Two Dimensionality of the Correspondence Process in Apparent Motion

Perception ◽  
1978 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 683-693 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shimon Ullman
Keyword(s):  
Motion Perception ◽  
Apparent Motion ◽  
Spatial Separation ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Fundamental Process

A fundamental process underlying motion perception is the matching of corresponding elements in different views. In this correspondence process spatial separation between elements plays a major role. The relevant separation is shown by the current study to be the two-dimensional, uninterpreted distance, a finding that has an implication to the level at which the correspondence process is carried out. The current findings are compared with earlier results concerning ‘optimality’ of apparent motion to conclude that optimality cannot serve as a measure for the correspondence strength.

The Effect of Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Distance on Apparent Motion

Perception ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 305-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen Mutch ◽  
Isabel M Smith ◽  
Albert Yonas
Keyword(s):  
Motion Perception ◽  
Apparent Motion ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Spatial Separation ◽  
Three Dimensions ◽  
Correspondence Problem ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Motion Display ◽  
Specific Concern ◽  
Actual Depth

The problem of how the visual system matches corresponding inputs from one instant to the next to produce the perception of motion has been experimentally examined. The specific concern was whether this correspondence problem is solved prior to the interpretation of three-dimensional distance. Observers judged the degree of apparent motion between pairs of lights in a conflicting motion display. Spatial separation of the lights was varied in two and three dimensions in order to assess whether retinal distance, actual depth, or some combination of these provided critical information for correspondence. The results support Ullman's contention that only two-dimensional (retinal) distances are used in establishing correspondence in motion perception.

The Tactile Quartet: Comparing Ambiguous Apparent Motion in Tactile and Visual Stimuli

Perception ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harry H. Haladjian ◽  
Stuart Anstis ◽  
Mark Wexler ◽  
Patrick Cavanagh
Keyword(s):  
Motion Perception ◽  
Apparent Motion ◽  
Index Finger ◽  
Dimensional Space ◽  
Visual Stimuli ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Different Depths ◽  
Three Dimensional Space

In the visual quartet, alternating diagonal pairs of dots produce apparent motion horizontally or vertically, depending on proximity. Here, we studied a tactile quartet where vibrating tactors were attached to the thumbs and index fingers of both hands. Apparent motion was felt either within hands (from index finger to thumb) or between hands. Participants adjusted the distance between their hands to find the point where motion changed directions. Surprisingly, switchovers occurred when between-hand distances were as much as twice that of within-hand distances—a general bias that was also found for tactile judgments of static distances. This expansion of within-hand felt distances was again seen when lights were placed on the hands rather than vibrating tactors. Importantly, switchover points were similar when the hands were placed at different depths, indicating that representations governing tactile motion were in perceptual three-dimensional space, not retinal two-dimensional space. This was true whether the quartets were visual stimuli on the hands or were purely visual on a monitor, suggesting that proximity is generally determined in three-dimensional coordinates for motion perception. Finally, the similarity of visual and tactile results suggests a common computation for apparent motion, albeit with different built-in distance biases for separate modalities.

Neurobiological correlates of apparent motion perception in the human visual system using magnetoencephalography

NeuroImage ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 893
Author(s):  
C.I. Horenstein ◽  
R.R. Ramirez ◽  
E. Kronberg ◽  
U. Ribary ◽  
R.R. Llinas
Keyword(s):  
Visual System ◽  
Motion Perception ◽  
Apparent Motion ◽  
Human Visual System

4. Motion perception

2017 ◽  
pp. 50-58
Author(s):  
Brian Rogers
Keyword(s):  
Motion Perception ◽  
Apparent Motion ◽  
Time To Contact ◽  
Motion System ◽  
Visual Systems ◽  
Temporal Process ◽  
The World ◽  
Induced Motion ◽  
After Effect ◽  
Spatio Temporal

The ability to detect motion is one of the most important properties of our visual system and the visual systems of nearly every other species. Motion perception is not just important for detecting the movement of objects—both for catching prey and for avoiding predators—but it is also important for providing information about the 3-D structure of the world, for maintaining balance, determining our direction of heading, segregating the scene and breaking camouflage, and judging time-to-contact with other objects in the world. ‘Motion perception’ describes the spatio-temporal process of motion perception and the perceptual effects that tell us something about the characteristics of the motion system: apparent motion, the motion after-effect, and induced motion.

scholarly journals Comparison of the Spatial Limits on Direction Selectivity in Visual Areas MT and V1

2005 ◽  
Vol 93 (3) ◽  
pp. 1235-1245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark M. Churchland ◽  
Nicholas J. Priebe ◽  
Stephen G. Lisberger
Keyword(s):  
Apparent Motion ◽  
Great Majority ◽  
Spatial Separation ◽  
Direction Selectivity ◽  
Temporal Separation ◽  
Temporal Area ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
V1 Neurons ◽  
Preferred Direction ◽  
The Difference

We recorded responses to apparent motion from directionally selective neurons in primary visual cortex (V1) of anesthetized monkeys and middle temporal area (MT) of awake monkeys. Apparent motion consisted of multiple stationary stimulus flashes presented in sequence, characterized by their temporal separation (Δ t) and spatial separation (Δ x). Stimuli were 8° square patterns of 100% correlated random dots that moved at apparent speeds of 16 or 32°/s. For both V1 and MT, the difference between the response to the preferred and null directions declined with increasing flash separation. For each neuron, we estimated the maximum flash separation for which directionally selective responses were observed. For the range of speeds we used, Δ x provided a better description of the limitation on directional responses than did Δ t. When comparing MT and V1 neurons of similar preferred speed, there was no difference in the maximum Δ x between our samples from the two areas. In both V1 and MT, the great majority of neurons had maximal values of Δ x in the 0.25–1° range. Mean values were almost identical between the two areas. For most neurons, larger flash separations led to both weaker responses to the preferred direction and increased responses to the opposite direction. The former mechanism was slightly more dominant in MT and the latter slightly more dominant in V1. We conclude that V1 and MT neurons lose direction selectivity for similar values of Δ x, supporting the hypothesis that basic direction selectivity in MT is inherited from V1, at least over the range of stimulus speeds represented by both areas.

Perceptual Organization in Multistable Apparent Motion

Perception ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vilayanur S Ramachandran ◽  
Stuart M Anstis
Keyword(s):  
Motion Perception ◽  
Apparent Motion ◽  
Perceptual Organization ◽  
Necker Cube ◽  
The Other ◽  
Horizontal Oscillation ◽  
Random Location ◽  
Single Figure ◽  
Looking Back

Is motion perception based on a local piecemeal analysis of the image or do ‘global’ effects also play an important role? Use was made of bistable apparent-motion displays in trying to answer this question. Two spots were flashed simultaneously on diagonally opposite corners of a 1 deg wide square and then switched off and replaced by two spots appearing on the other two corners. One can either see vertical or horizontal oscillation and the display is bistable just as a Necker cube is. If several such bistable figures are randomly scattered on the screen and presented simultaneously, then one usually sees the same motion axis in all of them, suggesting the presence of field-like effects for resolving ambiguity in apparent motion. While viewing a single figure observers experience hysteresis: they tend to adhere to one motion axis or the other and can switch the axis only by looking away and looking back after 10–30 s have elapsed. The figure can be switched off and made to reappear at some other random location on the screen and it is then always found to retain its motion axis. Several such demonstrations are presented to show that spatial induction effects in metastable motion displays may provide a particularly valuable probe for studying ‘laws’ of perceptual organization.

scholarly journals A comparison of the effects of spatial separation on apparent motion in the auditory and visual modalities

1990 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 439-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Z. Strybel ◽  
Carol L. Manligas ◽  
Ozzie Chan ◽  
David R. Perrott
Keyword(s):  
Apparent Motion ◽  
Spatial Separation
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document