Energy loss of charged projectiles in dusty plasmas

1998 ◽  
Vol 5 (10) ◽  
pp. 3581-3587 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. H. Nasim ◽  
Arshad M. Mirza ◽  
M. S. Qaisar ◽  
G. Murtaza ◽  
P. K. Shukla
Keyword(s):  
Energy Loss ◽  
Dusty Plasmas

Energy Loss of a Test Charge in Dusty Plasmas: Collective and Individual Particle Contributions

1999 ◽  
Vol 59 (5) ◽  
pp. 379-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
M H Nasim ◽  
Arshad M Mirza ◽  
G Murtaza ◽  
P K Shukla
Keyword(s):  
Energy Loss ◽  
Dusty Plasmas ◽  
Individual Particle ◽  
Test Charge

Energy Loss of a Test Charge in Collisional Dusty Plasmas

2000 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. 628-634 ◽  
Author(s):  
M H Nasim ◽  
Arshad M Mirza ◽  
G Murtaza ◽  
P K Shukla
Keyword(s):  
Energy Loss ◽  
Dusty Plasmas ◽  
Test Charge

Energy loss of a test charge in partially ionized dusty plasmas

2000 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 762-765 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. H. Nasim ◽  
M. S. Qaisar ◽  
Arshad M. Mirza ◽  
G. Murtaza ◽  
P. K. Shukla
Keyword(s):  
Energy Loss ◽  
Dusty Plasmas ◽  
Test Charge ◽  
Partially Ionized

Inelastic Electron-Matter Interactions

1978 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 259-267
Author(s):  
J. Silcox
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscope ◽  
Energy Loss ◽  
Chemical Structure ◽  
Inelastic Electron ◽  
Primary Concern ◽  
Unique Probe ◽  
Introductory Paper ◽  
Elastic Processes ◽  
Experimental Level ◽  
Inelastic Processes

In this introductory paper, my primary concern will be in identifying and outlining the various types of inelastic processes resulting from the interaction of electrons with matter. Elastic processes are understood reasonably well at the present experimental level and can be regarded as giving information on spatial arrangements. We need not consider them here. Inelastic processes do contain information of considerable value which reflect the electronic and chemical structure of the sample. In combination with the spatial resolution of the electron microscope, a unique probe of materials is finally emerging (Hillier 1943, Watanabe 1955, Castaing and Henri 1962, Crewe 1966, Wittry, Ferrier and Cosslett 1969, Isaacson and Johnson 1975, Egerton, Rossouw and Whelan 1976, Kokubo and Iwatsuki 1976, Colliex, Cosslett, Leapman and Trebbia 1977). We first review some scattering terminology by way of background and to identify some of the more interesting and significant features of energy loss electrons and then go on to discuss examples of studies of the type of phenomena encountered. Finally we will comment on some of the experimental factors encountered.

Data Acquisition and Handling Unit for a Quantitative Use of Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy

1977 ◽  
Vol 35 ◽  
pp. 232-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Trebbia ◽  
P. Ballongue ◽  
C. Colliex
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscope ◽  
Energy Loss ◽  
Electron Energy ◽  
Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy ◽  
Single Channel ◽  
Detection System ◽  
Surface Barrier ◽  
Solid State Detector ◽  
Electrostatic Mirror ◽  
Electron Energy Loss

An effective use of electron energy loss spectroscopy for chemical characterization of selected areas in the electron microscope can only be achieved with the development of quantitative measurements capabilities.The experimental assembly, which is sketched in Fig.l, has therefore been carried out. It comprises four main elements.The analytical transmission electron microscope is a conventional microscope fitted with a Castaing and Henry dispersive unit (magnetic prism and electrostatic mirror). Recent modifications include the improvement of the vacuum in the specimen chamber (below 10-6 torr) and the adaptation of a new electrostatic mirror.The detection system, similar to the one described by Hermann et al (1), is located in a separate chamber below the fluorescent screen which visualizes the energy loss spectrum. Variable apertures select the electrons, which have lost an energy AE within an energy window smaller than 1 eV, in front of a surface barrier solid state detector RTC BPY 52 100 S.Q. The saw tooth signal delivered by a charge sensitive preamplifier (decay time of 5.10-5 S) is amplified, shaped into a gaussian profile through an active filter and counted by a single channel analyser.

Trends in Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy

1977 ◽  
Vol 35 ◽  
pp. 228-229
Author(s):  
C. Colliex ◽  
P. Trebbia
Keyword(s):  
Energy Loss ◽  
Electron Energy ◽  
Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy ◽  
Materials Science ◽  
Analytical Technique ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
Quantitative Results ◽  
Electron Microscopes ◽  
Electron Energy Loss ◽  
Primary Electrons

The physical foundations for the use of electron energy loss spectroscopy towards analytical purposes, seem now rather well established and have been extensively discussed through recent publications. In this brief review we intend only to mention most recent developments in this field, which became available to our knowledge. We derive also some lines of discussion to define more clearly the limits of this analytical technique in materials science problems.The spectral information carried in both low ( 0<ΔE<100eV ) and high ( >100eV ) energy regions of the loss spectrum, is capable to provide quantitative results. Spectrometers have therefore been designed to work with all kinds of electron microscopes and to cover large energy ranges for the detection of inelastically scattered electrons (for instance the L-edge of molybdenum at 2500eV has been measured by van Zuylen with primary electrons of 80 kV). It is rather easy to fix a post-specimen magnetic optics on a STEM, but Crewe has recently underlined that great care should be devoted to optimize the collecting power and the energy resolution of the whole system.

Scattering-angle dependence of signal/background ratio of inner-shell electron excitation loss in EELS

1983 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
pp. 390-391
Author(s):  
T. Oikawa ◽  
M. Inoue ◽  
T. Honda ◽  
Y. Kokubo
Keyword(s):  
Energy Loss ◽  
Electron Excitation ◽  
Heavy Elements ◽  
Background Intensity ◽  
Light Elements ◽  
Energy Analyzer ◽  
High Background ◽  
Scattering Angle ◽  
Angle Dependence ◽  
Shell Electron

EELS allows us to make analysis of light elements such as hydrogen to heavy elements of microareas on the specimen. In energy loss spectra, however, elemental signals ride on a high background; therefore, the signal/background (S/B) ratio is very low in EELS. A technique which collects the center beam axial-symmetrically in the scattering angle is generally used to obtain high total intensity. However, the technique collects high background intensity together with elemental signals; therefore, the technique does not improve the S/B ratio. This report presents the experimental results of the S/B ratio measured as a function of the scattering angle and shows the possibility of the S/B ratio being improved in the high scattering angle range.Energy loss spectra have been measured using a JEM-200CX TEM with an energy analyzer ASEA3 at 200 kV.Fig.l shows a typical K-shell electron excitation edge riding on background in an energy loss spectrum.

Signal/Noise Ratio and Elemental Detectivity by Eels

1982 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. 488-489
Author(s):  
R. F. Egerton
Keyword(s):  
Energy Loss ◽  
Electron Energy ◽  
Elemental Analysis ◽  
Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy ◽  
Emission Spectroscopy ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Signal Noise ◽  
Characteristic Signal ◽  
Noise Ratio ◽  
Electron Energy Loss

An important parameter governing the sensitivity and accuracy of elemental analysis by electron energy-loss spectroscopy (EELS) or by X-ray emission spectroscopy is the signal/noise ratio of the characteristic signal.

Background subtraction in STEM energy-loss mapping

1984 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. 568-569
Author(s):  
R.D. Leapman ◽  
K.E. Gorlen ◽  
C.R. Swyt
Keyword(s):  
Energy Loss ◽  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
Statistical Error ◽  
Scanning Transmission Electron Microscope ◽  
Reference Image ◽  
Inverse Power Law ◽  
Transmission Electron ◽  
Least Squares Fit ◽  
Scanning Transmission ◽  
Single Number

The determination of elemental distributions by electron energy loss spectroscopy necessitates removal of the non-characteristic spectral background from a core-edge at each point in the image. In the scanning transmission electron microscope this is made possible by computer controlled data acquisition. Data may be processed by fitting the pre-edge counts, at two or more channels, to an inverse power law, AE-r, where A and r are parameters and E is energy loss. Processing may be performed in real-time so a single number is saved at each pixel. Detailed analysis, shows that the largest contribution to noise comes from statistical error in the least squares fit to the background. If the background shape remains constant over the entire image, the signal-to-noise ratio can be improved by fitting only one parameter. Such an assumption is generally implicit in subtraction of the “reference image” in energy selected micrographs recorded in the CTEM with a Castaing-Henry spectrometer.

Quantitative Electron Energy Loss Mapping

1985 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
pp. 404-405
Author(s):  
R.D. Leapman ◽  
C.R. Swyt
Keyword(s):  
Energy Loss ◽  
Electron Energy ◽  
Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy ◽  
Elemental Concentration ◽  
Core Loss ◽  
Elemental Distribution ◽  
Electron Energy Loss

The intensity of a characteristic electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) image does not, in general, directly reflect the elemental concentration. In fact, the raw core loss image can give a misleading impression of the elemental distribution. This is because the measured core edge signal depends on the amount of plural scattering which can vary significantly from region to region in a sample. Here, we show how the method for quantifying spectra due to Egerton et al. can be extended to maps.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document