scholarly journals Rank-reduced coupled-cluster III. Tensor hypercontraction of the doubles amplitudes

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward G. Hohenstein ◽  
Bryan Scott Fales ◽  
Robert M. Parrish ◽  
Todd J. Martinez
Keyword(s):  
Coupled Cluster

The relativistic coupled-cluster method: transition energies of bismuth and eka-bismuth

1998 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
pp. 181-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
EPHRAIM ELIAV ◽  
UZI KALDOR ◽  
YASUYUKI ISHIKAWA
Keyword(s):  
Cluster Method ◽  
Coupled Cluster ◽  
Coupled Cluster Method ◽  
Transition Energies

Adiabatic electron affinities of PF5 and SF6: a coupled-cluster study

1998 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gennady GUTSEV ◽  
RODNEY BARTLETT
Keyword(s):  
Coupled Cluster ◽  
Electron Affinities

A Multi-Layer Approach to the Equation of Motion Coupled-Cluster Method for the Electron Affinity

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soumi Haldar ◽  
Achintya Kumar Dutta
Keyword(s):  
Electron Affinity ◽  
Electron Attachment ◽  
Equation Of Motion ◽  
Cluster Method ◽  
Coupled Cluster ◽  
Coupled Cluster Method ◽  
Large Molecules ◽  
Layer Method ◽  
Speed Up ◽  
Attachment Process

We have presented a multi-layer implementation of the equation of motion coupled-cluster method for the electron affinity, based on local and pair natural orbitals. The method gives consistent accuracy for both localized and delocalized anionic states. It results in many fold speedup in computational timing as compared to the canonical and DLPNO based implementation of the EA-EOM-CCSD method. We have also developed an explicit fragment-based approach which can lead to even higher speed-up with little loss in accuracy. The multi-layer method can be used to treat the environmental effect of both bonded and non-bonded nature on the electron attachment process in large molecules.<br>

The X40x10 Halogen Bonding Benchmark Revisited: Surprising Importance of (n-1)d Subvalence Correlation

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manoj Kumar Kesharwani ◽  
Nitai Sylvetsky ◽  
Debashree Manna ◽  
Jan M.L. Martin
Keyword(s):  
Dissociation Energy ◽  
Noncovalent Interactions ◽  
Halogen Bonding ◽  
Coupled Cluster ◽  
Dissociation Energies ◽  
Iodine Species ◽  
Explicitly Correlated ◽  
High Level ◽  
Cluster Methods ◽  
Small Separation

<p>We have re-evaluated the X40x10 benchmark for halogen bonding using conventional and explicitly correlated coupled cluster methods. For the aromatic dimers at small separation, improved CCSD(T)–MP2 “high-level corrections” (HLCs) cause substantial reductions in the dissociation energy. For the bromine and iodine species, (n-1)d subvalence correlation increases dissociation energies, and turns out to be more important for noncovalent interactions than is generally realized. As in previous studies, we find that the most efficient way to obtain HLCs is to combine (T) from conventional CCSD(T) calculations with explicitly correlated CCSD-F12–MP2-F12 differences.</p>

Excitonic Coupled-cluster Theory: Part I, General Formalism

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuhong Liu ◽  
Anthony Dutoi
Keyword(s):  
Electron Correlation ◽  
Degrees Of Freedom ◽  
Model Systems ◽  
Coupled Cluster ◽  
Effective Hamiltonian ◽  
Coupled Cluster Theory ◽  
Cluster Theory ◽  
Companion Article ◽  
High Level ◽  
Fragment Interaction

<div> <div>A shortcoming of presently available fragment-based methods is that electron correlation (if included) is described at the level of individual electrons, resulting in many redundant evaluations of the electronic relaxations associated with any given fluctuation. A generalized variant of coupled-cluster (CC) theory is described, wherein the degrees of freedom are fluctuations of fragments between internally correlated states. The effects of intra-fragment correlation on the inter-fragment interaction is pre-computed and permanently folded into the effective Hamiltonian. This article provides a high-level description of the CC variant, establishing some useful notation, and it demonstrates the advantage of the proposed paradigm numerically on model systems. A companion article shows that the electronic Hamiltonian of real systems may always be cast in the form demanded. This framework opens a promising path to build finely tunable systematically improvable methods to capture precise properties of systems interacting with a large number of other systems. </div> </div>

Excitonic Coupled-cluster Theory: Part I, General Formalism

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuhong Liu ◽  
Anthony Dutoi
Keyword(s):  
Electron Correlation ◽  
Degrees Of Freedom ◽  
Model Systems ◽  
Coupled Cluster ◽  
Effective Hamiltonian ◽  
Coupled Cluster Theory ◽  
Cluster Theory ◽  
Companion Article ◽  
High Level ◽  
Fragment Interaction

<div> <div>A shortcoming of presently available fragment-based methods is that electron correlation (if included) is described at the level of individual electrons, resulting in many redundant evaluations of the electronic relaxations associated with any given fluctuation. A generalized variant of coupled-cluster (CC) theory is described, wherein the degrees of freedom are fluctuations of fragments between internally correlated states. The effects of intra-fragment correlation on the inter-fragment interaction is pre-computed and permanently folded into the effective Hamiltonian. This article provides a high-level description of the CC variant, establishing some useful notation, and it demonstrates the advantage of the proposed paradigm numerically on model systems. A companion article shows that the electronic Hamiltonian of real systems may always be cast in the form demanded. This framework opens a promising path to build finely tunable systematically improvable methods to capture precise properties of systems interacting with a large number of other systems. </div> </div>

Double Precision Is Not Needed for Many-Body Calculations: New Conventional Wisdom

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pavel Pokhilko ◽  
Evgeny Epifanovsky ◽  
Anna I. Krylov
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Computation Time ◽  
Coupled Cluster ◽  
Double Precision ◽  
Many Body ◽  
Single Precision ◽  
Parallel Performance ◽  
Point Representation ◽  
Electron Repulsion Integrals ◽  
Cluster Methods

Using single precision floating point representation reduces the size of data and computation time by a factor of two relative to double precision conventionally used in electronic structure programs. For large-scale calculations, such as those encountered in many-body theories, reduced memory footprint alleviates memory and input/output bottlenecks. Reduced size of data can lead to additional gains due to improved parallel performance on CPUs and various accelerators. However, using single precision can potentially reduce the accuracy of computed observables. Here we report an implementation of coupled-cluster and equation-of-motion coupled-cluster methods with single and double excitations in single precision. We consider both standard implementation and one using Cholesky decomposition or resolution-of-the-identity of electron-repulsion integrals. Numerical tests illustrate that when single precision is used in correlated calculations, the loss of accuracy is insignificant and pure single-precision implementation can be used for computing energies, analytic gradients, excited states, and molecular properties. In addition to pure single-precision calculations, our implementation allows one to follow a single-precision calculation by clean-up iterations, fully recovering double-precision results while retaining significant savings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document