Bilateral uterosacral ligament vaginal vault suspension with site-specific endopelvic fascia defect repair for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse

2000 ◽  
Vol 183 (6) ◽  
pp. 1402-1411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew D. Barber ◽  
Anthony G. Visco ◽  
Alison C. Weidner ◽  
Cindy L. Amundsen ◽  
Richard C. Bump
Keyword(s):  
Pelvic Organ Prolapse ◽  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Uterosacral Ligament ◽  
Vaginal Vault ◽  
Endopelvic Fascia ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
Vaginal Vault Suspension ◽  
Vault Suspension ◽  
Defect Repair

scholarly journals Utilization and perioperative outcomes of robotic vaginal vault suspension compared to abdominal or vaginal approaches for pelvic organ prolapse

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akshay Sood ◽  
Hanhan Li ◽  
Jesse Sammon ◽  
Florian Roghmann ◽  
Michael Ehlert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pelvic Organ Prolapse ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Intraoperative Complications ◽  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Vaginal Vault ◽  
Hospital Charges ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Vaginal Vault Suspension ◽  
Prolonged Length ◽  
Vault Suspension

Objectives: Robot-assisted vaginal vault suspension (RAVVS) for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) represents a minimally-invasive alternative to abdominal sacrocolpopexy. We measured perioperative outcomes and utilization rates of RAVVS.Methods: RAVVS (n = 2381) and open VVS (OVVS, n = 11080) data were extracted from the 2009-2010 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Propensity score-matched analysis compared patients undergoing RAVVS or OVVS for complications, mortality, prolonged length-of-stay, and elevated hospital charges.Results: Use of RAVVS for POP increased from 2009 to 2010 (16.3% to 19.2%). Patients undergoing RAVVS were more likely to be white (77.2% vs. 69.6%), to carry private insurance (52.8% vs. 46.0%) and to have fewer comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI] ≥1 = 17.5% vs. 26.6%). They were more likely to undergo surgery at urban (98.2% vs. 93.7%) and academic centres (75.7% vs. 56.7%). Patients undergoing RAVVS were less likely to receive a blood-transfusion (0.7% vs. 1.8%, p < 0.001) or experience prolonged length-of-stay (9.3% vs. 25.1%, p < 0.001). They had more intraoperative complications (6.0% vs. 4.2%, p < 0.001), and higher median hospital charges ($32 402 vs. $24 136, p < 0.001). Overall postoperative complications were equivalent (17.9%, p = 1.0), though there were differences in wound (0.4% vs. 1.3%, p < 0.001), genitourinary (4.9% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.009), and surgical (6.6% vs. 4.9%, p = 0.007) complications.Conclusions: The increasing use of RAVVS from 2009 to 2010 suggests a growth in the adoption of robotics to manage POP. We show that RAVVS is associated with decreased length of stay, fewer blood transfusions, as well as lower postoperative wound, genitourinary and vascular complications. The benefits of RAVVS are mitigated by higher hospital charges and higher rates of intraoperative complications.

scholarly journals To Compare the Effectiveness of Vaginal High Uterosacral Ligament Suspension and McCall's Culdoplasty during Vaginal Hysterectomy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-86
Author(s):  
Krutika Bhalerao ◽  
Anuja V Bhalerao ◽  
Richa Garg
Keyword(s):  
Pelvic Organ Prolapse ◽  
Coming Out ◽  
Vaginal Hysterectomy ◽  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Uterosacral Ligament ◽  
Vaginal Vault ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Uterosacral Ligament Suspension ◽  
Vaginal Length ◽  
Vault Suspension

ABSTRACT Introduction Vaginal vault prolapse can be prevented by supporting the vaginal cuff, which is an essential part of hysterectomy, whether done abdominally or vaginally. The American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (AAGL) has recommended for future research, specifically, a randomized trial comparing McCall's culdoplasty (with uterosacral ligament plication) with vaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension (HUSLS) (without plication), since both procedures are accessible to gynecological surgeons without urologic background. Hence, this study was carried out. Aim To compare both anatomic and functional outcomes of patients undergoing vaginal HUSLS or McCall's culdoplasty at the time of vaginal hysterectomy. Materials and methods This hospital-based prospective comparative study was carried out at a tertiary care hospital from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2015 over a period of 3 years after obtaining Ethical Committee approval. All women attending gynecological outpatient department having symptom of mass coming out of vagina were subjected to detailed history, examination, and later underwent either HUSLS (43) or McCall's culdoplasty (42), for vault suspension with concomitant hysterectomy. The effectiveness of both the procedures was assessed by preoperative and postoperative pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) and both were compared. Observations There was statistically significant improvement in all the sites of POP-Q points by HUSLS and McCall's culdoplasty as a method of vault suspension except in total vaginal length (TVL). Vault suspension by HUSLS is better than McCall's culdoplasty. All the points of POP-Q showed better results but the point C was significantly placed at a higher level by HUSLS (p = 0.000) as compared with McCall's culdoplasty. The time required for HUSLS was statistically more as compared with repair by McCall's culdoplasty (81.55/74.53 minutes, T: 1.981, p: 0.05). Complications, such as hemorrhage and ureteric injuries were more in HUSLS (2/43, 4.8%) as compared with McCall's culdoplasty (0/42); this is statistically significant. Conclusion High uterosacral ligament suspension provides excellent suspensory support to vaginal vault. Vagina is suspended over the levator ani with normal axis toward sacrum. By doing HUSLS, the vagina is symmetrically supported directed toward the hollow of sacrum. High uterosacral ligament suspension is highly recommended for young women with POP as vaginal length is not altered at all and so is the quality of life. How to cite this article Bhalerao AV, Bhalerao K, Garg R. To Compare the Effectiveness of Vaginal High Uterosacral Ligament Suspension and McCall's Culdoplasty during Vaginal Hysterectomy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. J South Asian Feder Menopause Soc 2017;5(2):81-86.

scholarly journals Protocol for a prospective multisite cohort study investigating hysterectomy versus uterine preservation for pelvic organ prolapse surgery: the HUPPS study

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. e053679
Author(s):  
Natalie V Scime ◽  
Kaylee Ramage ◽  
Erin A Brennand
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Pelvic Organ Prolapse ◽  
Pelvic Organ ◽  
Vaginal Vault ◽  
Service Utilisation ◽  
Uterine Preservation ◽  
Subjective Report ◽  
Vaginal Vault Suspension ◽  
Pop Surgery ◽  
Vault Suspension

IntroductionPelvic organ prolapse (POP) is the descent of pelvic organs into the vagina resulting in bulge symptoms and occurs in approximately 50% of women. Almost 20% of women will elect surgical correction of this condition by age 85. Removal of the uterus (hysterectomy) with concomitant vaginal vault suspension is a long-standing practice in POP surgery to address apical (uterine) prolapse. Yet, contemporary evidence on the merits of this approach relative to preservation of the uterus through suspension is needed to better inform surgical decision making by patients and their healthcare providers. The objective of this study is to evaluate POP-specific health outcomes and service utilisation of women electing uterine suspension compared with those electing hysterectomy and vaginal vault suspension for POP surgery up to 1-year postsurgery.Methods and analysisThis is a prospective cohort study planning to enrol 321 adult women with stage ≥2 POP from multiple sites in Alberta, Canada. Following standardised counselling from study surgeons, participants self-select either a hysterectomy based or uterine preservation surgical group. Data are being collected through participant questionnaires, medical records and administrative data linkage at four time points spanning from the presurgical consultation to 1-year postsurgery. The primary outcome is anatomic failure to correct POP, and secondary outcomes include changes in positioning of pelvic structures, retreatment, subjective report of bulge symptoms, pelvic floor distress and impact, sexual function and health service use. Data will be analysed using inverse probability weighting of propensity scores and generalised linear models.Ethics and disseminationThis study is approved by the Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board at the University of Calgary (REB19-2134). Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, presentations at national and international conferences, and educational handouts for patients.Trial registration numberNCT04890951.

Uterosacral ligament vaginal vault suspension using delayed absorbable monofilament suture

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 1389-1394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Micheline J. Wong ◽  
Azadeh Rezvan ◽  
Narender N. Bhatia ◽  
Tajnoos Yazdany
Keyword(s):  
Uterosacral Ligament ◽  
Vaginal Vault ◽  
Vaginal Vault Suspension ◽  
Monofilament Suture ◽  
Vault Suspension
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document