Illusory-Contour Formation Affected by Luminance Contrast Polarity

Perception ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 313-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zijiang J He ◽  
Teng Leng Ooi

We report a new type of illusory contour (Illusory-O) whose formation is contingent upon the contrast polarity of its juxtaposed inducing elements being similar, ie both elements must either be positive or negative in contrast sign. To test the hypothesis that this contingency is primarily dictated by factors that determine amodal surface completion (occlusion) between the inducing elements we conducted a series of experiments employing known spatial properties of the amodal completion mechanism, to show that spatial conditions unfavorable to occlusion lead to a concurrent weakening of the Illusory-O formation. For instance, we found that when the juxtaposed inducing elements (solid rectangles) were spatially misaligned, or when their spatial separation increased, our observers rated the perception of the Illusory-O as reduced. We also showed that, in addition to using solid-form inducing elements, the Illusory-O can be induced by line terminals, as long as these lines respect the requirements of the amodal completion mechanism such as similar contrast polarity and spatial alignment. Then we demonstrated that the role of the amodal completion mechanism is not limited to our particular arrangement of inducing elements by showing that the formation of the illusory Necker cube also relies on similar contrast polarity. Finally, to explain why some illusory contours like the Illusory-O are dependent on contrast polarity while others (eg Kanizsa square) are not, we propose that the key rests upon the visual system's presumption of occlusion. That is, in forming the illusory contour, if the visual system infers that it is a byproduct of the inducing elements being occluded, then having inducing elements of similar contrast polarity becomes a prerequisite. This assumption can be traced to the occurrence in the real world where partially occluded objects usually have visible parts (on both ends) with similar contrast polarity. Along this line of thinking, we suggest a plausible neural circuitry that may be implemented to form both contrast polarity sensitive and insensitive types of illusory contours.

Perception ◽  
10.1068/p3305 ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 31 (9) ◽  
pp. 1037-1045 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benoit A Bacon ◽  
Pascal Mamassian

Half-occlusions and illusory contours have recently been used to show that depth can be perceived in the absence of binocular correspondence and that there is more to stereopsis than solving the correspondence problem. In the present study we show a new way for depth to be assigned in the absence of binocular correspondence, namely amodal completion. Although an occluder removed all possibility of direct binocular matching, subjects consistently assigned the correct depth (convexity or concavity) to partially occluded ‘folded cards’ stimuli. Our results highlight the importance of more global, surface-based processes in stereopsis.


Perception ◽  
10.1068/p5274 ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 34 (9) ◽  
pp. 1083-1094 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip M Grove ◽  
Jessica M Byrne ◽  
Barbara J Gillam

A partially occluded contour and a slanted contour may generate identical binocular horizontal disparities. We investigated conditions promoting an occlusion resolution indicated by an illusory contour in depth along the aligned ends of horizontally disparate line sets. For a set of identical oblique lines with a constant width added to one eye's view, strength, depth, and stability of the illusory contour were poor, whereas for oblique lines of alternating orientations the illusory contours were strong, indicating a reliance on vertical size disparities rather than vertical positional disparities in generating perceived occlusion. For horizontal lines, occlusion was seen when the lines were of different lengths and absolute width disparity was invariant across the set. In all line configurations, when the additional length was on the wrong eye to be attributed to differential occlusion, lines appeared slanted consistent with their individual horizontal disparities. This rules out monocular illusory contours as the determining factor.


Perception ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 24 (11) ◽  
pp. 1333-1364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lothar Spillmann ◽  
Birgitta Dresp

The study of illusory brightness and contour phenomena has become an important tool in modern brain research. Gestalt, cognitive, neural, and computational approaches are reviewed and their explanatory powers are discussed in the light of empirical data. Two well-known phenomena of illusory form are dealt with, the Ehrenstein illusion and the Kanizsa triangle. It is argued that the gap between the different levels of explanation, bottom—up versus top—down, creates scientific barriers which have all too often engendered unnecessary debate about who is right and who is wrong. In this review of the literature we favour an integrative approach to the question of how illusory form is derived from stimulus configurations which provide the visual system with seemingly incomplete information. The processes that can explain the emergence of these phenomena range from local feature detection to global strategies of perceptual organisation. These processes may be similar to those that help us restore partially occluded objects in everyday vision. To understand better the Ehrenstein and Kanizsa illusions, it is proposed that different levels of analysis and explanation are not mutually exclusive, but complementary. Theories of illusory contour and form perception must, therefore, take into account the underlying neurophysiological mechanisms and their possible interactions with cognitive and attentional processes.


2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 255-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hector Navarro Fructuoso ◽  
Manuel Martinez-Corral ◽  
Genaro Saavedra Tortosa ◽  
Amparo Pons Marti ◽  
Bahram Javidi

2004 ◽  
Vol 4 (8) ◽  
pp. 888-888
Author(s):  
Y. Su ◽  
T. Leng ◽  
Z. J. He

The human visual system sees an illusory contour where there is a fault line across a regular striped pattern. We demonstrate that bees respond as if they see the same illusory contour. There is also a type of neuron in the lobula of the dragonfly optic lobe which responds directionally to motion of the illusory contour as if to an edge or line. Apparently insects have a mechanism that sees illusory contours and therefore assists in the demarcation of edges and objects at places where local contrast falls to zero at an edge, or where one textured object partially obscures another. These results suggest that insect vision, although spatially crude and low in processing power, sees separate objects by similar mechanisms to our own.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document