Range of motion measurement of Articulatio cubiti based on Hough transformation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mastri Cahyaningtyas Pediyanti ◽  
Riries Rulaningtyas ◽  
Akif Rahmatillah ◽  
Katherine
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Motion Measurement ◽  
Hough Transformation

Reliability of hip internal rotation range of motion measurement using a digital inclinometer

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (9) ◽  
pp. 2562-2567 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Krause ◽  
John H. Hollman ◽  
Aaron J. Krych ◽  
Michael M. Kalisvaart ◽  
Bruce A. Levy
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Internal Rotation ◽  
Motion Measurement ◽  
Digital Inclinometer ◽  
Hip Internal Rotation

Metacarpal Arc Motion: Comparison of Different Measurement Methods

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carina Büren ◽  
Abdullah Al Maktary ◽  
Joachim Windolf ◽  
Sebastian V. Gehrmann
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Measurement Methods ◽  
Optical Technique ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Motion Measurement ◽  
Left And Right ◽  
Palmar Flexion ◽  
Cmc Joint ◽  
Healthy Persons

Abstract Introduction The range of motion of the carpometacarpal (CMC) joints is difficult to assess in clinical practice. Materials and Methods The purpose of this study was to measure a precise range of motion measurement of the metacarpal arc during maximum palmar flexion of the fifth CMC joint in healthy persons with three different methods: optical, electrogoniometrical, and sonographical. Results The metacarpal arc motion measured with the optical technique was 24.9 degrees (standard deviation [SD]: 6.2 degrees), with the electrogoniometric technique was 24.3 degrees (SD: 3.6 degrees) and with sonography was 25.1 degrees (SD: 3.5 degrees), with no differences between left and right hand for all methods. Conclusion This study shows that different techniques can be used for the measurement of the metacarpal arc motion. With these techniques, it is possible to assess the metacarpal arc in patients with fractures to the CMC joints to evaluate posttraumatic function und rehabilitation progress. This study shows level of evidence as III.

Measuring Up to Expectation: Cognitive Bias in Wrist Range-of-Motion Measurement

2016 ◽  
Vol 46 (12) ◽  
pp. 1037-1041 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nirit Rotem-Lehrer ◽  
Natali Singer ◽  
Ofri Reshit ◽  
Shmuel Springer
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Cognitive Bias ◽  
Motion Measurement

TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY AND INTER-RATER RELIABILITY OF ELBOW RANGE OF MOTION MEASUREMENT

2007 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. S630 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y.H. Chunang ◽  
Y.C. Chang ◽  
Y.C. Hshiao ◽  
W.L. Wu ◽  
Y.L. Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Rater Reliability ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Motion Measurement ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

scholarly journals Real-Time Range of Motion Measurement of Physical Therapeutic Exercises

2017 ◽  
Vol 05 (09) ◽  
pp. 19-42
Author(s):  
Raghu Raj Prasanna Kumar ◽  
Suresh Muknahallipatna ◽  
John McInroy ◽  
Mark McKenna ◽  
Lori Franc
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Time Range ◽  
Motion Measurement ◽  
Therapeutic Exercises

scholarly journals Reliability of hip range of motion measurement among experienced arthroscopic hip preservation surgeons

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua D Harris ◽  
Richard C Mather ◽  
Shane J Nho ◽  
John P Salvo ◽  
Allston J Stubbs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Pelvic Tilt ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Motion Measurement ◽  
Hip Range Of Motion ◽  
Asymptomatic Volunteers ◽  
Hip Flexion ◽  
Hip Internal Rotation ◽  
Intra Class Correlation Coefficient

Abstract The aim of this study was to determine (i) the reliability of hip range of motion measurement among experienced arthroscopic hip preservation surgeons and (ii) the magnitude of hip flexion change with posterior pelvic tilt. Five experienced arthroscopic hip preservation surgeons (5–18 years of hip surgery experience) performed passive hip range of motion (internal and external rotation), flexion (contralateral hip extended) and flexion with posterior pelvic tilt (contralateral hip maximally flexed) on five young healthy asymptomatic volunteers (three males, two females; 34.4 ± 10.7 years of age). Motion was measured via digital photography and goniometry. Inter-observer reliability was calculated via two-way mixed, single measures, intra-class correlation coefficient. Paired t-test was utilized to compare hip flexion (with contralateral hip extended) to hip flexion with posterior pelvic tilt (with contralateral hip in forced flexion). The reliabilities of measurements of hip flexion with posterior pelvic tilt and external rotation were excellent, that of hip flexion was fair, and that of hip internal rotation was poor. The magnitude of hip flexion increase with posterior pelvic tilt was 17.0° ± 3.0° (P < 0.001). The reliability of hip range of motion measurement by five experienced arthroscopic hip preservation surgeons was excellent for measures of hip flexion with posterior pelvic tilt and external rotation. Contralateral maximal hip flexion significantly increased ipsilateral hip flexion (approximately 17°). Level of Evidence: Diagnostic, level III (without consistently applied reference standard)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document