On the large eddy simulation of a turbulent channel flow with significant heat transfer

1996 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 3354-3366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen‐Ping Wang ◽  
Richard H. Pletcher
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Channel Flow ◽  
Turbulent Channel Flow ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy

scholarly journals Predictions of Conjugate Heat Transfer in Turbulent Channel Flow using Advanced Wall-Modeled Large Eddy Simulation Techniques

Entropy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 725
Author(s):  
Yongxiang Li ◽  
Florian Ries ◽  
Kaushal Nishad ◽  
Amsini Sadiki
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Large Eddy Simulation ◽  
Channel Flow ◽  
Entropy Generation ◽  
Transfer Process ◽  
Conjugate Heat Transfer ◽  
Turbulent Channel Flow ◽  
Eddy Simulation ◽  
Large Eddy ◽  
Solid Region

In this paper, advanced wall-modeled large eddy simulation (LES) techniques are used to predict conjugate heat transfer processes in turbulent channel flow. Thereby, the thermal energy transfer process involves an interaction of conduction within a solid body and convection from the solid surface by fluid motion. The approaches comprise a two-layer RANS–LES approach (zonal LES), a hybrid RANS–LES representative, the so-called improved delayed detached eddy simulation method (IDDES) and a non-equilibrium wall function model (WFLES), respectively. The results obtained are evaluated in comparison with direct numerical simulation (DNS) data and wall-resolved LES including thermal cases of large Reynolds numbers where DNS data are not available in the literature. It turns out that zonal LES, IDDES and WFLES are able to predict heat and fluid flow statistics along with wall shear stresses and Nusselt numbers accurately and that are physically consistent. Furthermore, it is found that IDDES, WFLES and zonal LES exhibit significantly lower computational costs than wall-resolved LES. Since IDDES and especially zonal LES require considerable extra work to generate numerical grids, this study indicates in particular that WFLES offers a promising near-wall modeling strategy for LES of conjugated heat transfer problems. Finally, an entropy generation analysis using the various models showed that the viscous entropy production is zero inside the solid region, peaks at the solid–fluid interface and decreases rapidly with increasing wall distance within the fluid region. Except inside the solid region, where steep temperature gradients lead to high (thermal) entropy generation rates, a similar behavior is monitored for the entropy generation by heat transfer process.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document