A state-wide assessment of the obstetric, anesthesia, and operative team personnel who are available to manage the labors and deliveries and to treat the complications of women who attempt vaginal birth after cesarean delivery

2002 ◽  
Vol 187 (3) ◽  
pp. 611-614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin P. Lavin ◽  
Linda DiPasquale ◽  
Stephen Crane ◽  
John Stewart
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Obstetric Anesthesia ◽  
Vaginal Birth ◽  
Vaginal Birth After Cesarean

scholarly journals Publisher Correction: Understanding Factors Leading to Primary Cesarean Section and Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery in the Friuli-Venezia Giulia Region (North-Eastern Italy), 2005–2015

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Cegolon ◽  
G. Mastrangelo ◽  
G. Maso ◽  
G. Dal Pozzo ◽  
L. Ronfani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Vaginal Birth ◽  
Vaginal Birth After Cesarean ◽  
North Eastern ◽  
Friuli Venezia Giulia

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

scholarly journals Predictors of success of trial of labor after cesarean section: A nested case–control study at public hospitals in Eastern Ethiopia

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 174550652110619
Author(s):  
Maleda Tefera ◽  
Nega Assefa ◽  
Kedir Teji Roba ◽  
Letta Gedefa
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Vaginal Birth ◽  
Public Hospitals ◽  
Vaginal Birth After Cesarean ◽  
Eastern Ethiopia ◽  
Trial Of Labor ◽  
History Of ◽  
Nested Case Control

Background: One of the primary reasons for an increase in cesarean sections is obstetricians’ uncertainty about labor trial safety following a previous cesarean section. The success rate of vaginal birth after cesarean section with a single cesarean scar is greater than 50%. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is a scarcity of information on the determinants of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in the study area. As a result, the purpose of this study was to identify predictors of successful vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in public hospitals in Eastern Ethiopia. Methods: A nested case–control study design was used within a prospective follow-up study conducted from June to October 2020. A total of 220 women who tried vaginal birth after cesarean delivery was included, 110 cases and 110 controls. Cases were women with one previous cesarean section scar and successfully proceed with vaginal delivery. The controls were those with an earlier cesarean section scar and delivered by emergency cesarean section after trial of labor. A pre-tested structured questionnaire was used to gather the information. Multiple logistic regression is used to identify the determinants for the success of vaginal birth after cesarean section; odds ratio with its 95% CI are used to report the findings. Results: We found that living in rural areas (AOR = 2.28; 95% CI (1.85, 12.41)), having a current antenatal care follow-up (AOR = 3.20; 95% CI (1.15, 8.87)) and partograph monitoring of labor (AOR = 4.26; 95% CI (1.90, 9.57)) had a positive association with successful vaginal birth after cesarean section. In contrast, the presence of meconium-stained amniotic liquor (AOR = 0.10; 95% CI (0.01, 0.75)) and history of stillbirth (AOR = 0.07; 95% CI (0.02, 0.53)) reducing the chance of success of the trial. Conclusion: Past obstetric history, such as stillbirth, history of labor trial after primary cesarean section, and prior vaginal birth, were significant predictors for achieving vaginal birth after cesarean section. Antenatal care visit, and partograph follow-up were the current obstetric characteristics positively associated with the trial of labor.

scholarly journals The association of interpregnancy interval and mode of delivery with outcomes among a cohort of Guatemalan women with a history of prior cesarean

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margo Harrison ◽  
Ana Garces ◽  
Lester Figueroa ◽  
Jamie Westcott ◽  
Michael Hambidge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Vaginal Birth ◽  
Delivery Mode ◽  
Interpregnancy Interval ◽  
Vaginal Birth After Cesarean ◽  
Cesarean Birth ◽  
Dilation And Curettage ◽  
History Of ◽  
Repeat Cesarean Delivery

Abstract Design: Our objectives were to analyze how interpregnancy interval (IPI) was associated with delivery mode and how outcomes varied by these characteristics.Methods: This secondary analysis used data from a prospective study conducted in Chimaltenango, Guatemala from January 2017 through April 2020.Results: Of 26,465 Guatemalan women, 3,170 (12.0%) had a history of prior cesarean. 560 (20.1%) women delivered by vaginal birth after cesarean with the remaining 2,233 (79.9%) delivered by repeat cesarean delivery. Repeat cesarean reduced the risk of needing a dilation and curettage compared to vaginal birth after cesarean, but this association did not vary by IPI (AOR 0.01 – 0.03, p < 0.001). Repeat cesarean delivery, as compared to vaginal birth after cesarean, significantly reduced the likelihood a woman breastfeeding within one hour of birth (AOR 0.009 – 0.10, p < 0.001), but IPI was not associated with the outcome. Regarding stillbirth, repeat cesarean birth reduced the likelihood of stillbirth as compared to vaginal birth (AOR 0.2, p = 0.001 – 0.002), but again IPI was not associated with the outcome.Conclusion: Outcomes by mode of delivery among a Guatemalan cohort of women with a history of prior cesarean birth do not vary by IPI.

Neonatal brachial plexus palsy with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a case-control study

2013 ◽  
Vol 208 (3) ◽  
pp. 229.e1-229.e5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ibrahim A. Hammad ◽  
Suneet P. Chauhan ◽  
Robert B. Gherman ◽  
Joseph G. Ouzounian ◽  
James B. Hill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Case Control Study ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Vaginal Birth ◽  
Brachial Plexus Palsy ◽  
Vaginal Birth After Cesarean ◽  
Neonatal Brachial Plexus Palsy ◽  
Control Study
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document