scholarly journals Perceptual Evidence for Interhemispheric Visual Integration

i-Perception ◽  
10.1068/ic286 ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 286-286
Author(s):  
Izumi Ohzawa ◽  
Tatsuhiko Katayama ◽  
Yusuke Asada ◽  
Takayuki Nakazono
2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (09) ◽  
pp. 587-592
Author(s):  
Antonio M. Reyes-Rodríguez ◽  
Justo García-Sanz-Calcedo ◽  
Lorenzo García-Moruno ◽  
Julio Hernández-Blanco

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alina Schulte ◽  
Christiane M. Thiel ◽  
Anja Gieseler ◽  
Maike Tahden ◽  
Hans Colonius ◽  
...  

Abstract Age-related hearing loss has been related to a compensatory increase in audio-visual integration and neural reorganization including alterations in functional resting state connectivity. How these two changes are linked in elderly listeners is unclear. The current study explored modulatory effects of hearing thresholds and audio-visual integration on resting state functional connectivity. We analysed a large set of resting state data of 65 elderly participants with a widely varying degree of untreated hearing loss. Audio-visual integration, as gauged with the McGurk effect, increased with progressing hearing thresholds. On the neural level, McGurk illusions were negatively related to functional coupling between motor and auditory regions. Similarly, connectivity of the dorsal attention network to sensorimotor and primary motor cortices was reduced with increasing hearing loss. The same effect was obtained for connectivity between the salience network and visual cortex. Our findings suggest that with progressing untreated age-related hearing loss, functional coupling at rest declines, affecting connectivity of brain networks and areas associated with attentional, visual, sensorimotor and motor processes. Especially connectivity reductions between auditory and motor areas were related to stronger audio-visual integration found with increasing hearing loss.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Paul Boyce ◽  
Anthony Lindsay ◽  
Arkady Zgonnikov ◽  
Iñaki Rañó ◽  
KongFatt Wong-Lin

1973 ◽  
Vol 36 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1063-1066 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew H. Gregory ◽  
H. Margaret Gregory

Two auditory-visual integration tests were given to 86 children from 6 yr. to 11 yr. One test was basically that developed by Birch; the other used Morse-type stimuli. The children were also given tests of nonverbal intelligence, reading and vocabulary. With age and intelligence partialled out, the Morse form of test was significantly more highly correlated with reading ability than the Birch test. Reasons are suggested as to why the Morse version may be a better test of some of the underlying skills involved in reading.


2018 ◽  
Vol 265 ◽  
pp. 271-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tyler B. Grove ◽  
Beier Yao ◽  
Savanna A. Mueller ◽  
Merranda McLaughlin ◽  
Vicki L. Ellingrod ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Natasha Warner ◽  
Daniel Brenner ◽  
Jessamyn Schertz ◽  
Andrew Carnie ◽  
Muriel Fisher ◽  
...  

AbstractScottish Gaelic is sometimes described as having nasalized fricatives (/ṽ/ distinctively, and [f̃, x̃, h̃], etc. through assimilation). However, there are claims that it is not aerodynamically possible to open the velum for nasalization while maintaining frication noise. We present aerodynamic data from 14 native Scottish Gaelic speakers to determine how the posited nasalized fricatives in this language are realized. Most tokens demonstrate loss of nasalization, but nasalization does occur in some contexts without aerodynamic conflict, e.g., nasalization with the consonant realized as an approximant, nasalization of [h̃], nasalization on the preceding vowel, or sequential frication and nasalization. Furthermore, a very few tokens do contain simultaneous nasalization and frication with a trade-off in airflow. We also present perceptual evidence showing that Gaelic listeners can hear this distinction slightly better than chance. Thus, instrumental data from one of the few languages in the world described as having nasalized fricatives confirms that the claimed sounds are not made by producing strong nasalization concurrently with clear frication noise. Furthermore, although speakers most often neutralize the nasalization, when they maintain it, they do so through a variety of phonetic mechanisms, even within a single language.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document