surgical delayed discharge patient on the day studied. CONCLUSIONS Due to problems in defining delayed discharge Government figures probably underestimate the true numbers. Lack of intermediate care and social service provision are a major cause of bed blocking.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document