The Respective Role of Low and High Spatial Frequencies in Supporting Configural and Featural Processing of Faces

Perception ◽  
10.1068/p5370 ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valérie Goffaux ◽  
Barbara Hault ◽  
Caroline Michel ◽  
Quoc C Vuong ◽  
Bruno Rossion
Perception ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 42 (11) ◽  
pp. 1151-1157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana Fiorentini ◽  
Lamberto Maffei ◽  
Giulio Sandini

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 543-564
Author(s):  
Evelyne Lagrange

Abstract The true designer of the High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) might have been a French professor of international law, Paul Reuter (1911–1990). Then working in the shadow of Jean Monnet, he became one of the leading experts in public international law in France from the late 1950s on and also served on the International Law Commission. It was not his style to develop a fully-fledged theory of functionalism, but he paid the utmost attention to the ‘functions’ of international organizations. While demonstrating a certain reluctance towards some consequences associated with functionalism, he expressed no disdain for a lite version of ‘constitutionalism’. Discretely, Reuter outlined a balancing between ‘functionalism’ and ‘constitutionalism’. He more insistently elaborated on the respective role of experts and policy-makers.


Perception ◽  
10.1068/p6878 ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 761-784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone K Favelle ◽  
Stephen Palmisano ◽  
Georgina Avery
Keyword(s):  

2006 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Seidl

Drawing on Wittgenstein, Lyotard and Luhmann the article develops a systemic-discursive perspective on the field of strategy and the respective role of general strategy concepts. The perspective suggests that the field of strategy should not be conceptualized as a unified field but rather as fragmented into a multitude of autonomous discourses. Owing to their autonomy, no transfer of strategy concepts across different discourses is possible. Instead, every single strategy discourse can merely construct its own discourse-specific concepts. Different discourses, however, draw on the same strategy labels, which leads to ‘productive misunderstandings’ (Teubner). On the basis of the particular perspective advanced here, the entire field of strategy is re-described as an ecology of strategy discourses.


1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. 1025-1031 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Oswald ◽  
Olivier Clement ◽  
Catherine Chambon ◽  
Elisabeth Schouman-Claeys ◽  
Guy Frija

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document