Inferior alveolar nerve injury related to mandibular third molar surgery: An unusual case presentation

2002 ◽  
Vol 93 (3) ◽  
pp. 358-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas A. Drage ◽  
Tara Renton
Keyword(s):  
Nerve Injury ◽  
Unusual Case ◽  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Third Molar Surgery ◽  
Case Presentation ◽  
Mandibular Third Molar ◽  
Mandibular Third Molar Surgery ◽  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Injury

scholarly journals Comparison of Articaine and Lidocaine for Buccal Infiltration After Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block For Intraoperative Pain Control During Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgery

2017 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 80-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geraldo Prisco da Silva-Junior ◽  
Liane Maciel de Almeida Souza ◽  
Francisco Carlos Groppo
Keyword(s):  
Nerve Block ◽  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Third Molar Surgery ◽  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block ◽  
Mandibular Third Molar ◽  
Intraoperative Pain ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Mandibular Third Molar Surgery ◽  
Buccal Infiltration

In order to compare the efficacy of lidocaine and articaine for pain control during third molar surgery, 160 patients presenting bilateral asymptomatic impacted mandibular third molars were selected. They received 1.8 mL of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 during inferior alveolar nerve block. In group 1 (n = 80), an infiltrative injection of 0.9 mL of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 was performed in buccal-distal mucosa of the third molar. Group 2 (n = 80) received 0.9 mL of 4% articaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 in the contralateral side. All procedures were performed at the same visit, by a single operator, in a double-blind and parallel design. The duration of each surgery and the moment when the patient expressed pain were noted. Data were analyzed by nonpaired t test and chi-square test (alpha = 5%). Duration of surgery did not differ (p = .83) between Groups 1 (19.8 ± 2.3 minutes) and 2 (19.7 ± 3.0 minutes). Pain was expressed more in group 1 (26.3%) than in group 2 (10%) (odds ratio = 3.2, p = .0138). In both groups, tooth sectioning was the most painful event (p < .0001). No influence of gender (p = .85) or age (p = .96) was observed in pain response. Buccal infiltration of 4% articaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 showed more efficacy than 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 when used in combination with inferior alveolar nerve block in controlling intraoperative pain related to impacted mandibular third molar surgery.

scholarly journals Alternative approach to prevent inferior alveolar nerve injury in lower third molar surgery: A pilot study on coronectomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 415
Author(s):  
Vannala Venkataramana ◽  
Prabakaran Sureshkannan ◽  
KuriadomSam Thomas ◽  
Annamalai Thangavelu ◽  
Sambandham Thiruneelakandan
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Nerve Injury ◽  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Third Molar Surgery ◽  
Alternative Approach ◽  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Injury

scholarly journals Inferior alveolar nerve injury assessment after surgical removal of mandibular third molar.

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (03) ◽  
pp. 530-534
Author(s):  
Abdul Wahid Bhangwar ◽  
Muhammad Irfan Khan ◽  
Hira Fatima ◽  
Salman Shams
Keyword(s):  
Nerve Injury ◽  
Local Anesthesia ◽  
Maxillofacial Surgery ◽  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Surgical Removal ◽  
Third Molars ◽  
Mandibular Third Molar ◽  
Mandibular Third Molars ◽  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Injury

To assess the nerve injury (inferior alveolar nerve) after surgical removal of mandibular third molars under local anesthesia. Study Design: Observational study. Setting: Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Department LUMHS Jamshoro/Hyderabad. Period: From 11th November 2015 to 10th May 2016. Material & Methods: This study consisted of one hundred patients. Inclusion criteria’s were patients with impacted mandibular third molar, patient’s age from 18 to 45years and irrespective of gender. Exclusion criteria were patients younger than 18yrs of age of above 45 years, patients having neurological disorders, medically compromised patients, patients receiving radiotherapy or chemotherapy, patients with known allergy to local anesthesia, patients having pathology due to mandibular third molars, patients radiographicaly root is very near to inferior dental canal. Results: Out of 100 patients incorporated in this research 66 were male (66%) and 34 female (34%). The mean age was 29+3.20 years. Common indication of extraction were recurrent pericoronitis  52(52%) cases followed by deep caries/ pulpitis in 28(28%)  cases, orthodontic reason in 11(11%) cases and caries to adjacent tooth in 9(9%) cases. Third molar impaction according to winter’s classification were Mesioangular in 54(54%) cases followed by Horizontal in 26(26%) cases and Vertical in 11(11%). Radiographic showed Narrowing of root in 21% cases and narrowing of inferior dental (ID) canal 20% cases, followed by diversion of ID canal in 16 % cases, deflection of root 14 % cases and darkening of root in 11% cases. After surgical removal of mandibular third molar, the inferior alveolar nerve injury was observed in 6(6%) cases. Conclusion: We conclude that inferior alveolar nerve paresthesia occurs in 6% after surgical removal of mandibular third molars.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document