scholarly journals Flow separation around a square cylinder at low to moderate Reynolds numbers

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 044103 ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 411 ◽  
pp. 1-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. ROSS ETHIER ◽  
SUJATA PRAKASH ◽  
DAVID A. STEINMAN ◽  
RICHARD L. LEASK ◽  
GREGORY G. COUCH ◽  
...  

Numerical and experimental techniques were used to study the physics of flow separation for steady internal flow in a 45° junction geometry, such as that observed between two pipes or between the downstream end of a bypass graft and an artery. The three-dimensional Navier–Stokes equations were solved using a validated finite element code, and complementary experiments were performed using the photochromic dye tracer technique. Inlet Reynolds numbers in the range 250 to 1650 were considered. An adaptive mesh refinement approach was adopted to ensure grid-independent solutions. Good agreement was observed between the numerical results and the experimentally measured velocity fields; however, the wall shear stress agreement was less satisfactory. Just distal to the ‘toe’ of the junction, axial flow separation was observed for all Reynolds numbers greater than 250. Further downstream (approximately 1.3 diameters from the toe), the axial flow again separated for Re [ges ] 450. The location and structure of axial flow separation in this geometry is controlled by secondary flows, which at sufficiently high Re create free stagnation points on the model symmetry plane. In fact, separation in this flow is best explained by a secondary flow boundary layer collision model, analogous to that proposed for flow in the entry region of a curved tube. Novel features of this flow include axial flow separation at modest Re (as compared to flow in a curved tube, where separation occurs only at much higher Re), and the existence and interaction of two distinct three-dimensional separation zones.


Author(s):  
Kenneth Van Treuren ◽  
Tyler Pharris ◽  
Olivia Hirst

The low-pressure turbine has become more important in the last few decades because of the increased emphasis on higher overall pressure and bypass ratios. The desire is to increase blade loading to reduce blade counts and stages in the low-pressure turbine of a gas turbine engine. Increased turbine inlet temperatures for newer cycles results in higher temperatures in the low-pressure turbine, especially the latter stages, where cooling technologies are not used. These higher temperatures lead to higher work from the turbine and this, combined with the high loadings, can lead to flow separation. Separation is more likely in engines operating at high altitudes and reduced throttle setting. At the high Reynolds numbers found at takeoff, the flow over a low-pressure turbine blade tends to stay attached. At lower blade Reynolds numbers (25,000 to 200,000), found during cruise at high altitudes, the flow on the suction surface of the low-pressure turbine blades is inclined to separate. This paper is a study on the flow characteristics of the L1A turbine blade at three low Reynolds numbers (60,000, 108,000, and 165,000) and 15 turbulence intensities (1.89% to 19.87%) in a steady flow cascade wind tunnel. With this data, it is possible to examine the impact of Reynolds number and turbulence intensity on the location of the initiation of flow separation, the flow separation zone, and the reattachment location. Quantifying the change in separated flow as a result of varying Reynolds numbers and turbulence intensities will help to characterize the low momentum flow environments in which the low-pressure turbine must operate and how this might impact the operation of the engine. Based on the data presented, it is possible to predict the location and size of the separation as a function of both the Reynolds number and upstream freestream turbulence intensity (FSTI). Being able to predict this flow behavior can lead to more effective blade designs using either passive or active flow control to reduce or eliminate flow separation.


Author(s):  
J. W. Douglas ◽  
S.-M. Li ◽  
B. Song ◽  
W. F. Ng ◽  
Toyotaka Sonoda ◽  
...  

Very little published literature documents the effects of different freestream turbulence intensities on compressor flows at realistically high Reynolds numbers. This paper presents a study of these effects on a transonic, linear, compressor stator cascade. The cascade consisted of high turning stator airfoils that had the camber of 55 degrees. The effects of freestream turbulence intensities of approximately 0.1% (baseline) and 1.6% were examined. Inlet Mach numbers to the cascade were tested from 0.55 to 0.89. Reynolds numbers, based on the inlet conditions and blade chord, varied between 1.0–2.0×106. Inlet flow angles to the cascade ranged from a choking to a stall condition. For the baseline cases, at most positive incidence angles to the cascade, surface oil flow visualization and Schlieren pictures showed a significant flow separation on the suction surface of the blade. Under these conditions, the increase in freestream turbulence from 0.1% to 1.6% significantly reduced the flow losses of the cascade (by as much as 57% in some cases). In other test conditions where no evidence depicted flow separation on the blade, there were no measurable effects on the losses due to the increase in freestream turbulence intensity. In addition, the increase of freestream turbulence intensity also improved the effective operating range of the cascade significantly (e.g., by 46% or higher).


2021 ◽  
pp. 0309524X2110550
Author(s):  
Moutaz Elgammi ◽  
Tonio Sant ◽  
Atiyah Abdulmajid Ateeah

Modeling of the flow over aerofoil profiles at low Reynolds numbers is difficult due to the complex physics associated with the laminar flow separation mechanism. Two major problems arise in the estimation of profile drag: (1) the drag force at low Reynolds numbers is extremely small to be measured in a wind tunnel by force balance techniques, (2) the profile drag is usually calculated by pressure integration, hence the skin friction component of drag is excluded. In the present work, three different 4-digit NACA aerofoils are investigated. Measurements are conducted in an open-ended subsonic wind tunnel, while numerical work is performed by time Reynolds-averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) coupled with the laminar-kinetic-energy ( K-kl-w) turbulence model. The influence of the flow separation bubbles and transition locations on the profile drag is discussed and addressed. This paper gives important insights into importance of measurements at low Reynolds numbers for better aerodynamic loads predictions.


2019 ◽  
Vol 870 ◽  
pp. 419-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Agbaglah ◽  
C. Mavriplis

The flow in the near wake of a square cylinder at Reynolds numbers of 205 and 225, corresponding to three-dimensional wake instability modes $A$ and $B$, respectively, and that of the square’s circumscribed circular cylinder are examined by using three-dimensional Navier–Stokes numerical simulations. At small times, prior to the streamwise vortex shedding, a self-similar velocity is observed in the wake and no significant difference is observed in the dynamics of the flows past the square and the circular cylinders. The exponential growth of the three-dimensional instability reaches a saturation regime during this early time for the considered Reynolds numbers. Vortical structures in the wake at long times and shedding frequencies are very close for the square and the circular cylinders. The flow separation on the forward top and bottom corners of the square cylinder have the effect of increasing its effective width, making it comparable with the diameter of the circumscribed circular cylinder. Thus, Floquet multipliers and modes of the associated three-dimensional instabilities are shown to be very close for the two cylinders when using the circumscribed circular cylinder as the basis for a characteristic length scale. Most importantly, the wavenumber with the maximum growth rate, for modes $A$ and $B$, is approximately identical for the two cylinders.


Meccanica ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 1037-1059
Author(s):  
Bo An ◽  
J. M. Bergadà ◽  
F. Mellibovsky ◽  
W. M. Sang ◽  
C. Xi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document