Driving Experience and the Functional Field of View

Perception ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
pp. 1075-1087 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Crundall ◽  
Geoffrey Underwood ◽  
Peter Chapman
Perception ◽  
10.1068/p2894 ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
pp. 1075-1087 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Crundall ◽  
Geoffrey Underwood ◽  
Peter Chapman

Perception ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (9) ◽  
pp. 769-795 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilja T. Feldstein

The human egocentric perception of approaching objects and the related perceptual processes have been of interest to researchers for several decades. This article gives a literature review on numerous studies that investigated the phenomenon when an object approaches an observer (or the other way around) with the goal to single out factors that influence the perceptual process. A taxonomy of metrics is followed by a breakdown of different experimental measurement methods. Thereinafter, potential factors affecting the judgment of approaching objects are compiled and debated while divided into human factors (e.g., gender, age, and driving experience), compositional factors (e.g., approaching velocity, spatial distance, and observation time), and technical factors (e.g., field of view, stereoscopy, and display contrast). Experimental findings are collated, juxtaposed, and critically discussed. With virtual-reality devices having taken a tremendous developmental leap forward in the past few years, they have been able to gain ground in experimental research. Therefore, special attention in this article is also given to the perception of approaching objects in virtual environments and put in contrast to the perception in reality.


2017 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laurent Itti

AbstractHulleman & Olivers (H&O) make a much-needed stride forward for a better understanding of visual search behavior by rejecting theories based on discrete stimulus items. I propose that the framework could be further enhanced by clearly delineating distinct mechanisms for attention guidance, selection, and enhancement during visual search, instead of conflating them into a single functional field of view.


2001 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
pp. 361-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wataru Oue ◽  
Yuji Hakoda ◽  
Natsuko Onuma ◽  
Shinichi Morikawa

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. e0133237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongning Song ◽  
Yuji Hakoda ◽  
Wakako Sanefuji ◽  
Chen Cheng

1986 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 611-612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonard J. Williams

The functional field of view appears to be sensitive to various cognitive load manipulations of foveal portions of displays. Several studies are summarized which provide considerable evidence for a kind of tunnel-vision which is induced via cognitive loading.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document