Evaluation of the impact of implementation of a Medical Assessment and Planning Unit on length of stay

2010 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline A. Brand ◽  
Marcus P. Kennedy ◽  
Bellinda L. King-Kallimanis ◽  
Ged Williams ◽  
Christopher A. Bain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Models Of Care ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Public Hospitals ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Medical Patients ◽  
Medical Assessment ◽  
Planning Unit ◽  
The Impact

Objective.The Medical Assessment and Planning Unit (MAPU) model provides a multidisciplinary and ‘front end loading’ approach to acute medical care. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of a 10-bed MAPU in Royal Melbourne Hospital (RMH) on hospital length of stay. Methods.A pre-post study design was used. Cases were defined as all general medical patients admitted to the RMH between 1 August 2003 and 31 January 2004. MAPU patients were defined as general medical patients who had been discharged from RMH MAPU unit as part of their RMH inpatient admission. Historical controls were defined as all general medical patients admitted to the RMH between 1 August 2002 and 31 January 2003. Results.There was a reduction in median length of stay that did not reach statistical significance. During the study period, median emergency department length of stay for MAPU patients was 10.3 h compared with 13.2 h for non-MAPU patients who were admitted directly to general wards. Conclusions.The reductions in length of stay are likely to be of clinical significance at the emergency department (ED) level. The MAPU model also contributes to providing care appropriate care for older admitted patients. What is known about the topic?There is increasing interest in models of acute medical management in public hospitals in Australia. One of the key factors driving interest in these models has been the need to improve patient flow to improve hospital efficiency and contribute to reducing bed access block. There are very little published data pertaining to the effectiveness of these models of care. What does the paper add?The paper reports non-statistical, but probably important clinical reductions in hospital and ED length of stay using a before and after cohort analysis. It highlights the difficulties evaluating these models of care in the absence of well designed controlled studies and suggests evaluation of length of stay needs to be powered to detect small changes in ED efficiency rather than overall hospital length of stay. What are the implications for practitioners?Practitioners in the area can draw on the results of this paper to design an acute medical planning unit and develop an evaluation framework.

scholarly journals Association of Emergency Department Waiting Times With Patient Experience in Admitted and Discharged Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 237437352110114
Author(s):  
Andrew Nyce ◽  
Snehal Gandhi ◽  
Brian Freeze ◽  
Joshua Bosire ◽  
Terry Ricca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Patient Experience ◽  
Waiting Times ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Short Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Patient’S Experience ◽  
Discharged Patients ◽  
The Impact

Prolonged waiting times are associated with worse patient experience in patients discharged from the emergency department (ED). However, it is unclear which component of the waiting times is most impactful to the patient experience and the impact on hospitalized patients. We performed a retrospective analysis of ED patients between July 2018 and March 30, 2020. In all, 3278 patients were included: 1477 patients were discharged from the ED, and 1680 were admitted. Discharged patients had a longer door-to-first provider and door-to-doctor time, but a shorter doctor-to-disposition, disposition-to-departure, and total ED time when compared to admitted patients. Some, but not all, components of waiting times were significantly higher in patients with suboptimal experience (<100th percentile). Prolonged door-to-doctor time was significantly associated with worse patient experience in discharged patients and in patients with hospital length of stay ≤4 days. Prolonged ED waiting times were significantly associated with worse patient experience in patients who were discharged from the ED and in inpatients with short length of stay. Door-to-doctor time seems to have the highest impact on the patient’s experience of these 2 groups.

scholarly journals MP38: The impact of physician handoffs on the outcomes of emergency department patients: a medical administrative database retrospective cohort study

CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
pp. S56-S56
Author(s):  
A. Mokhtari ◽  
D. Simonyan ◽  
A. Pineault ◽  
M. Mallet ◽  
S. Blais ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Emergency Physician ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Independent Predictor ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Emergency Physicians ◽  
Icu Admission ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: A physician handoff is the process through which physicians transfer the primary responsibility of a care unit. The emergency department (ED) is a fast-paced and crowded environment where the risk of information loss between shifts is significant. Yet, the impact of handoffs between emergency physicians on patient outcomes remains understudied. We performed a retrospective cohort study in the ED to determine if handed-off patients, when compared to non-handed-off patients, were at higher risk of negative outcomes. Methods: We included every adult patient first assessed by an emergency physician and subsequently admitted to hospital in one of the five sites of the CHU de Québec-Université Laval during fiscal year 2016-17. Data were extracted from the local hospital discharge database and the ED information system. Primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes were incidence of ICU admission and surgery and hospital length of stay. We conducted multilevel multivariate regression analyses, accounting for patient and hospital clusters and adjusting for demographics, CTAS score, comorbidities, admitting department delay before evaluation by an emergency physician and by another specialty, emergency department crowding, initial ED orientation and handoff timing. We conducted sensitivity analyses excluding patients that had an ED length of stay > 24 hours or events that happened after 72 hours of hospitalization. Results: 21,136 ED visits and 17,150 unique individuals were included in the study. Median[Q1-Q3] age, Charlson index score, door-to-emergency-physician time and ED length of stay were 71[55-83] years old, 3[1-4], 48 [24,90] minutes, 20.8[9.9,32.7] hours, respectively. In multilevel multivariate analysis (OR handoff/no handoff [CI95%] or GMR[SE]), handoff status was not associated with mortality 0.89[0.77,1.02], surgery 0.95[0.85,1.07] or hospital length of stay (-0.02[0.03]). Non-handed-off patients had an increased risk of ICU admission (0.75[0.64,0.87]). ED occupancy rate was an independent predictor of mortality and ICU admission rate irrespectively of handoff status. Sensitivity and sub-group based analyses yielded no further information. Conclusion: Emergency physicians’ handoffs do not seem to increase the risk of severe in-hospital adverse events. ED occupancy rate is an independent predictor of mortality. Further studies are needed to explore the impact of ED handoffs on adverse events of low and moderate severity.

scholarly journals Evaluation of hospital length of stay and revenues as a function of admission mode, clinical pathways including observation unit stay and hospitalization characteristics

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrique Casalino ◽  
Anne Perozziello ◽  
Christophe Choquet ◽  
Sonia Curac ◽  
Christophe Leroy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Clinical Pathways ◽  
Electronic System ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Observation Unit ◽  
Mean Differences ◽  
The Impact

Objectives Hospital length of stay (days) and revenues per day (euros) could be different depending on admission mode. To determine the impact of admission mode as a function of clinical pathway, we conducted the present study. Data sources: We included 159,206 admissions to three academic hospitals during a four-year period. Data were obtained from the electronic system of the hospital trust. Study design A case (through-emergency department)–control (elective (EA)) study was conducted (77,052), matched by age, stay severity and type, disease-related group, and discharge mode. Principal findings: Through-emergency department were significantly elderly, more severe, had more intensive care stays, a higher mortality rate, longer length of stay (days) (9.5 ± 12 vs. 6.8 ± 9.5; p < 0.0001), and lower revenues per day (647 ± 451 vs. 721 ± 422; p = 0.01). In case–control study, mean differences between cases and controls were: longer length of stay −0.64 and revenues per day −75.6; for ≥75 years −1.2 and −102.1; medical −0.9 and −90.4; and discharge to facilities care centers −1.5 and −81.8. Among cases, 40% had a stay in observation unit before being admitted in hospital ward. Differences were strongly reduced for patients who did not go to observation unit before being admitted. Differences were reduced from 0.64 to 0.2 days for length of stay and from 79 to 41 euros for revenues per day when patients did not stay in observation unit before being admitted. Conclusions We conclude that admission mode is associated with length of stay and revenues. However, as differences are weak, elective admissions should not be prioritized on economic arguments. Otherwise, our study indicates that among through-emergency department admissions, observation unit stay is associated with longer length of stay and lower revenues.

scholarly journals Predictive factors for prolonged hospitalisation in acute pyelonephritis patients admitted to the emergency medicine ward

2021 ◽  
pp. 102490792110009
Author(s):  
Howard Tat Chun Chan ◽  
Ling Yan Leung ◽  
Alex Kwok Keung Law ◽  
Chi Hung Cheng ◽  
Colin A Graham
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Acute Pyelonephritis ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Prolonged Length ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Prolonged Hospital ◽  
Emergency Medicine Ward

Background: Acute pyelonephritis is a bacterial infection of the upper urinary tract. Patients can be admitted to a variety of wards for treatment. However, at the Prince of Wales Hospital in Hong Kong, they are managed initially in the emergency medicine ward. The aim of the study is to identify the risk factors that are associated with a prolonged hospital length of stay. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in Prince of Wales Hospital. The study recruited patients who were admitted to the emergency medicine ward between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2017. These patients presented with clinical features of pyelonephritis, received antibiotic treatment and had a discharge diagnosis of pyelonephritis. The length of stay was measured and any length of stay over 72 h was considered to be prolonged. Results: There were 271 patients admitted to the emergency medicine ward, and 118 (44%) had a prolonged hospital length of stay. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that the only statistically significant predictor of prolonged length of stay was a raised C-reactive protein (odds ratio 1.01; 95% confidence 1.01–1.02; p < 0.0001). Out of 271 patients, 261 received antibiotics in the emergency department. All 10 patients (8.5%) who did not receive antibiotics in emergency department had a prolonged length of stay (p = 0.0002). Conclusion: In this series of acute pyelonephritis treated in the emergency medicine ward, raised C-reactive protein levels were predictive for prolonged length of stay. Patients who did not receive antibiotics in the emergency department prior to emergency medicine ward admission had prolonged length of stay.

Disagreement between emergency department admission diagnosis and hospital discharge diagnosis: mortality and morbidity

Diagnosis ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Eames ◽  
Arie Eisenman ◽  
Richard J. Schuster
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Admission Diagnosis ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
Emergency Department Admission ◽  
Icu Length Of Stay ◽  
Discordant Group

AbstractPrevious studies have shown that changes in diagnoses from admission to discharge are associated with poorer outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate how diagnostic discordance affects patient outcomes.: The first three digits of ICD-9-CM codes at admission and discharge were compared for concordance. The study involved 6281 patients admitted to the Western Galilee Medical Center, Naharyia, Israel from the emergency department (ED) between 01 November 2012 and 21 January 2013. Concordant and discordant diagnoses were compared in terms of, length of stay, number of transfers, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, readmission, and mortality.: Discordant diagnoses was associated with increases in patient mortality rate (5.1% vs. 1.5%; RR 3.35, 95% CI 2.43, 4.62; p<0.001), the number of ICU admissions (6.7% vs. 2.7%; RR 2.58, 95% CI 2.07, 3.32; p<0.001), hospital length of stay (3.8 vs. 2.5 days; difference 1.3 days, 95% CI 1.2, 1.4; p<0.001), ICU length of stay (5.2 vs. 3.8 days; difference 1.4 days, 95% CI 1.0, 1.9; p<0.001), and 30 days readmission (14.11% vs. 12.38%; RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.00, 1.30; p=0.0418). ED length of stay was also greater for the discordant group (3.0 vs. 2.9 h; difference 8.8 min; 95% CI 0.1, 0.2; p<0.001): These findings indicate discordant admission and discharge diagnoses are associated with increases in morbidity and mortality. Further research should identify modifiable causes of discordance.

scholarly journals The Impact of Selenium Supplementation on Trauma Patients—Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Nutrients ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 342
Author(s):  
Jen-Fu Huang ◽  
Chih-Po Hsu ◽  
Chun-Hsiang Ouyang ◽  
Chi-Tung Cheng ◽  
Chia-Cheng Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Standard Difference ◽  
The Impact

This study aimed to assess current evidence regarding the effect of selenium (Se) supplementation on the prognosis in patients sustaining trauma. MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched with the following terms: “trace element”, “selenium”, “copper”, “zinc”, “injury”, and “trauma”. Seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that Se supplementation was associated with a lower mortality rate (OR 0.733, 95% CI: 0.586, 0.918, p = 0.007; heterogeneity, I2 = 0%). Regarding the incidence of infectious complications, there was no statistically significant benefit after analyzing the four studies (OR 0.942, 95% CI: 0.695, 1.277, p = 0.702; heterogeneity, I2 = 14.343%). The patients with Se supplementation had a reduced ICU length of stay (standard difference in means (SMD): −0.324, 95% CI: −0.382, −0.265, p < 0.001; heterogeneity, I2 = 0%) and lesser hospital length of stay (SMD: −0.243, 95% CI: −0.474, −0.012, p < 0.001; heterogeneity, I2 = 45.496%). Se supplementation after trauma confers positive effects in decreasing the mortality and length of ICU and hospital stay.

scholarly journals Association of Herpes Simplex Virus Testing with Hospital Length of Stay for Infants ≤60 Days of Age Undergoing Evaluation for Meningitis

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. 492-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul L Aronson ◽  
Andrea T Cruz ◽  
Stephen B Freedman ◽  
Fran Balamuth ◽  
Kendra L Grether-Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Herpes Simplex Virus ◽  
Herpes Simplex ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Incident Rate ◽  
Neonatal Herpes Simplex ◽  
Simplex Virus ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Pcr Test

Although neonatal herpes simplex virus (HSV) causes significant morbidity, utilization of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) HSV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test remains variable. Our objective was to examine the association of CSF HSV PCR testing with length of stay (LOS) in a 20-center retrospective cohort of hospitalized infants aged ≤60 days undergoing evaluation for meningitis after adjustment for patient-level factors and clustering by center. Of 20,496 eligible infants, 7,399 (36.1%) had a CSF HSV PCR test performed, and 46 (0.6% of those tested) had a positive test. Infants who had a CSF HSV PCR test performed had a 23% longer hospital LOS (incident rate ratio 1.23; 95% CI: 1.14-1.33). Targeted CSF HSV PCR testing may mitigate the impact on LOS for low-risk infants.

Abstract 4603: Home Surveillance Results in Improved Interstage Weight Gain in Infants following the Norwood Operation

Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Uzark ◽  
Paula Eldridge ◽  
William Border ◽  
Mary Pat Alfaro ◽  
Megan Donley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weight Gain ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Complex Congenital Heart Disease ◽  
Norwood Operation ◽  
Weight Monitoring ◽  
The Impact

Infants with complex congenital heart disease are at increased risk for malnutrition and poor weight gain. At our institution, infants who undergo Stage I Norwood operation are discharged with a home surveillance (HomeSurv) program which includes weight monitoring. To evaluate the impact of home surveillance on interstage growth, a current cohort of patients enrolled in Home Surv (n=18) was compared to a cohort discharged immediately prior to the implementation of the Home Surv program (n=20). The cohorts were compared using parametric and non-parametric methods as appropriate. Results: Infants underwent Stage I at a median age of 3.5 days (range 1–26), and at a mean weight 3.0 ± 0.4 kg., 26 with a modified Blalock-Taussig shunt and 12 with a right ventricular-to-pulmonary artery shunt. There were 26 males and 12 females. There were no significant differences between the groups with and without HomeSurv with respect to Stage I age, sex, Stage I weight, or shunt type. Stage I discharge weights were similar between the two cohorts (p=0.23) and there was no significant difference in Stage I hospital length of stay (p=0.10). Mean age at Stage II was 5.1 mos in the HomeSurv group and 4.9 mos in the pre-HomeSurv group, (p = 0.63). Mean weight at Stage II was higher in the HomeSurv group, but not statistically significant (5.9 kg vs 5.5 kg, p=0.30). However, weight gain >15 gms/day post Stage I discharge (our minimum weight gain threshold) was achieved by 89% of infants with Home Surv in comparison to 60% of the pre-HomeSurv group, p<.05. Weight gain was not significantly correlated with weight at Stage I, Stage I hospital length of stay, or age at Stage II, and was not significantly different related to shunt type. Conclusion: Home surveillance including weight monitoring following Stage I Norwood positively impacts interstage weight gain. In particular, it appears to confer protection for at-risk infants who fall below the threshold weight gain of 15gms/day. Future studies should explore whether this improved weight gain is an important factor in interstage morbidity and mortality.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document