Vaginal birth after cesarean section versus elective repeat cesarean delivery: Weight-based outcomes

2003 ◽  
Vol 188 (6) ◽  
pp. 1516-1522 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.Shannon Carroll ◽  
Everett F. Magann ◽  
Suneet P. Chauhan ◽  
Chad K. Klauser ◽  
John C. Morrison
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Vaginal Birth ◽  
Vaginal Birth After Cesarean ◽  
Section Versus ◽  
Elective Repeat Cesarean ◽  
Repeat Cesarean Delivery

scholarly journals Publisher Correction: Understanding Factors Leading to Primary Cesarean Section and Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery in the Friuli-Venezia Giulia Region (North-Eastern Italy), 2005–2015

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Cegolon ◽  
G. Mastrangelo ◽  
G. Maso ◽  
G. Dal Pozzo ◽  
L. Ronfani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Vaginal Birth ◽  
Vaginal Birth After Cesarean ◽  
North Eastern ◽  
Friuli Venezia Giulia

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

scholarly journals Predictors of success of trial of labor after cesarean section: A nested case–control study at public hospitals in Eastern Ethiopia

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 174550652110619
Author(s):  
Maleda Tefera ◽  
Nega Assefa ◽  
Kedir Teji Roba ◽  
Letta Gedefa
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Vaginal Birth ◽  
Public Hospitals ◽  
Vaginal Birth After Cesarean ◽  
Eastern Ethiopia ◽  
Trial Of Labor ◽  
History Of ◽  
Nested Case Control

Background: One of the primary reasons for an increase in cesarean sections is obstetricians’ uncertainty about labor trial safety following a previous cesarean section. The success rate of vaginal birth after cesarean section with a single cesarean scar is greater than 50%. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is a scarcity of information on the determinants of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in the study area. As a result, the purpose of this study was to identify predictors of successful vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in public hospitals in Eastern Ethiopia. Methods: A nested case–control study design was used within a prospective follow-up study conducted from June to October 2020. A total of 220 women who tried vaginal birth after cesarean delivery was included, 110 cases and 110 controls. Cases were women with one previous cesarean section scar and successfully proceed with vaginal delivery. The controls were those with an earlier cesarean section scar and delivered by emergency cesarean section after trial of labor. A pre-tested structured questionnaire was used to gather the information. Multiple logistic regression is used to identify the determinants for the success of vaginal birth after cesarean section; odds ratio with its 95% CI are used to report the findings. Results: We found that living in rural areas (AOR = 2.28; 95% CI (1.85, 12.41)), having a current antenatal care follow-up (AOR = 3.20; 95% CI (1.15, 8.87)) and partograph monitoring of labor (AOR = 4.26; 95% CI (1.90, 9.57)) had a positive association with successful vaginal birth after cesarean section. In contrast, the presence of meconium-stained amniotic liquor (AOR = 0.10; 95% CI (0.01, 0.75)) and history of stillbirth (AOR = 0.07; 95% CI (0.02, 0.53)) reducing the chance of success of the trial. Conclusion: Past obstetric history, such as stillbirth, history of labor trial after primary cesarean section, and prior vaginal birth, were significant predictors for achieving vaginal birth after cesarean section. Antenatal care visit, and partograph follow-up were the current obstetric characteristics positively associated with the trial of labor.

scholarly journals The association of interpregnancy interval and mode of delivery with outcomes among a cohort of Guatemalan women with a history of prior cesarean

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margo Harrison ◽  
Ana Garces ◽  
Lester Figueroa ◽  
Jamie Westcott ◽  
Michael Hambidge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Vaginal Birth ◽  
Delivery Mode ◽  
Interpregnancy Interval ◽  
Vaginal Birth After Cesarean ◽  
Cesarean Birth ◽  
Dilation And Curettage ◽  
History Of ◽  
Repeat Cesarean Delivery

Abstract Design: Our objectives were to analyze how interpregnancy interval (IPI) was associated with delivery mode and how outcomes varied by these characteristics.Methods: This secondary analysis used data from a prospective study conducted in Chimaltenango, Guatemala from January 2017 through April 2020.Results: Of 26,465 Guatemalan women, 3,170 (12.0%) had a history of prior cesarean. 560 (20.1%) women delivered by vaginal birth after cesarean with the remaining 2,233 (79.9%) delivered by repeat cesarean delivery. Repeat cesarean reduced the risk of needing a dilation and curettage compared to vaginal birth after cesarean, but this association did not vary by IPI (AOR 0.01 – 0.03, p < 0.001). Repeat cesarean delivery, as compared to vaginal birth after cesarean, significantly reduced the likelihood a woman breastfeeding within one hour of birth (AOR 0.009 – 0.10, p < 0.001), but IPI was not associated with the outcome. Regarding stillbirth, repeat cesarean birth reduced the likelihood of stillbirth as compared to vaginal birth (AOR 0.2, p = 0.001 – 0.002), but again IPI was not associated with the outcome.Conclusion: Outcomes by mode of delivery among a Guatemalan cohort of women with a history of prior cesarean birth do not vary by IPI.

Analytic Study of Indications and Complications Associated with Cesarean Section in Omar AL-Mukhtar Hospital

2021 ◽  
pp. 140-146
Author(s):  
Faiza. A. Muhammad Taher ◽  
Marfoua. S. Ali
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Fetal Distress ◽  
Progressive Increase ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Anesthetic Complications ◽  
Cesarean Delivery Rate ◽  
Indications And Complications ◽  
Elective Repeat Cesarean ◽  
Repeat Cesarean Delivery

Cesarean section (C-section) is a surgical procedure designed to ensure the safety of the mother and the child when vaginal delivery is not possible. There is a progressive increase in cesarean deliveries across the world. C-section is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in pregnant mothers and infants, particularly in developing countries. The aim of the current study was designed to determine the rate and identify the indications and find out complications associated with C-sections in Omar AL-Mukhtar hospital. The descriptive retrospective study was carried out with data retrieved from statistics files from January 2018 to December 2018. A total of 754 births during the study period, out of the 226 were delivered by C-section. The overall C-section rate was 29.9%. The maximum number of C-sections was in the age group of 31-40 years (42%) followed by 41.2% of women in the age group of 21-30 years. The most common indication was elective repeated C-section (17%) followed by previous one C-section with other causes (10.6%), fetal distress (9.29%). The complications in our study were about 47 cases and were less accounted for (20.79%), like, postpartum and intraoperative hemorrhage, and anesthetic complications, which represented 5.75%, and 10.62% respectively. In conclusion: The cesarean delivery rate in this study was higher than the WHO recommendation, and elective repeat cesarean delivery was a major common indicator. Keywords: C-section; Indication; Complication of C- section

scholarly journals Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Section vs Elective Repeat Cesarean Section: A Cost-consequence Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-43
Author(s):  
Arunasalam Pathmeswaran ◽  
Chanil D Ekanayake ◽  
Rasika Herath ◽  
Prasantha Wijesinghe ◽  
Swetha Thangasamy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Vaginal Birth ◽  
Vaginal Birth After Cesarean ◽  
Consequence Analysis ◽  
Cost Consequence ◽  
Repeat Cesarean Section ◽  
Elective Repeat Cesarean
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document