Perceptual, Oculomotor, and Neural Responses to Moving Color Plaids

Perception ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 681-709 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen R Dobkins ◽  
Gene R Stoner ◽  
Thomas D Albright
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Motion ◽  
Human Subjects ◽  
Phase Relationship ◽  
Neural Mechanism ◽  
Luminance Contrast ◽  
Motion Processing ◽  
Motion Coherence ◽  
Bright Green ◽  
Phase Relationships

Moving plaids constructed from two achromatic gratings of identical luminance contrast are known to yield a percept of coherent pattern motion, as are plaids constructed from two identical chromatic (eg isoluminant red/green) gratings. To examine the interactive influences of chromatic and luminance contrast on the integration of visual motion signals, we constructed plaids with gratings that possessed both forms of contrast. We used plaids of two basic types, which differed with respect to the phase relationship between chromatic and luminance modulations (after Kooi et al, 1992 Perception21 583–598). One plaid type (‘symmetric’) was made from component gratings that had identical chromatic/luminance phase relationships (eg both components were red-bright/green-dark modulation). The second plaid type (‘asymmetric’) was made from components that had complimentary phase relationships (ie one red-bright/green-dark grating and one green-bright/red-dark grating). Human subjects reported that the motion of symmetric plaids was perceptually coherent, while the components of asymmetric plaids failed to cohere. We also recorded eye movements elicited by both types of plaids to determine if they are similarly affected by these image cues for motion coherence. Results demonstrate that, under many conditions, eye movements elicited by perceptually coherent vs noncoherent plaids are distinguishable from one another. To reveal the neural bases of these perceptual and oculomotor phenomena, we also recorded the responses of neurons in the middle temporal visual area (area MT) of macaque visual cortex. Here we found that individual neurons exhibited differential tuning to symmetric vs asymmetric plaids. These neurophysiological results demonstrate that the neural mechanism for motion coherence is sensitive to the phase relationship between chromatic and luminance contrast, a finding which has implications for interactions between ‘color’ and ‘motion’ processing streams in the primate visual system.

scholarly journals Motion Coherence and Luminance Contrast Interact in Driving Visual Gamma-Band Activity

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franziska Pellegrini ◽  
David J Hawellek ◽  
Anna-Antonia Pape ◽  
Joerg F Hipp ◽  
Markus Siegel
Keyword(s):  
Visual Motion ◽  
Human Subjects ◽  
Luminance Contrast ◽  
Gamma Band ◽  
Visual Features ◽  
Population Activity ◽  
Bottom Up ◽  
Motion Coherence ◽  
Gamma Band Activity ◽  
Band Activity

Abstract Synchronized neuronal population activity in the gamma-frequency range (>30 Hz) correlates with the bottom-up drive of various visual features. It has been hypothesized that gamma-band synchronization enhances the gain of neuronal representations, yet evidence remains sparse. We tested a critical prediction of the gain hypothesis, which is that features that drive synchronized gamma-band activity interact super-linearly. To test this prediction, we employed whole-head magnetencephalography in human subjects and investigated if the strength of visual motion (motion coherence) and luminance contrast interact in driving gamma-band activity in visual cortex. We found that gamma-band activity (64–128 Hz) monotonically increased with coherence and contrast, while lower frequency activity (8–32 Hz) decreased with both features. Furthermore, as predicted for a gain mechanism, we found a multiplicative interaction between motion coherence and contrast in their joint drive of gamma-band activity. The lower frequency activity did not show such an interaction. Our findings provide evidence that gamma-band activity acts as a cortical gain mechanism that nonlinearly combines the bottom-up drive of different visual features.

scholarly journals Motion Coherence and Luminance Contrast Interact in Driving Visual Gamma-Band Activity

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franziska Pellegrini ◽  
David J Hawellek ◽  
Anna-Antonia Pape ◽  
Joerg F Hipp ◽  
Markus Siegel
Keyword(s):  
Visual Motion ◽  
Human Subjects ◽  
Luminance Contrast ◽  
Gamma Band ◽  
Visual Features ◽  
Population Activity ◽  
Bottom Up ◽  
Motion Coherence ◽  
Gamma Band Activity ◽  
Band Activity

AbstractSynchronized neuronal population activity in the gamma-frequency range (> 30 Hz) correlates with the bottom-up drive of various visual features. It has been hypothesized that gamma-band synchronization enhances the gain of neuronal representations, yet evidence remains sparse. We tested a critical prediction of the gain hypothesis, which is that features that drive synchronized gamma-band activity interact super-linearly. To test this prediction, we employed whole-head magnetencephalography (MEG) in human subjects and investigated if the strength of visual motion (motion coherence) and luminance contrast interact in driving gamma-band activity in visual cortex. We found that gamma-band activity (64 to 128 Hz) monotonically increased with coherence and contrast while lower frequency activity (8 to 32 Hz) decreased with both features. Furthermore, as predicted for a gain mechanism, we found a multiplicative interaction between motion coherence and contrast in their joint drive of gamma-band activity. The lower frequency activity did not show such an interaction. Our findings provide evidence, that gamma-band activity acts as a cortical gain mechanism that nonlinearly combines the bottom-up drive of different visual features in support of visually guided behavior.

Pursuit and optokinetic deficits following chemical lesions of cortical areas MT and MST

1988 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 940-965 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. R. Dursteler ◽  
R. H. Wurtz
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Field ◽  
Visual Motion ◽  
Ibotenic Acid ◽  
Motion Processing ◽  
Temporal Area ◽  
Target Speed ◽  
Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Medial Superior Temporal ◽  
Visual Motion Processing

1. Previous experiments have shown that punctate chemical lesions within the middle temporal area (MT) of the superior temporal sulcus (STS) produce deficits in the initiation and maintenance of pursuit eye movements (10, 34). The present experiments were designed to test the effect of such chemical lesions in an area within the STS to which MT projects, the medial superior temporal area (MST). 2. We injected ibotenic acid into localized regions of MST, and we observed two deficits in pursuit eye movements, a retinotopic deficit and a directional deficit. 3. The retinotopic deficit in pursuit initiation was characterized by the monkey's inability to match eye speed to target speed or to adjust the amplitude of the saccade made to acquire the target to compensate for target motion. This deficit was related to the initiation of pursuit to targets moving in any direction in the visual field contralateral to the side of the brain with the lesion. This deficit was similar to the deficit we found following damage to extrafoveal MT except that the affected area of the visual field frequently extended throughout the entire contralateral visual field tested. 4. The directional deficit in pursuit maintenance was characterized by a failure to match eye speed to target speed once the fovea had been brought near the moving target. This deficit occurred only when the target was moving toward the side of the lesion, regardless of whether the target began to move in the ipsilateral or contralateral visual field. There was no deficit in the amplitude of saccades made to acquire the target, or in the amplitude of the catch-up saccades made to compensate for the slowed pursuit. The directional deficit is similar to the one we described previously following chemical lesions of the foveal representation in the STS. 5. Retinotopic deficits resulted from any of our injections in MST. Directional deficits resulted from lesions limited to subregions within MST, particularly lesions that invaded the floor of the STS and the posterior bank of the STS just lateral to MT. Extensive damage to the densely myelinated area of the anterior bank or to the posterior parietal area on the dorsal lip of the anterior bank produced minimal directional deficits. 6. We conclude that damage to visual motion processing in MST underlies the retinotopic pursuit deficit just as it does in MT. MST appears to be a sequential step in visual motion processing that occurs before all of the visual motion information is transmitted to the brainstem areas related to pursuit.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Local and Global Representations of Velocity: Transparency, Opponency, and Global Direction Perception

Perception ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 995-1010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver Braddick
Keyword(s):  
Visual Motion ◽  
Multiple Scales ◽  
Human Subjects ◽  
Motion Processing ◽  
Spatial Integration ◽  
Local Motion ◽  
Directional Information ◽  
Object Based ◽  
Transparent Display ◽  
Winner Take All

Human subjects can perceive global motion or motions in displays containing diverse local motions, implying representation of velocity at multiple scales. The phenomena of flexible global direction judgments, and especially of motion transparency, also raise the issue of whether the representation of velocity at any one scale is single-valued or multi-valued. A new performance-based measure of transparency confirms that the visual system represents directional information for each component of a transparent display. However, results with the locally paired random-dot display introduced by Qian et al, show that representations of multiple velocities do not coexist at the finest spatial scale of motion analysis. Functionally distinct scales of motion processing may be associated with (i) local motion detectors which show a strong winner-take-all interaction; (ii) spatial integration of local signals to disambiguate velocity; (iii) selection of reliable velocity signals as proposed in the model of Nowlan and Sejnowski; (iv) object-based or surface-based representations that are not necessarily organised in a fixed spatial matrix. These possibilities are discussed in relation to the neurobiological organisation of the visual motion pathway.

Eye Movements in Response to Dichoptic Motion: Evidence for a Parallel-Hierarchical Structure of Visual Motion Processing in Primates

2008 ◽  
Vol 99 (5) ◽  
pp. 2329-2346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryusuke Hayashi ◽  
Kenichiro Miura ◽  
Hiromitsu Tabata ◽  
Kenji Kawano
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Motion ◽  
Large Field ◽  
Motion Processing ◽  
Motion Cues ◽  
First Order ◽  
Visual Motion Processing ◽  
Ocular Following ◽  
Winner Take All ◽  
Take All

Brief movements of a large-field visual stimulus elicit short-latency tracking eye movements termed “ocular following responses” (OFRs). To address the question of whether OFRs can be elicited by purely binocular motion signals in the absence of monocular motion cues, we measured OFRs from monkeys using dichoptic motion stimuli, the monocular inputs of which were flickering gratings in spatiotemporal quadrature, and compared them with OFRs to standard motion stimuli including monocular motion cues. Dichoptic motion did elicit OFRs, although with longer latencies and smaller amplitudes. In contrast to these findings, we observed that other types of motion stimuli categorized as non-first-order motion, which is undetectable by detectors for standard luminance-defined (first-order) motion, did not elicit OFRs, although they did evoke the sensation of motion. These results indicate that OFRs can be driven solely by cortical visual motion processing after binocular integration, which is distinct from the process incorporating non-first-order motion for elaborated motion perception. To explore the nature of dichoptic motion processing in terms of interaction with monocular motion processing, we further recorded OFRs from both humans and monkeys using our novel motion stimuli, the monocular and dichoptic motion signals of which move in opposite directions with a variable motion intensity ratio. We found that monocular and dichoptic motion signals are processed in parallel to elicit OFRs, rather than suppressing each other in a winner-take-all fashion, and the results were consistent across the species.

The effect of a moving distractor on the initiation of smooth-pursuit eye movements

1997 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 323-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent P. Ferrera ◽  
Stephen G. Lisberger
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Smooth Pursuit ◽  
Visual Motion ◽  
Target Selection ◽  
Motion Processing ◽  
Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Response Preparation ◽  
Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Motion Processing

AbstractAs a step toward understanding the mechanism by which targets are selected for smooth-pursuit eye movements, we examined the behavior of the pursuit system when monkeys were presented with two discrete moving visual targets. Two rhesus monkeys were trained to select a small moving target identified by its color in the presence of a moving distractor of another color. Smooth-pursuit eye movements were quantified in terms of the latency of the eye movement and the initial eye acceleration profile. We have previously shown that the latency of smooth pursuit, which is normally around 100 ms, can be extended to 150 ms or shortened to 85 ms depending on whether there is a distractor moving in the opposite or same direction, respectively, relative to the direction of the target. We have now measured this effect for a 360 deg range of distractor directions, and distractor speeds of 5–45 deg/s. We have also examined the effect of varying the spatial separation and temporal asynchrony between target and distractor. The results indicate that the effect of the distractor on the latency of pursuit depends on its direction of motion, and its spatial and temporal proximity to the target, but depends very little on the speed of the distractor. Furthermore, under the conditions of these experiments, the direction of the eye movement that is emitted in response to two competing moving stimuli is not a vectorial combination of the stimulus motions, but is solely determined by the direction of the target. The results are consistent with a competitive model for smooth-pursuit target selection and suggest that the competition takes place at a stage of the pursuit pathway that is between visual-motion processing and motor-response preparation.

scholarly journals Integration of visual motion and pursuit signals in areas V3A and V6+ across cortical depth using 9.4T fMRI

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatemeh Molaei Vaneghi ◽  
Natalia Zaretskaya ◽  
Tim van Mourik ◽  
Jonas Bause ◽  
Klaus Scheffler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Motion ◽  
Human Subjects ◽  
Special Contribution ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Perceptual Stability ◽  
Differential Motion ◽  
Retinal Motion ◽  
Motion Responses ◽  
High Level

Neural mechanisms underlying a stable perception of the world during pursuit eye movements are not fully understood. Both, perceptual stability as well as perception of real (i.e. objective) motion are the product of integration between motion signals on the retina and efference copies of eye movements. Human areas V3A and V6 have previously been shown to have strong objective ('real') motion responses. Here we used high-resolution laminar fMRI at ultra-high magnetic field (9.4T) in human subjects to examine motion integration across cortical depths in these areas. We found an increased preference for objective motion in areas V3A and V6+ i.e. V6 and possibly V6A towards the upper layers. When laminar responses were detrended to remove the upper-layer bias present in all responses, we found a unique, condition-specific laminar profile in V6+, showing reduced mid-layer responses for retinal motion only. The results provide evidence for differential, motion-type dependent laminar processing in area V6+. Mechanistically, the mid-layer dip suggests a special contribution of retinal motion to integration, either in the form of a subtractive (inhibitory) mid-layer input, or in the form of feedback into extragranular or infragranular layers. The results show that differential laminar signals can be measured in high-level motion areas in human occipitoparietal cortex, opening the prospect of new mechanistic insights using non-invasive brain imaging.

scholarly journals Comparing the influence of stimulus size and contrast on the perception of moving gratings and random dot patterns—A registered report protocol

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. e0253067
Author(s):  
Benedict Wild ◽  
Stefan Treue
Keyword(s):  
Motion Perception ◽  
Visual Motion ◽  
Human Subjects ◽  
Motion Processing ◽  
Temporal Area ◽  
Middle Temporal ◽  
Processing Pipeline ◽  
Visual Motion Processing ◽  
Primate Brain ◽  
Random Dot Patterns

Modern accounts of visual motion processing in the primate brain emphasize a hierarchy of different regions within the dorsal visual pathway, especially primary visual cortex (V1) and the middle temporal area (MT). However, recent studies have called the idea of a processing pipeline with fixed contributions to motion perception from each area into doubt. Instead, the role that each area plays appears to depend on properties of the stimulus as well as perceptual history. We propose to test this hypothesis in human subjects by comparing motion perception of two commonly used stimulus types: drifting sinusoidal gratings (DSGs) and random dot patterns (RDPs). To avoid potential biases in our approach we are pre-registering our study. We will compare the effects of size and contrast levels on the perception of the direction of motion for DSGs and RDPs. In addition, based on intriguing results in a pilot study, we will also explore the effects of a post-stimulus mask. Our approach will offer valuable insights into how motion is processed by the visual system and guide further behavioral and neurophysiological research.

Topographic and directional organization of visual motion inputs for the initiation of horizontal and vertical smooth-pursuit eye movements in monkeys

1989 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 173-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. G. Lisberger ◽  
T. A. Pavelko
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Field ◽  
Visual Motion ◽  
Target Position ◽  
Target Motion ◽  
Visual Signals ◽  
Motion Processing ◽  
Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Inputs ◽  
Initial Target

1. The goal of our study was to determine the properties of the visual inputs for pursuit eye movements. In a previous study we presented horizontal target motion along the horizontal meridian and showed that targets were more effective if they moved across the center of the visual field. We have now analyzed the topographic weighting of the inputs for pursuit in greater detail, using targets that moved in all directions and across a wide area of the visual field. 2. Monkeys were rewarded for tracking targets that started at 48 positions in the visual field. The initial positions were spaced equally around 4 circles that were centered at the position of fixation and had radii of 3, 6, 9, and 12 degrees. Targets moved horizontally or vertically at 30 degrees/s. We measured the smooth eye acceleration in the first 80 ms after the initiation of pursuit, before there had been time for visual feedback to affect the position or velocity of the retinal images from the target. 3. For both horizontal and vertical target motion, there were major differences between the early and late intervals in the first 80 ms of pursuit. In the first 20 ms eye acceleration was largely independent of initial target position. In later intervals eye acceleration decreased sharply as a function of initial target eccentricity. The later intervals also showed a pronounced toward/away asymmetry such that the initiation of pursuit was more vigorous for target motion toward than for motion away from the horizontal or vertical meridian. 4. Comparison of the topographic organization of the middle temporal visual area (MT) with our data on pursuit suggests that the topography of cortical maps is smoothed when the visual signals are transmitted to the pursuit system. For example, the superior visual hemifield is underrepresented in cortical motion processing areas, but target motion in the superior and inferior visual hemifields is equally effective for the initiation of pursuit. 5. We investigated the directional organization of the visual inputs for pursuit by presenting targets that started at 6 degrees eccentric and moved in 16 different directions. Horizontal target motion always evoked larger eye accelerations than did vertical target motion. Target motion in oblique directions evoked intermediate values of eye acceleration. 6. Our data show two classes of variation in pursuit performance. First, some subjects showed ideosyncratic variations that were restricted to one hemifield or one direction of target motion. We attribute these variations to differences among subjects in the physiology of visual pathways.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Relation of cortical areas MT and MST to pursuit eye movements. I. Localization and visual properties of neurons

1988 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 580-603 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Komatsu ◽  
R. H. Wurtz
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Smooth Pursuit ◽  
Visual Motion ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Motion Processing ◽  
Temporal Area ◽  
Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Visual Motion Processing ◽  
Visual Areas ◽  
Visual Properties

1. Among the multiple extrastriate visual areas in monkey cerebral cortex, several areas within the superior temporal sulcus (STS) are selectively related to visual motion processing. In this series of experiments we have attempted to relate this visual motion processing at a neuronal level to a behavior that is dependent on such processing, the generation of smooth-pursuit eye movements. 2. We studied two visual areas within the STS, the middle temporal area (MT) and the medial superior temporal area (MST). For the purposes of this study, MT and MST were defined functionally as those areas within the STS having a high proportion of directionally selective neurons. MST was distinguished from MT by using the established relationship of receptive-field size to eccentricity, with MST having larger receptive fields than MT. 3. A subset of these visually responsive cells within the STS were identified as pursuit cells--those cells that discharge during smooth pursuit of a small target in an otherwise dark room. Pursuit cells were found only in localized regions--in the foveal region of MT (MTf), in a dorsal-medial area of MST on the anterior bank of the STS (MSTd), and in a lateral-anterior area of MST on the floor and the posterior bank of the STS (MST1). 4. Pursuit cells showed two characteristics in common when their visual properties were studied while the monkey was fixating. Almost all cells showed direction selectivity for moving stimuli and included the fovea within their receptive fields. 5. The visual response of pursuit cells in the several areas differed in two ways. Cells in MTf preferred small moving spots of light, whereas cells in MSTd preferred large moving stimuli, such as a pattern of random dots. Cells in MTf had small receptive fields; those in MSTd usually had large receptive fields. Visual responses of pursuit neurons in MST1 were heterogeneous; some resembled those in MTf, whereas others were similar to those in MSTd. This suggests that the pursuit cells in MSTd and MST1 belong to different subregions of MST.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document