Right-Hemisphere Superiority in the Discrimination of Spatial Phase

Perception ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 695-708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana Fiorentini ◽  
Nicoletta Berardi
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Right Hemisphere ◽  
Frequency Discrimination ◽  
High Contrast ◽  
Spatial Phase ◽  
Phase Discrimination ◽  
Visual Hemifield ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Sinusoidal Gratings ◽  
The Right

Visual field differences have been investigated in various detection and discrimination tasks for simple sinusoidal gratings or for complex gratings composed of two sinusoids of spatial frequencies f and 3 f. Sinusoidal gratings were employed to evaluate contrast sensitivity, subthreshold summation effects, aftereffects of adaptation to a high-contrast grating, and spatial-frequency discrimination. The tasks with complex gratings were detection of the 3 f component in the presence of a high-contrast f component and spatial-phase discrimination. The stimuli were presented either in the left or in the right visual hemifield. The results indicate a lack of lateralization for detection and spatial-frequency discrimination of sinusoidal gratings, and for the bandwidth of subthreshold summation effects and adaptation aftereffects, whereas the detection of the 3 f component in the presence of a high-contrast f component, as well as spatial-phase discrimination of f + 3 f gratings, show a left-field advantage. This suggests a right-hemisphere superiority in the processing of spatial phase.

Right-Hemisphere Specialization for Contour Grouping

2014 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. 331-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregor Volberg
Keyword(s):  
Right Hemisphere ◽  
Contour Detection ◽  
Global Processing ◽  
Detection Accuracy ◽  
Frequency Spectra ◽  
Visual Hemifield ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
A Chain ◽  
The Right ◽  
Hemisphere Specialization

Previous studies often revealed a right-hemisphere specialization for processing the global level of compound visual stimuli. Here we explore whether a similar specialization exists for the detection of intersected contours defined by a chain of local elements. Subjects were presented with arrays of randomly oriented Gabor patches that could contain a global path of collinearly arranged elements in the left or in the right visual hemifield. As expected, the detection accuracy was higher for contours presented to the left visual field/right hemisphere. This difference was absent in two control conditions where the smoothness of the contour was decreased. The results demonstrate that the contour detection, often considered to be driven by lateral coactivation in primary visual cortex, relies on higher-level visual representations that differ between the hemispheres. Furthermore, because contour and non-contour stimuli had the same spatial frequency spectra, the results challenge the view that the right-hemisphere advantage in global processing depends on a specialization for processing low spatial frequencies.

The Effect of Spatial Frequency and Contrast on Visual Persistence

Perception ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 529-539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison Bowling ◽  
William Lovegrove ◽  
Barry Mapperson
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Visual Persistence ◽  
Published Data ◽  
High Contrast ◽  
Low Contrast ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Sinusoidal Gratings

The visual persistence of sinusoidal gratings of varying spatial frequency and contrast was measured. It was found that the persistence of low-contrast gratings was longer than that of high-contrast stimuli for all spatial frequencies investigated. At higher contrast levels of 1 and 4 cycles deg−1 gratings, a tendency for persistence to be independent of contrast was observed. For 12 cycles deg−1 gratings, however, persistence continued to decrease with increasing contrast. These results are compared with recently published data on other temporal responses, and are discussed in terms of the different properties of sustained and transient channels.

Hemispheric Processing of Categorical and Coordinate Spatial Relations in the Absence of Low Spatial Frequencies

2002 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 291-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matia Okubo ◽  
Chikashi Michimata
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Right Hemisphere ◽  
Spatial Relation ◽  
Spatial Relations ◽  
Right Visual Field ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Categorical Task ◽  
The Right ◽  
Coordinate Spatial Relations

Right-handed participants performed the categorical and coordinate spatial relation judgments on stimuli presented to either the left visual field—right hemisphere (LVF-RH) or the right visual field—left hemisphere (RVF-LH). The stimulus patterns were formulated either by bright dots or by contrast-balanced dots. When the stimuli were bright, an RVF-LH advantage was observed for the categorical task, whereas an LVF-RH advantage was observed for the coordinate task. When the stimuli were contrast balanced, the RVF-LH advantage was observed for the categorical task, but the LVF-RH advantage was eliminated for the coordinate task. Because the contrast-balanced dots are largely devoid of low spatial frequency content, these results suggest that processing of low spatial frequency is responsible for the right hemisphere advantage for the coordinate spatial processing.

Spatial-Frequency Discrimination, Brain Lateralisation, and Acute Intake of Alcohol

Perception ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 729-736 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reidulf G Watten ◽  
Svein Magnussen ◽  
Mark W Greenlee
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Visual Information ◽  
Right Hemisphere ◽  
Frequency Discrimination ◽  
Right Visual Field ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Balanced Placebo Design ◽  
Acute Intake

The effect of alcohol (breath-alcohol level of 0.1%) on perceptual discrimination of low (1.5 cycles deg−1) and high (8 cycles deg−1) spatial frequencies in the left and right visual field was measured in eighteen right-handed males, in a double-blind, balanced placebo design. Discrimination thresholds for briefly (180 ms) presented sinusoidal gratings were determined by two-alternative forced-choice judgments with four interleaving psychophysical staircases providing random trial-to-trial variation of reference spatial frequency and visual field, in addition to a random (±10%) jitter of reference spatial frequency. Alcohol produced overall higher discrimination thresholds but did not alter the visual-field balance: no main effect of visual field was observed, but in both placebo and alcohol conditions spatial frequency interacted with visual field in the direction predicted by the spatial-frequency hypothesis of hemispheric asymmetry in visual-information processing, with left-visual-field/right-hemisphere superiority in discrimination of low spatial frequencies and right-visual-field/left-hemisphere superiority in discrimination of high spatial frequencies.

scholarly journals Persistent Hemispheric Differences in the Perceptual Selection of Spatial Frequencies

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (9) ◽  
pp. 2021-2027 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elise A. Piazza ◽  
Michael A. Silver
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Left Hemisphere ◽  
Hemispheric Asymmetry ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Right Hemisphere ◽  
High Spatial Frequency ◽  
Hemispheric Differences ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
The Right ◽  
Perceptual Selection

Previous research has shown that the right hemisphere processes low spatial frequencies more efficiently than the left hemisphere, which preferentially processes high spatial frequencies. These studies have typically measured RTs to single, briefly flashed gratings and/or have directed observers to attend to a particular spatial frequency immediately before making a judgment about a subsequently presented stimulus. Thus, it is unclear whether the hemispheres differ in perceptual selection from multiple spatial frequencies that are simultaneously present in the environment, without bias from selective attention. Moreover, the time course of hemispheric asymmetry in spatial frequency processing is unknown. We addressed both of these questions with binocular rivalry, a measure of perceptual selection from competing alternatives over time. Participants viewed a pair of rivalrous orthogonal gratings with different spatial frequencies, presented either to the left or right of central fixation, and continuously reported which grating they perceived. At the beginning of a trial, the low spatial frequency grating was perceptually selected more often when presented in the left hemifield (right hemisphere) than in the right hemifield (left hemisphere), whereas the high spatial frequency grating showed the opposite pattern of results. This hemispheric asymmetry in perceptual selection persisted for the entire 30-sec stimulus presentation, continuing long after stimulus onset. These results indicate stable differences in the resolution of ambiguity across spatial locations and demonstrate the importance of considering sustained differences in perceptual selection across space when characterizing conscious representations of complex scenes.

scholarly journals Lateralization in monogamous pairs: wild geese prefer to keep their partner in the left hemifield except when disturbed

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elmira Zaynagutdinova ◽  
Karina Karenina ◽  
Andrey Giljov
Keyword(s):  
Social Interactions ◽  
Right Hemisphere ◽  
Natural Setting ◽  
Intraspecific Interactions ◽  
Brain Hemispheres ◽  
Emergency Situations ◽  
Anser Albifrons ◽  
Significant Bias ◽  
Visual Hemifield ◽  
The Right

Abstract Behavioural lateralization, which reflects the functional specializations of the two brain hemispheres, is assumed to play an important role in cooperative intraspecific interactions. However, there are few studies focused on the lateralization in cooperative behaviours of individuals, especially in a natural setting. In the present study, we investigated lateralized spatial interactions between the partners in life-long monogamous pairs. The male-female pairs of two geese species (barnacle, Branta leucopsis, and white-fronted, Anser albifrons geese), were observed during different stages of the annual cycle in a variety of conditions. In geese flocks, we recorded which visual hemifield (left/right) the following partner used to monitor the leading partner relevant to the type of behaviour and the disturbance factors. In a significant majority of pairs, the following bird viewed the leading partner with the left eye during routine behaviours such as resting and feeding in undisturbed conditions. This behavioural lateralization, implicating the right hemisphere processing, was consistent across the different aggregation sites and years of the study. In contrast, no significant bias was found in a variety of geese behaviours associated with enhanced disturbance (when alert on water, flying or fleeing away when disturbed, feeding during the hunting period, in urban area feeding and during moulting). We hypothesize that the increased demands for right hemisphere processing to deal with stressful and emergency situations may interfere with the manifestation of lateralization in social interactions.

Orientation Specificity and Spatial Selectivity in Human Vision

Perception ◽  
1973 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
J A Movshon ◽  
C Blakemore
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Human Visual System ◽  
Human Vision ◽  
Orientation Tuning ◽  
High Contrast ◽  
Vertical Grating ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
High Contrast Grating ◽  
Orientation Specificity ◽  
Adaptation Method

An adaptation method is used to determine the orientation specificity of channels sensitive to different spatial frequencies in the human visual system. Comparison between different frequencies is made possible by a data transformation in which orientational effects are expressed in terms of equivalent contrast (the contrast of a vertical grating producing the same adaptational effect as a high-contrast grating of a given orientation). It is shown that, despite great variances in the range of orientations affected by adaptation at different spatial frequencies (±10° to ±50°), the half-width at half-amplitude of the orientation channels does not vary systematically as a function of spatial frequency over the range tested (2·5 to 20 cycles deg−1). Two subjects were used and they showed significantly different orientation tuning across the range of spatial frequencies. The results are discussed with reference to previous determinations of orientation specificity, and to related psychophysical and neurophysiological phenomena.

Velocity Threshold for Relative and Uniform Motion

Perception ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 26 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 353-353
Author(s):  
S Shioiri ◽  
S Ito ◽  
H Yaguchi
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Relative Motion ◽  
Threshold Function ◽  
Uniform Motion ◽  
Measured Velocity ◽  
Velocity Threshold ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Motion Condition ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Right

We measured velocity thresholds for relative and uniform motion as functions of spatial frequency and contrast. Stimuli were two horizontal bands on top of each other, both filled with vertical sinusoidal gratings. The gratings drifted either to the right or to the left, in opposite directions in the relative-motion condition but in the same direction in the uniform-motion condition. Observers had to report the direction of motion, and the velocity was varied until a velocity threshold was obtained. The results showed that the shapes of the threshold function plotted against spatial frequency are quite different for uniform and relative motion. The threshold for relative motion had a minimum at around 5 cycles deg−1, whereas the threshold for uniform motion had no such minimum, at least at higher contrasts (10% or higher). The difference was unclear for lower-contrast stimuli, however. The threshold profile as a function of contrast was also different between relative and uniform motion. Although the threshold decreased with increasing contrast in both cases, this dependence saturated at around 10% contrast for uniform motion, while it continued up to the highest contrast (85%) for relative motion. This difference held for all the spatial frequencies examined (from 0.75 to 12.1 cycles deg−1). The results suggest that the detection mechanisms for relative motion and uniform motion are different.

Monkeys Show an Oblique Effect

Perception ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 247-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph A Bauer ◽  
Donald A Owens ◽  
Joseph Thomas ◽  
Richard Held
Keyword(s):  
Animal Model ◽  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Oblique Effect ◽  
High Contrast ◽  
Square Wave ◽  
Spatial Frequencies

Monkeys aligned a cursor bar with high-contrast square-wave gratings presented in a variety of orientations. Alignment time increased with increasing spatial frequency from 6 to 24 cycles deg−1 regardless of the orientation of the grating. At higher spatial frequencies, alignment tasks took longer for obliquely oriented gratings than for horizontal and vertical ones. Reducing grating contrast by blurring the image of the 24 cycle deg−1 grating also produced longer alignment times for the obliques. These data indicate that monkeys have an oblique effect similar to that found in humans, implying that the monkey is a useful animal model for investigating the development of meridional anisotropies.

Contrast adaptation in retinal and cortical evoked potentials: No adaptation to low spatial frequencies

2002 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 645-650 ◽  
Author(s):  
THOMAS STEPHAN HEINRICH ◽  
MICHAEL BACH
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Visual Evoked Potential ◽  
Evoked Potential ◽  
Opposite Effect ◽  
Pattern Electroretinogram ◽  
Low Contrast ◽  
Contrast Adaptation ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Sinusoidal Gratings ◽  
Cross Adaptation

Contrast adaptation occurs in both the retina and the cortex. Defining its spatial dependence is crucial for understanding its potential roles. We thus asked to what degree contrast adaptation depends on spatial frequency, including cross-adaptation. Measuring the pattern electroretinogram (PERG) and the visual evoked potential (VEP) allowed separating retinal and cortical contributions. In ten subjects we recorded simultaneous PERGs and VEPs. Test stimuli were sinusoidal gratings of 98% contrast with spatial frequencies of 0.5 or 5.0 cpd, phase reversing at 17 reversals/s. Adaptation was controlled by prolonged presentation of these test stimuli or homogenous gray fields of the same luminance. When adaptation and test frequency were identical, we observed significant contrast adaptation only at 5 cpd: an amplitude reduction in the PERG (−22%) and VEP (−58%), and an effective reduction of latency in the PERG (−0.95 ms). When adapting at 5 cpd and testing at 0.5 cpd, the opposite effect was observed: enhancement of VEP amplitude by +26% and increase in effective PERG latency by +1.35 ms. When adapting at 0.5 cpd and testing at 5 cpd, there was no significant amplitude change in PERG and VEP, but a small effective PERG latency increase of +0.65 ms. The 0.5-cpd channel was not adapted by spatial frequencies of 0.5 cpd. The adaptability of the 5-cpd channel may mediate improved detail recognition after prolonged blur. The existence of both adaptable and nonadaptable mechanisms in the retina allows for the possibility that by comparing the adaptational state of spatial-frequency channels the retina can discern between overall low contrast and defocus in emmetropization control.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document