Sensitivity to Shearing and Compressive Motion in Random Dots

Perception ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken Nakayama ◽  
Gerald H Silverman ◽  
Donald I A MacLeod ◽  
Jeffrey Mulligan
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Temporal Frequency ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Vertical Motion ◽  
Major Axis ◽  
Spatial Integration ◽  
Movement Amplitude ◽  
Differential Motion ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Sinusoidal Function

The sensitivity of the visual system to motion of differentially moving random dots was measured. Two kinds of one-dimensional motion were compared: standing-wave patterns where dot movement amplitude varied as a sinusoidal function of position along the axis of dot movement (longitudinal or compressional waves) and patterns of motion where dot movement amplitude varied as a sinusoidal function orthogonal to the axis of motion (transverse or shearing waves). Spatial frequency, temporal frequency, and orientation of the motion were varied. The major finding was a much larger threshold rise for shear than for compression when motion spatial frequency increased beyond 1 cycle deg−1. Control experiments ruled out the extraneous cues of local luminance or local dot density. No conspicuous low spatial-frequency rise in thresholds for any type of differential motion was seen at the lowest spatial frequencies tested, and no difference was seen between horizontal and vertical motion. The results suggest that at the motion threshold spatial integration is greatest in a direction orthogonal to the direction of motion, a view consistent with elongated receptive fields most sensitive to motion orthogonal to their major axis.

Responses to sinusoidal gratings of two types of very nonlinear retinal ganglion cells of cat

1989 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 213-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. B. Troy ◽  
G. Einstein ◽  
R. P. Schuurmans ◽  
J. G. Robson ◽  
Ch. Enroth-Cugell
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Cell Model ◽  
Second Harmonic ◽  
Temporal Frequency ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Luminance Contrast ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Low Pass

AbstractPerhaps 35% of all of the ganglion cells of the cat do not have classical center-surround organized receptive fields. This paper describes, quantitatively, the responses of two such cell types to stimulation with sinusoidal luminance gratings, whose spatial frequency, mean luminance, contrast, and temporal frequency were varied independently. The patterns were well-focused on the retina of the anesthetized and paralyzed cat. In one type of cell, the maintained discharge was depressed or completely suppressed when a contrast pattern was imaged onto the receptive field (suppressed-by-contrast cell). In the other type of cell, the introduction of a pattern elicited a burst of spikes (impressed-by-contrast cell).When stimulated with drifting gratings, the cell's mean rate of discharge was reduced (suppressed-by-contrast cell) or elevated (impressed-by-contrast cell) over a limited band of spatial frequencies. There was no significant modulated component of response. The reduction in mean rate of suppressed-by-contrast cells caused by drifting gratings had a monotonic dependence on contrast, a relatively low-pass temporal-frequency characteristic and was greater under photopic than mesopic illuminance. If gratings of spatial frequency, that when drifted evoked a response from these cells, were instead held stationary and contrast-reversed, the mean rate of a suppressed-by-contrast cell was also reduced and that of an impressed-by-contrast cell increased. But, for contrast-reversed gratings, the discharge contained substantial modulation at even harmonic frequencies, the largest being the second harmonic. The amplitude of this second harmonic did not depend on the spatial phase of the grating, and its dependence on spatial frequency, at least for suppressed-by-contrast cells, was similar to that of the reduction in mean rate of discharge. Our results suggest that the receptive fields of suppressed-by-contrast and impressed-by-contrast cells can be modeled with the general form of the nonlinear subunit components of Hochstein and Shapley's (1976) Y cell model.

Spatial-Frequency Characteristics of Different Areas of Human Cortex

Perception ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 26 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 167-167
Author(s):  
A K Harauzov ◽  
Y E Shelepin ◽  
S V Pronin
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Temporal Frequency ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Occipital Lobe ◽  
Occipital Cortex ◽  
Normal Subjects ◽  
Sine Wave ◽  
Electrode System ◽  
Frequency Characteristics ◽  
Spatial Frequencies

We recorded visual evoked potentials in normal subjects from different areas of the occipital cortex, from the temporal and parietal lobes according to the ‘ten - twenty’ electrode system. Stimuli were black-and-white sine-wave gratings with eight different spatial frequencies in the range 0.45 to 14.4 cycles deg−1, presented at four different temporal frequencies (1, 2, 4, 8 Hz). Stimulation was either contrast-reversal or onset. VEPs were analysed both by component analysis and by Fourier transformation. Spatial characteristics were measured from the dependence of the amplitudes and latencies of the main response components (N1, P1, N2, P2) on the contrast and spatial frequency of the gratings. The characteristics obtained in the occipital lobe are in accordance with earlier experimental data [Regan, 1989 Human Electrophysiology (Amsterdam: Elsevier)]. When the temporal frequency of stimulation was increased, the maximum of the spatial-frequency curves shifted to lower spatial frequencies. However, we found differences in the spatial-frequency characteristics of different cortical areas. The results are discussed in terms of differences in the spatial and temporal tuning of the receptive fields of neurons in these areas.

Temporal and Spatial Frequency Tuning of the Flicker Motion Aftereffect

Perception ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 25 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12-12
Author(s):  
P J Bex ◽  
F A J Verstraten ◽  
I Mareschal
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Frequency Tuning ◽  
Temporal Frequency ◽  
Motion Aftereffect ◽  
Sine Wave ◽  
Test Grating ◽  
Spatial Frequency Tuning ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Low Pass ◽  
Sine Wave Gratings

The motion aftereffect (MAE) was used to study the temporal-frequency and spatial-frequency selectivity of the visual system at suprathreshold contrasts. Observers adapted to drifting sine-wave gratings of a range of spatial and temporal frequencies. The magnitude of the MAE induced by the adaptation was measured with counterphasing test gratings of a variety of spatial and temporal frequencies. Independently of the spatial or temporal frequency of the adapting grating, the largest MAE was found with slowly counterphasing test gratings (∼0.125 – 0.25 Hz). For slowly counterphasing test gratings (<∼2 Hz), the largest MAEs were found when the test grating was of similar spatial frequency to that of the adapting grating, even at very low spatial frequencies (0.125 cycle deg−1). However, such narrow spatial frequency tuning was lost when the temporal frequency of the test grating was increased. The data suggest that MAEs are dominated by a single, low-pass temporal-frequency mechanism and by a series of band-pass spatial-frequency mechanisms at low temporal frequencies. At higher test temporal frequencies, the loss of spatial-frequency tuning implicates separate mechanisms with broader spatial frequency tuning.

Spatial Integration of Objectively Equiluminous Chromatic Gratings

Perception ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 26 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 200-200
Author(s):  
M I Kankaanpää ◽  
J Rovamo ◽  
H T Kukkonen ◽  
J Hallikainen
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Contrast Sensitivity ◽  
Spatial Integration ◽  
Chromatic Contrast ◽  
Shape Difference ◽  
Sensitivity Functions ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Low Pass ◽  
Chromatic Aberrations ◽  
Chromatic Contrast Sensitivity

Contrast sensitivity functions for achromatic and chromatic gratings tend to be band-pass and low-pass in shape, respectively. Our aim was to test whether spatial integration contributes to the shape difference found at low spatial frequencies. We measured binocular chromatic contrast sensitivity as a function of grating area for objectively equiluminous red - green and blue - yellow chromatic gratings. Chromatic contrast refers to the Michelson contrast of either of the two chromatic component gratings presented in counterphase against the combined background. Grating area ( A) varied from 1 to 256 square cycles ( Af2) at spatial frequencies ( f) of 0.125 – 4.0 cycles deg−1. We used only horizontal gratings at low and medium spatial frequencies to minimise the transverse and longitudinal chromatic aberrations due to ocular optics. At all spatial frequencies studied, chromatic contrast sensitivity increased with grating area. Ac was found to be constant at low spatial frequencies (0.125 – 0.5 cycles deg−1) but decreased in inverse proportion to increasing spatial frequency at 1 – 4 cycles deg−1. Thus, spatial integration depends similarly on spatial frequency for achromatic (Luntinen et al, 1995 Vision Research35 2339 – 2346) and chromatic gratings, and differences in spatial integration do not contribute to the shape difference of the respective contrast sensitivity functions.

Dark Adaptation as a Model of the Parkinsonian Visual System

Perception ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 26 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 48-48
Author(s):  
B Wink ◽  
J P Harris
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Visual System ◽  
Dark Adaptation ◽  
Peripheral Vision ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
High Spatial Frequency ◽  
Normal Subjects ◽  
Apparent Contrast ◽  
Contrast Gain ◽  
Spatial Frequencies

It has been suggested that the Parkinsonian visual system is like the normal visual system, but is inappropriately dark-adapted (Beaumont et al, 1987 Clinical Vision Sciences2 123 – 129). Thus it is of interest to ask to what extent dark adaptation of normal subjects produces visual changes like those of Parkinson's disease (PD). One such change is the reduction in apparent contrast of medium and high spatial frequencies in peripheral vision in the illness (Harris et al, 1992 Brain115 1447 – 1457). Normal subjects judged whether the contrast of a peripherally viewed grating was higher or lower than that of a foveally viewed grating, and a staircase technique was used to estimate the point of subjective equality. Judgements were made at four spatial frequencies (0.5 to 4.0 cycles deg−1) and four contrasts (8.0% to 64%). The display, the mean luminance of which was 26 cd m−2, was viewed through a 1.5 lu nd filter in the relatively dark-adapted condition. The ANOVA showed an interaction between dark adaptation and the spatial frequency of the gratings. Dark adaptation reduces the apparent contrast of high-spatial-frequency gratings, an effect which is greater at lower contrasts. This mimics the effect found with PD sufferers, and suggests that dark adaptation may provide a useful model of the PD visual system. In a second experiment, the effect of dark adaptation on the relationship between apparent spatial frequency in the fovea and periphery was investigated. The experiment was similar to the first, except that judgements were made about the apparent spatial frequency, rather than the contrast, of the peripheral grating. ANOVA showed no differential effect of dark adaptation on the apparent spatial frequency of the peripheral grating. This suggests that the observed reduction in apparent contrast of the peripheral gratings in dark-adapted normals and Parkinson's sufferers may reflect relative changes in contrast gain, rather than relative changes in the spatial organisation of receptive fields.

Inhibition and Excitation in the Locust DCMD Receptive Field: Spatial Frequency, Temporal and Spatial Characteristics

1979 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 191-216
Author(s):  
ROBERT B. PINTER
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Visual Angle ◽  
Temporal Frequency ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Movement Detector ◽  
Small Target ◽  
Grating Pattern ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Pattern Size

1. The descending contralateral movement detector (DCMD) of the locust responds vigorously to small target (ca. 5°) stimuli; this response is inhibited by simultaneous or subsequent rotation of a radial grating (windmill) pattern (subtending 19-90° of visual angle) and suppressed by earlier rotation. 2. The excitation produced in the DCMD by rotation of a radial grating pattern depends only on the spatial frequency of the stripes of the pattern, and is independent of pattern size, and of temporal frequency over the range of low values used. 3. The inhibition produced by this same stimulus similarly depends only on the spatial frequency of the stripes of the pattern, independent of pattern size, and of temporal frequency over the range of low values used. 4. As the radial grating excitation decreases with increasing spatial frequency, the inhibition increases until limited by optical and neural resolution. 5. For spatial frequencies of the radial grating pattern below 0.05 cyc/deg the radial grating patterns become excitatory. Above 0.05 cyc/deg they are inhibitory. This is the point in spatial frequency below which inhibitory grating ‘backgrounds’ become excitatory targets. 6. Inhibition decreases as the size of the radial grating pattern is decreased below 190 visual angle; at 8° or less no inhibition can be found at any spatial frequency. 7. Inhibition is greater in the posterior than anterior regions of the receptive field, and greater in the ventral than the dorsal regions. 8. Inhibition decreases as the distance between small target and the radial grating is increased, but this is influenced by the local variations of excitation and inhibition. 9. Habituation is often greater for small target and low-frequency radial grating response than for inhibited small target and high frequency grating response. 10. These results substantiate previously proposed lateral inhibition models of the acridid movement detector system.

Monocular and binocular response properties of cells in the striate-recipient zone of the cat's lateral posterior-pulvinar complex

1989 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 544-557 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Casanova ◽  
R. D. Freeman ◽  
J. P. Nordmann
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Frequency Tuning ◽  
Single Cells ◽  
Temporal Frequency ◽  
Orientation Tuning ◽  
Low Frequencies ◽  
Response Properties ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Lateral Posterior ◽  
The Mean

1. We have studied response properties of single cells in the striate-recipient zone of the cat's lateral posterior-pulvinar (LP-P) complex. This zone is in the lateral section of the lateral posterior nucleus (LP1). Our purpose was to determine basic response characteristics of these cells and to investigate the possibility that the LP-P complex is a center of integration that is dominated by input from visual cortex. 2. The majority (72%) of cells in the striate-recipient zone respond to drifting sinusoidal gratings with unmodulated discharge. 3. Cells in the LP1 are selective to the orientation of gratings, and tuning functions have a mean bandwidth of 31 degrees. More than one-half of these units are direction-selective. The preferred orientation and the tuning widths for the two eyes are generally well matched. However, a few cells exhibited the interesting property of opposite preferred directions for the two eyes. Orientation tuning for a small group of cells was different for the mean discharge and first harmonic components, suggesting a convergence from different inputs to these cells. 4. Two-thirds of LP1 cells are tuned to low spatial frequencies (less than 0.5 c/deg). The tuning is broad with a mean bandwidth of 2.2 octaves. The remaining one-third of the units are low-pass because they show no attenuation of their responses to low spatial frequencies. Both eyes exhibit the same spatial frequency preference and the same spatial frequency tuning. There is a high correlation between spatial frequency and orientation selectivities. 5. All cells tested are tuned for temporal frequency with a sharp attenuation for low frequencies. The optimal values range between 4 and 8 Hz, and the mean bandwidth is 2.2 octaves. 6. Cells in LP1 are mostly binocular. When monocular, cells are almost always contralaterally driven. Dichoptic presentation of gratings reveals the presence of strong binocular interaction. In almost all cases, these interactions are phase specific. The cell's discharge is facilitated at particular phases and inhibited at phases 180 degrees away. These binocular interactions are orientation dependent. 7. Twenty-five percent of the cells with phase-specific binocular facilitation appear to be monocular when each eye is tested separately. For three cells, we observed a non-phase-specific inhibitory effect of the silent eye. 8. Our findings indicate that LP1 cells form a relatively homogeneous group, suggesting a high degree of integration of multiple cortical inputs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Pretectal Neurons Optimized for the Detection of Saccade-Like Movements of the Visual Image

2001 ◽  
Vol 85 (4) ◽  
pp. 1512-1521 ◽  
Author(s):  
N.S.C. Price ◽  
M. R. Ibbotson
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Second Harmonic ◽  
Temporal Frequency ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
High Spatial Frequency ◽  
Sine Wave ◽  
Wide Field ◽  
Visual Response ◽  
High Contrast ◽  
Sine Wave Gratings

The visual response properties of nondirectional wide-field sensitive neurons in the wallaby pretectum are described. These neurons are called scintillation detectors (SD-neurons) because they respond vigorously to rapid, high contrast visual changes in any part of their receptive fields. SD-neurons are most densely located within a 1- to 2-mm radius from the nucleus of the optic tract, interspersed with direction-selective retinal slip cells. Receptive fields are monocular and cover large areas of the contralateral visual field (30–120°). Response sizes are equal for motion in all directions, and spontaneous activities are similar for all orientations of static sine-wave gratings. Response magnitude increases near linearly with increasing stimulus diameter and contrast. The mean response latency for wide-field, high-contrast motion stimulation was 43.4 ± 9.4 ms (mean ± SD, n = 28). The optimum visual stimuli for SD-neurons are wide-field, low spatial frequency (<0.2 cpd) scenes moving at high velocities (75–500°/s). These properties match the visual input during saccades, indicating optimal sensitivity to rapid eye movements. Cells respond to brightness increments and decrements, suggesting inputs from on and off channels. Stimulation with high-speed, low spatial frequency gratings produces oscillatory responses at the input temporal frequency. Conversely, high spatial frequency gratings give oscillations predominantly at the second harmonic of the temporal frequency. Contrast reversing sine-wave gratings elicit transient, phase-independent responses. These responses match the properties of Y retinal ganglion cells, suggesting that they provide inputs to SD-neurons. We discuss the possible role of SD-neurons in suppressing ocular following during saccades and in the blink or saccade-locked modulation of lateral geniculate nucleus activity to control retino-cortical information flow.

Differential Motion Thresholds to Sinusoidal Gratings at Two Eccentricities

1991 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 765-766
Author(s):  
Mark C. Chorlton ◽  
David C. Finlay ◽  
Marx L. Manning ◽  
W. Ross Fulham ◽  
John Boulton
Keyword(s):  
Frequency Tuning ◽  
Temporal Frequency ◽  
Differential Motion ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Sinusoidal Gratings ◽  
Minimum Velocity

Differential motion thresholds were measured at eccentricities of 9° and 16.6° using computer-generated sinusoidal gratings. Three spatial frequencies (0.51, 0.25, and 0.13 cycles/deg) were examined at reference velocities of 2, 4, 8, 16, 52, and 48 deg/sec. Minimum differential velocity thresholds were between 20 and 30% of the reference velocities for the three spatial frequencies at both eccentricities Increasing eccentricity produced an increase in the velocity at which minimum velocity discrimination occurred. Temporal frequency tuning was between 4 and 8 Hz, regardless of eccentricity.

Effect of repetitive visual stimuli on behaviour and plasma corticosterone of European starlings

2005 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 245-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Temporal Frequency ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
High Spatial Frequency ◽  
Plasma Corticosterone ◽  
European Starlings ◽  
Fluorescent Lamps ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Temporal And Spatial

AbstractFlickering light can cause adverse effects in some humans, as can rhythmic spatial patterns of particular frequencies. We investigated whether birds react to the temporal frequency of standard 100 Hz fluorescent lamps and the spatial frequency of the visual surround in the manner predicted by the human literature, by examining their effects on the preferences, behaviour and plasma corticosterone of European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). We predicted that high frequency lighting (> 30 kHz) and a relatively low spatial frequency on the walls of their cages (0.1 cycle cm−1) would be less aversive than low frequency lighting (100 Hz) and a relatively high spatial frequency (2.5 cycle cm−1). Birds had strong preferences for both temporal and spatial frequencies. These preferences did not always fit with predictions, although there was evidence that 100 Hz was more stressful than 30 kHz lighting, as birds were less active and basal corticosterone levels were higher under 100 Hz lighting. Our chosen spatial frequencies had no overall significant effect on corticosterone levels. Although there are clearly effects of, and interactions between, the frequency of the light and the visual surround on the behaviour and physiology of birds, the pattern of results is not straightforward.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document