Motion Extrapolation and Velocity Transposition

Perception ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 875-889 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander N Sokolov ◽  
Walter H Ehrenstein ◽  
Marina A Pavlova ◽  
C Richard Cavonius
Keyword(s):  
Visual System ◽  
Target Size ◽  
Moving Target ◽  
Motion Extrapolation ◽  
Slow Velocity

A study of the effect of the size of a moving target and the extent of its visible motion on motion extrapolation is reported. Targets (a horizontal pair of dots separated by either 0.2 or 0.8 deg) moved across a 10 deg rectilinear path and were then occluded. Observers pressed a key when they thought the leading dot of a hidden target had reached a randomly specified position (0–12 deg from the point of occlusion). In experiment 1, in agreement with velocity-transposition predictions, at moderate (5 deg s−1) and rapid (10 deg s−1) velocities extrapolation times were longer for large targets than for small ones. At slow velocity (2.5 deg s−1) this effect was reversed. In experiment 2 the effect of target size at moderate velocity was found for a short (2.5 deg) visible path. However, the extrapolation time increased with shorter (2.5 deg versus 10 deg) paths. A proposed account of these effects suggests that the visual system performs a spatiotemporal scaling, according to the velocity-transposition principle, not only of visible motion but also of extrapolated motion.

Neural limitations of visual excitability. IV: spatial determinants of retrochiasmal interaction

1962 ◽  
Vol 203 (2) ◽  
pp. 359-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
William S. Battersby ◽  
Irving H. Wagman
Keyword(s):  
Visual System ◽  
Spatial Interaction ◽  
The Other ◽  
Target Size ◽  
Test Flash ◽  
Receptor Field ◽  
System A ◽  
Msec Interval ◽  
Temporal Intervals ◽  
Trained Observers

Visual excitability changes were obtained from two trained observers by measuring threshold with a test flash of light at varying temporal intervals from a supraliminal conditioning flash. In monocular observation the two flashes were presented to the same eye; in binocular observation the conditioning flash was exposed to one eye and the test to the homonymous location in the other eye. The conditioning target size was varied while the concentrically placed test flash was held constant. In all instances, threshold rose when test preceded conditioning flash in time, reaching a maximum at about a o-msec interval. As test flash was progressively delayed with respect to conditioning flash onset, thresholds fell to an asymptote, returning to resting level only after termination of the conditioning flash. Both monocularly and binocularly, an increase in the magnitude of threshold rise was produced by making the conditioning target smaller, the greatest proportionate effect being obtained binocularly. These findings indicate that central (retrochiasmal) processes are critical with respect to spatial interaction in the visual system, a conclusion compatible with recent studies on the cortical receptor field.

Timing Accuracy in Motion Extrapolation: Reverse Effects of Target Size and Visible Extent of Motion at Low and High Speeds

Perception ◽  
10.1068/p3397 ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 699-706 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Sokolov ◽  
Marina Pavlova
Keyword(s):  
Absolute Error ◽  
Human Vision ◽  
Target Size ◽  
Motion Processing ◽  
Timing Accuracy ◽  
Low Speed ◽  
Motion Extrapolation ◽  
High Speeds ◽  
Processing Mechanisms ◽  
Scaling Algorithms

By varying target size, speed, and extent of visible motion we examined the timing accuracy in motion extrapolation. Small or large targets (0.2 or 0.8 deg) moved at either 2.5, 5, or 10 deg s−1 across a horizontal path (2.5 or 10 deg) and then vanished behind an occluder. Observers responded when they judged that the target had reached a randomly specified position between 0 and 12 deg. With higher speeds, the timing accuracy (the reverse of absolute error) was better for small than for large targets, and for long than for short visible extents. With low speed, these effects were reversed. In addition, while long visible extents yielded a greater accuracy at high than at low speeds, for short extents the accuracy was much better with the low speed. The findings suggest that, when extrapolating motion with targets and visible extents of different sizes, the visual system implements different scaling algorithms depending on target speed. At higher speeds, processing of visible and occluded motion is likely to share a common scaling mechanism based on velocity transposition. Reverse effects for target size and extent of visible motion at low and high speeds converge with the assumption of two distinct speed-tuned motion-processing mechanisms in human vision.

Some Recent Results in Quiescent Prominence Spectrometry

1979 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 41-47
Author(s):  
Donald A. Landman
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Computer System ◽  
Spectral Response ◽  
Absolute Intensity ◽  
Solar Observatory ◽  
Target Size ◽  
Small Target ◽  
Signal Averaging ◽  
Quiescent Prominence

This paper describes some recent results of our quiescent prominence spectrometry program at the Mees Solar Observatory on Haleakala. The observations were made with the 25 cm coronagraph/coudé spectrograph system using a silicon vidicon detector. This detector consists of 500 contiguous channels covering approximately 6 or 80 Å, depending on the grating used. The instrument is interfaced to the Observatory’s PDP 11/45 computer system, and has the important advantages of wide spectral response, linearity and signal-averaging with real-time display. Its principal drawback is the relatively small target size. For the present work, the aperture was about 3″ × 5″. Absolute intensity calibrations were made by measuring quiet regions near sun center.

Author response for "The brain of the African wild dog. IV . The visual system"

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samson Chengetanai ◽  
Adhil Bhagwandin ◽  
Mads F. Bertelsen ◽  
Therese Hård ◽  
Patrick R. Hof ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual System ◽  
Author Response ◽  
African Wild Dog ◽  
Wild Dog ◽  
The Brain

Digital differential hysteresis iimage processing displays what the microscope acquires but the eye can't see

1995 ◽  
Vol 53 ◽  
pp. 642-643
Author(s):  
Klaus-Ruediger Peters
Keyword(s):  
Image Processing ◽  
Visual System ◽  
High Precision ◽  
Image Data ◽  
Processing Technology ◽  
Output Data ◽  
Contrast Resolution ◽  
Pixel Intensity ◽  
Data Reading ◽  
Hysteresis Properties

Differential hysteresis processing is a new image processing technology that provides a tool for the display of image data information at any level of differential contrast resolution. This includes the maximum contrast resolution of the acquisition system which may be 1,000-times higher than that of the visual system (16 bit versus 6 bit). All microscopes acquire high precision contrasts at a level of <0.01-25% of the acquisition range in 16-bit - 8-bit data, but these contrasts are mostly invisible or only partially visible even in conventionally enhanced images. The processing principle of the differential hysteresis tool is based on hysteresis properties of intensity variations within an image.Differential hysteresis image processing moves a cursor of selected intensity range (hysteresis range) along lines through the image data reading each successive pixel intensity. The midpoint of the cursor provides the output data. If the intensity value of the following pixel falls outside of the actual cursor endpoint values, then the cursor follows the data either with its top or with its bottom, but if the pixels' intensity value falls within the cursor range, then the cursor maintains its intensity value.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document