scholarly journals Extended magnesium and calcium force field parameters for accurate ion–nucleic acid interactions in biomolecular simulations

2021 ◽  
Vol 154 (17) ◽  
pp. 171102
Author(s):  
Sergio Cruz-León ◽  
Kara K. Grotz ◽  
Nadine Schwierz
2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 391-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephan J. Bachmann ◽  
Zhixiong Lin ◽  
Thorsten Stafforst ◽  
Wilfred F. van Gunsteren ◽  
Jožica Dolenc

Author(s):  
Stephen D. Jett

The electrophoresis gel mobility shift assay is a popular method for the study of protein-nucleic acid interactions. The binding of proteins to DNA is characterized by a reduction in the electrophoretic mobility of the nucleic acid. Binding affinity, stoichiometry, and kinetics can be obtained from such assays; however, it is often desirable to image the various species in the gel bands using TEM. Present methods for isolation of nucleoproteins from gel bands are inefficient and often destroy the native structure of the complexes. We have developed a technique, called “snapshot blotting,” by which nucleic acids and nucleoprotein complexes in electrophoresis gels can be electrophoretically transferred directly onto carbon-coated grids for TEM imaging.


Author(s):  
Joshua Horton ◽  
Alice Allen ◽  
Leela Dodda ◽  
Daniel Cole

<div><div><div><p>Modern molecular mechanics force fields are widely used for modelling the dynamics and interactions of small organic molecules using libraries of transferable force field parameters. For molecules outside the training set, parameters may be missing or inaccurate, and in these cases, it may be preferable to derive molecule-specific parameters. Here we present an intuitive parameter derivation toolkit, QUBEKit (QUantum mechanical BEspoke Kit), which enables the automated generation of system-specific small molecule force field parameters directly from quantum mechanics. QUBEKit is written in python and combines the latest QM parameter derivation methodologies with a novel method for deriving the positions and charges of off-center virtual sites. As a proof of concept, we have re-derived a complete set of parameters for 109 small organic molecules, and assessed the accuracy by comparing computed liquid properties with experiment. QUBEKit gives highly competitive results when compared to standard transferable force fields, with mean unsigned errors of 0.024 g/cm3, 0.79 kcal/mol and 1.17 kcal/mol for the liquid density, heat of vaporization and free energy of hydration respectively. This indicates that the derived parameters are suitable for molecular modelling applications, including computer-aided drug design.</p></div></div></div>


Author(s):  
Joshua Horton ◽  
Alice Allen ◽  
Leela Dodda ◽  
Daniel Cole

<div><div><div><p>Modern molecular mechanics force fields are widely used for modelling the dynamics and interactions of small organic molecules using libraries of transferable force field parameters. For molecules outside the training set, parameters may be missing or inaccurate, and in these cases, it may be preferable to derive molecule-specific parameters. Here we present an intuitive parameter derivation toolkit, QUBEKit (QUantum mechanical BEspoke Kit), which enables the automated generation of system-specific small molecule force field parameters directly from quantum mechanics. QUBEKit is written in python and combines the latest QM parameter derivation methodologies with a novel method for deriving the positions and charges of off-center virtual sites. As a proof of concept, we have re-derived a complete set of parameters for 109 small organic molecules, and assessed the accuracy by comparing computed liquid properties with experiment. QUBEKit gives highly competitive results when compared to standard transferable force fields, with mean unsigned errors of 0.024 g/cm3, 0.79 kcal/mol and 1.17 kcal/mol for the liquid density, heat of vaporization and free energy of hydration respectively. This indicates that the derived parameters are suitable for molecular modelling applications, including computer-aided drug design.</p></div></div></div>


2002 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 610-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Ferré ◽  
Xavier Assfeld ◽  
Jean-Louis Rivail

RSC Advances ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (89) ◽  
pp. 48621-48631 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleanor R. Turpin ◽  
Sam Mulholland ◽  
Andrew M. Teale ◽  
Boyan B. Bonev ◽  
Jonathan D. Hirst

2000 ◽  
Vol 104 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 247-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacqueline Langlet ◽  
Jacqueline Berg�s ◽  
Jacqueline Caillet ◽  
Jiri Kozelka

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document