Review on methods of drag reduction for two-phase horizontal flows

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prashant Baghele ◽  
Pramod Pachghare
1976 ◽  
Vol 54 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 111-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lambert Otten ◽  
Abdelrahman S. Fayed

2009 ◽  
Vol 131 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
R. L. J. Fernandes ◽  
B. A. Fleck ◽  
T. R. Heidrick ◽  
L. Torres ◽  
M. G. Rodriguez

Experimental investigation of drag reduction in vertical two-phase annular flow is presented. The work is a feasibility test for applying drag reducing additives (DRAs) in high production-rate gas-condensate wells where friction in the production tubing limits the production rate. The DRAs are intended to reduce the overall pressure gradient and thereby increase the production rate. Since such wells typically operate in the annular-entrained flow regime, the gas and liquid velocities were chosen such that the experiments were in a vertical two-phase annular flow. The drag reducers had two main effects on the flow. As expected, they reduced the frictional component of the pressure gradient by up to 74%. However, they also resulted in a significant increase in the liquid holdup by up to 27%. This phenomenon is identified as “DRA-induced flooding.” Since the flow was vertical, the increase in the liquid holdup increased the hydrostatic component of the pressure gradient by up to 25%, offsetting some of reduction in the frictional component of the pressure gradient. The DRA-induced flooding was most pronounced at the lowest gas velocities. However, the results show that in the annular flow the net effect will generally be a reduction in the overall pressure gradient by up to 82%. The findings here help to establish an envelope of operations for the application of multiphase drag reduction in vertical flows and indicate the conditions where a significant net reduction of the pressure gradient may be expected.


2012 ◽  
Vol 433-440 ◽  
pp. 463-470
Author(s):  
Lei Liu ◽  
Xin Feng Guo ◽  
Qiu Yue Guo ◽  
Hui Qing Fan ◽  
Zhu Hai Zhong

It is significant to make researches on drag reduction in two-phase transport pipeline because two-phase flow has high energy dissipation. API X 52 steel pipe with diameter of 40mm is used in this paper to simulate pipeline with different inclination geometry including horizontal, up-inclined and vertical sections. The up-inclined section has an inclination angle of eight degree. Experiments and theoretical analysis are carried out to study the drag reduction characteristics of gas-liquid two-phase flow in these three sections. The drag reducing agents used here is polyacrylamide. It is found that two-phase drag reduction varies with pipe inclination geometry. The largest drag reduction efficiency occurs in horizontal pipes and which is up to seventy percent. Drag reduction efficiency in up-inclined section is up to sixty percent. Drag reduction in vertical section is the lowest and which can be up to about thirty percent. A mechanistic drag reduction model is proposed to predict drag reduction in gas-liquid two-phase flow. The results predicted are in good agreement with the experiment data.


2017 ◽  
Vol 139 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego N. Venturi ◽  
Waldir P. Martignoni ◽  
Dirceu Noriler ◽  
Henry F. Meier

Two-phase flows across tube bundles are very commonly found in industrial heat exchange equipment such as shell and tube heat exchangers. However, recent studies published in the literature are generally performed on devices where the flow crosses the tube bundle in only a vertical or horizontal direction, lacking geometrical fidelity with industrial models, and the majority of them use air and water as the working fluids. Also, currently, experimental approaches and simulations are based on very simplified models. This paper reports the simulation of a laboratory full-scale tube bundle with a combination of vertical and horizontal flows and with two different baffle configurations. Also, it presents a similarity analysis to evaluate the influence of changing the fluids to hydrogen and diesel in the operational conditions of the hydrotreating. The volume of fluid (VOF) approach is used as the interface phenomena are very important. The air/water simulations show good agreement with classical correlations and are able to show the stratified behavior of the flow in the horizontal regions and the intermittent flow in the vertical regions. Also, the two baffle configurations are compared in terms of volume fraction and streamlines. When dealing with hydrogen/diesel flow using correlations and maps made for air/water, superficial velocity is recommended as similarity variable when a better prediction of the pressure drop is needed, and the modified superficial velocity is recommended for prediction of the volume-average void fraction and the outlet superficial void fraction.


Author(s):  
Ling Zhen ◽  
Claudia del Carmen Gutierrez-Torres

The question of “where and how the turbulent drag arises” is one of the most fundamental problems unsolved in fluid mechanics. However, the physical mechanism responsible for the friction drag reduction is still not well understood. Over decades, it is found that the turbulence production and self-containment in a boundary layer are organized phenomena and not random processes as the turbulence looks like. The further study in the boundary layer should be able to help us know more about the mechanisms of drag reduction. The wavelet-based vector multi-resolution technique was proposed and applied to the two dimensional PIV velocities for identifying the multi-scale turbulent structures. The intermediate and small scale vortices embedded within the large-scale vortices were separated and visualized. By analyzing the fluctuating velocities at different scales, coherent eddy structures were obtained and this help us obtain the important information on the multi-scale flow structures in the turbulent flow. By comparing the eddy structures in different operating conditions, the mechanism to explain the drag reduction caused by micro bubbles in turbulent flow was proposed.


2008 ◽  
Vol 4 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 183-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. E. G. Ferguson ◽  
P. L. Spedding

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document