Orientation Discrimination for Moving Isoluminant and Luminance Targets
Last year we presented orientation discrimination thresholds for stationary isoluminant red — green and luminance-defined stimuli as a function of spatial frequency and contrast (Wuerger and Morgan, 1995 Perception24 Supplement, 16). The horizontal profile of the stimuli was a Gabor function with a carrier frequency of either 0, 2, or 4 cycles deg−1. Observers made a binary decision (clockwise versus anticlockwise from vertical) and thresholds were defined as the standard deviation of their psychometric function. One main finding was that for carrier frequencies of 2 and 4 cycles deg−1, when stimuli of equal cone contrast are compared, orientation discrimination thresholds for red — green isoluminant stimuli do not differ significantly from the thresholds for luminance-defined stimuli. To further characterise the chromatic mechanisms involved in spatial vision, we assessed orientation discrimination thresholds for isoluminant red — green and luminance-defined Gabor stimuli as a function of the velocity of the moving target. When velocity is increased, orientation discrimination thresholds for isoluminant targets increase more rapidly than the thresholds for luminance targets of identical cone contrasts. We conclude that orientation discrimination is mediated by different chromatic mechanisms with different spatial and temporal sensitivities.