scholarly journals Multifaceted guideline implementation strategies improve early identification and management of osteoporosis

2009 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheryl M Kimber ◽  
Karen A Grimmer-Somers
Keyword(s):  
Early Identification ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Guideline Implementation ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Fragility Fractures ◽  
Management Approach ◽  
Routine Practice ◽  
Patient Records ◽  
Fracture Management ◽  
Metropolitan Hospital

Background: Osteoporosis contributes significantly to fractures, subsequent disability and premature mortality in Australia. Better detection and management of osteoporosis will reduce unnecessary health expenditure. Objective: To evaluate, in one large tertiary metropolitan hospital, the orthopaedic health care team?s approach to osteoporosis guideline implementation to improve early identification and management of osteoporosis. Methods: This paper describes the implementation of multifaceted strategies to improve healthpromoting behaviours and the uptake of osteoporosis guidelines by staff in the orthopaedic outpatient clinic at one metropolitan hospital, reflecting organisational and individual commitment to embedding guideline recommendations into routine practice. Implementation strategies were aimed at the requirements and perspectives of different stakeholder groups. Five audit datasets were compared: 62 patient records in two baseline audits, and three post-implementation audits of 31 patient records, collected over the following 3-month periods (August 2006 to April 2007). All audits used the same criteria to assess compliance with clinical guidelines, and outcomes of implementation strategies. Results: There was consistent improvement in compliance with osteoporosis guidelines over the audit periods. Comparing baseline and immediate post-implementation data, there was a significant improvement (P < 0.05) in the percentage of patients with likely fragility fractures who were identified with an osteoporotic fracture. The percentage of patients who had a likely fragility fracture, with whom staff communicated about their problems and how to deal with them, increased consistently over all post-implementation audit periods. For patients with established osteoporosis who presented with fragility fractures, there was sustained improvement over the audit periods in the percentage provided with guideline-based care. Conclusion: This study highlights that appropriate and targeted intervention strategies can be effective if modelled on best practice guideline implementation approaches with the use of a coordinated post-fracture management approach to osteoporosis.

Tailored interventions to support the implementation of the German national guideline on screening, diagnosis and treatment of alcohol-related disorders: a project protocol

2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (6) ◽  
pp. 373-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernd Schulte ◽  
Christina Lindemann ◽  
Angela Buchholz ◽  
Anke Rosahl ◽  
Martin Härter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Alcohol Use ◽  
Guideline Implementation ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Organizational Factors ◽  
Diagnosis And Treatment ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Routine Practice ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Advisory Boards ◽  
Prevention And Treatment

Abstract. Background: The German Guideline on Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment of Alcohol Use Disorders aims to increase the uptake of evidence-based interventions for the early identification, diagnosis, prevention and treatment of alcohol-related disorders in relevant healthcare settings. To date, dissemination has not been accompanied by a guideline implementation strategy. The aim of this study is to develop tailored guideline implementation strategies and to field-test these in relevant medical and psycho-social settings in the city of Bremen, Germany. Methods: The study will conduct an impact and needs assessment of healthcare provision for alcohol use orders in Bremen, drawing on a range of secondary and primary data to: evaluate existing healthcare services; model the potential impact of improved care on public health outcomes; and identify potential barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence-based guidelines. Community advisory boards will be established for the selection of single-component or multi-faceted guideline implementation strategies. The tailoring approach considers guideline, provider and organizational factors shaping implementation. In field tests quality outcome indicators of the delivery of evidence-based interventions will be evaluated accompanied by a process evaluation to examine patient, provider and organizational factors. Outlook: This project will support the translation of guideline recommendations for the identification, prevention and treatment of AUD in routine practice and therefore contributes to the reduction of alcohol-related burden in Germany. The project is running since October 2017 and will provide its main outcomes by end of 2020. Project results will be published in scientific journals and presented at national and international conferences.

scholarly journals Evaluation of current practice: compliance with osteoporosis clinical guidelines in an outpatient fracture clinic

2008 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheryl M Kimber ◽  
Karen A Grimmer-Somers
Keyword(s):  
Best Practice ◽  
Guideline Implementation ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Fracture Prevention ◽  
Wrist Fracture ◽  
Fracture Clinic ◽  
Quality Guidelines ◽  
Sustainable Implementation ◽  
Metropolitan Hospital ◽  
Future Fracture

Better detection and management of osteoporosis will reduce unnecessary health expenditure. A number of high quality guidelines are available to support early detection and best practice management of osteoporosis in hospital settings. However, sustainable implementation of guidelines poses practical issues in terms of structure and processes in hospitals. This paper describes an investigation into guideline compliance in one large tertiary metropolitan hospital and discusses practical elements of guideline implementation. Given the evidence of poor practice across the two audit periods, we recommend that a coordinated clinical pathway be implemented in the fracture clinic, supported by a targeted and disciplinespecific training program. Small steps towards improving awareness and management of osteoporosis in patients presenting for the first time with non-trauma wrist fracture may well produce large cost savings by future fracture prevention.

Postmarketing Surveillance Based on Electronic Patient Records: The IPCI Project

1999 ◽  
Vol 38 (04/05) ◽  
pp. 339-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. van der Lei ◽  
B. M. Th. Mosseveld ◽  
M. A. M. van Wijk ◽  
P. D. van der Linden ◽  
M. C. J. M. Sturkenboom ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Practitioner ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Validation Studies ◽  
Resource Planning ◽  
Routine Practice ◽  
Patient Records ◽  
Postmarketing Surveillance ◽  
Electronic Patient Records ◽  
Use Of Data ◽  
Data Requirements

AbstractResearchers claim that data in electronic patient records can be used for a variety of purposes including individual patient care, management, and resource planning for scientific research. Our objective in the project Integrated Primary Care Information (IPCI) was to assess whether the electronic patient records of Dutch general practitioners contain sufficient data to perform studies in the area of postmarketing surveillance studies. We determined the data requirements for postmarketing surveil-lance studies, implemented additional software in the electronic patient records of the general practitioner, developed an organization to monitor the use of data, and performed validation studies to test the quality of the data. Analysis of the data requirements showed that additional software had to be installed to collect data that is not recorded in routine practice. To avoid having to obtain informed consent from each enrolled patient, we developed IPCI as a semianonymous system: both patients and participating general practitioners are anonymous for the researchers. Under specific circumstances, the researcher can contact indirectly (through a trusted third party) the physician that made the data available. Only the treating general practitioner is able to decode the identity of his patients. A Board of Supervisors predominantly consisting of participating general practitioners monitors the use of data. Validation studies show the data can be used for postmarketing surveillance. With additional software to collect data not normally recorded in routine practice, data from electronic patient record of general practitioners can be used for postmarketing surveillance.

scholarly journals Making your geriatric and palliative programs a strength: TQIP guideline implementation and the VRC perspective

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e000677
Author(s):  
Vanessa P Ho ◽  
Sasha D Adams ◽  
Kathleen M O'Connell ◽  
Christine S Cocanour ◽  
Saman Arbabi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Guideline Implementation ◽  
Geriatric Trauma ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Best Practice Guidelines ◽  
American College Of Surgeons ◽  
Specialized Care ◽  
The Usa

BackgroundOlder patients compose approximately 30% of trauma patients treated in the USA but make up nearly 50% of deaths from trauma. To help standardize and elevate care of these patients, the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Trauma Quality Improvement Program’s best practice guidelines for geriatric trauma management was published in 2013 and that for palliative care was published in 2017. Here, we discuss how palliative care and geriatrics quality metrics can be tracked and used for performance improvement and leveraged as a strength for trauma verification.MethodsWe discuss the viewpoint of the ACS Verification, Review, and Consultation and three case studies, with practical tips and takeaways, of how these measures have been implemented at different institutions.ResultsWe describe the use of (1) targeted educational initiatives, (2) development of a consultation tool based on institutional resources, and (3) application of a nurse-led frailty screen.DiscussionSpecialized care and attention to these vulnerable populations is recommended, but the implementation of these programs can take many shapes.Level of evidence V

The SIEP-DIRECT's Project on the discrepancy between routine practice and evidence. An outline of main findings and practical implications for the future of community based mental health services

2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 358-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirella Ruggeri ◽  
Antonio Lora ◽  
Domenico Semisa
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Guideline Implementation ◽  
Specific Treatment ◽  
Care Process ◽  
First Episode ◽  
Routine Practice ◽  
Nice Guidelines ◽  
Illness Onset

SUMMARYAims– To highlight the major discrepancies that emerged between evidence and routine practice in the framework of the SIEP-DIRECT's Project (DIscrepancy betweenRoutine practice andEvidence in psychiatricCommunityTreatments onSchizophrenia). The Project was conducted in 19 Italian mental health services (MHS), with the aims of: a) evaluating the appropriateness of the NICE Guidelines for Schizophrenia in the Italian context, b) developing and testing a set of 103 indicators that operationalised preferred clinical practice requirements according to the NICE Guidelines, and c) evaluating their actual application in Italian MHSs.Methods– The indicators investigated five different areas: common elements in all phases of schizophrenia; first episode treatment; crisis treatment; promoting recovery; the aggressive behaviour management.Results– The NICE recommendations examined were judged in most instances to be appropriate to the Italian MHS context, and the indicators fairly easy to use. The more severe and frequently encountered evidence-practice discrepancies were: lack of written material, guidelines, and information to be systematically provided to users; lack of intervention monitoring and evaluation; difficulty in implementingspecific and structured forms of intervention; difficulty in considering patients' family members as figures requiring targeted support themselves and who should also be regularly involved in the patient care process.Conclusions– The key actions to be undertaken to favour implementation of evidence-based routine practices are: focussing on mental illness onset and family support/involvement in care; planning training activities aimed at achieving specific treatment goals; encouraging MHS participation in evaluation activities; identifying thresholds for guideline application and promoting specific guideline implementation actions; and activating decision making and resource allocationprocesses that rely more strictly on evidence and epidemiological assessment. These considerations are of value for rethinking the model of community psychiatry in Italy as well as in other countries.Declaration of Interest: None.

Translation Research in Practice: An Introduction

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marita Titler
Keyword(s):  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Population Health ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Improve Patient Care ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Routine Practice ◽  
Translation Research ◽  
Introductory Overview ◽  
Improve Patient

Translation science is a relatively young area of investigation that is rapidly growing. Although a number of healthcare practices have an evidence-base to guide care delivery, their use is not a part of routine practice. The gap between the availability of evidence-based practice (EBP) recommendations and application to improve patient care and population health is linked to poor health outcomes. Translation science, also known as implementation science, is testing implementation interventions to improve uptake and use of evidence to improve patient outcomes and population health. It also helps clarify what implementation strategies work for whom, in what settings, and why. This scientific field emerged to investigate which implementation strategies work to promote use of EBPs, and uncover the mechanisms by which they work. Advancements in translation science can expedite and sustain the successful integration of evidence in practice to improve care delivery, population health, and health outcomes. This article offers an introductory overview of translation science and addresses issues in this field of science such as variation in terminology; theories and models; implementation strategies; and context and implementation related to EBPs.

The process of sourcing and preparing electronic health records data to implement a machine-learning algorithm for early identification of maternal cardiovascular risk (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nawar Shara ◽  
Kelley M. Anderson ◽  
Noor Falah ◽  
Maryam F. Ahmad ◽  
Darya Tavazoei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Electronic Health Records ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Early Identification ◽  
Health Data ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Patient Records ◽  
Health Records ◽  
Electronic Health

BACKGROUND Healthcare data are fragmenting as patients seek care from diverse sources. Consequently, patient care is negatively impacted by disparate health records. Machine learning (ML) offers a disruptive force in its ability to inform and improve patient care and outcomes [6]. However, the differences that exist in each individual’s health records, combined with the lack of health-data standards, in addition to systemic issues that render the data unreliable and that fail to create a single view of each patient, create challenges for ML. While these problems exist throughout healthcare, they are especially prevalent within maternal health, and exacerbate the maternal morbidity and mortality (MMM) crisis in the United States. OBJECTIVE Maternal patient records were extracted from the electronic health records (EHRs) of a large tertiary healthcare system and made into patient-specific, complete datasets through a systematic method so that a machine-learning-based (ML-based) risk-assessment algorithm could effectively identify maternal cardiovascular risk prior to evidence of diagnosis or intervention within the patient’s record. METHODS We outline the effort that was required to define the specifications of the computational systems, the dataset, and access to relevant systems, while ensuring data security, privacy laws, and policies were met. Data acquisition included the concatenation, anonymization, and normalization of health data across multiple EHRs in preparation for its use by a proprietary risk-stratification algorithm designed to establish patient-specific baselines to identify and establish cardiovascular risk based on deviations from the patient’s baselines to inform early interventions. RESULTS Patient records can be made actionable for the goal of effectively employing machine learning (ML), specifically to identify cardiovascular risk in pregnant patients. CONCLUSIONS Upon acquiring data, including the concatenation, anonymization, and normalization of said data across multiple EHRs, the use of a machine-learning-based (ML-based) tool can provide early identification of cardiovascular risk in pregnant patients. CLINICALTRIAL N/A

Why we still prescribe so many opioids: A qualitative study on barriers and facilitators to prescribing guideline implementation

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-124
Author(s):  
Kathryn W. Zavaleta, MHSA ◽  
Lindsey M. Philpot, PhD, MPH ◽  
Julie L. Cunningham, PharmD, RPh ◽  
Halena M. Gazelka, MD ◽  
Holly L. Geyer, MD ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Best Practice ◽  
Guideline Implementation ◽  
Healthcare Setting ◽  
Medical Specialty ◽  
Critical Systems ◽  
Healthcare Organizations ◽  
Opioid Prescribing ◽  
Daunting Challenge ◽  
Additional Education ◽  
Safe Opioid Prescribing

Introduction: Opioid prescribing occurs within almost every healthcare setting. Implementation of safe, effective opioid stewardship programs represents a critical but daunting challenge for medical leaders. This study sought to understand the barriers and aids to the routine use of clinical guidelines for opioid prescribing among healthcare professionals and to identify areas in need of additional education for prescribing providers, pharmacists, and nurses.Methods: Data collection and analysis in 2018-2019 employed a team of two trained facilitators who conducted 20 focus groups using a structured facilitation guide to explore operational, interpersonal, and patient care-related barriers to best practice adherence. Each professional group was interviewed separately, with similar care settings assigned together. Invitation to participate was based on a sampling methodology representing emergency, medical specialty, primary care, and surgical practice settings.Results: Key concerns among all groups reflected the inadequacy of available tools for staff to appropriately assess and treat patients’ pain. Tools and technology to support safe opioid prescribing were also cited as a barrier by all three professional groups. All groups noted that prescribers tend to rely upon default settings within the electronic medical record when issuing prescriptions. Both pharmacists and prescribers cited time and scheduling as a barrier to adherence.Conclusions: In spite of significant regulatory and public policy efforts to address the opioid crisis, healthcare organizations face significant challenges to improve adherence to best practice prescribing guidelines. These findings highlight several facilitators for change which could boost opioid stewardship initiatives to focus on critical systems’ factors for improvement.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document