Gamow states as continuous linear functionals over analytical test functions

1996 ◽  
Vol 37 (9) ◽  
pp. 4235-4242 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. G. Bollini ◽  
O. Civitarese ◽  
A. L. De Paoli ◽  
M. C. Rocca
1992 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-188
Author(s):  
Neill Robertson

By the term “locally convex space”, we mean a locally convex Hausdorff topological vector space (see [17]). We shall denote the algebraic dual of a locally convex space E by E*, and its topological dual by E′. It is convenient to think of the elements of E as being linear functionals on E′, so that E can be identified with a subspace of E′*. The adjoint of a continuous linear map T:E→F will be denoted by T′:F′→E′. If 〈E, F〈 is a dual pair of vector spaces, then we shall denote the corresponding weak, strong and Mackey topologies on E by α(E, F), β(E, F) and μ(E, F) respectively.


2002 ◽  
Vol 165 ◽  
pp. 91-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murali Rao ◽  
Zoran Vondraćek

We introduce a framework for a nonlinear potential theory without a kernel on a reflexive, strictly convex and smooth Banach space of functions. Nonlinear potentials are defined as images of nonnegative continuous linear functionals on that space under the duality mapping. We study potentials and reduced functions by using a variant of the Gauss-Frostman quadratic functional. The framework allows a development of other main concepts of nonlinear potential theory such as capacities, equilibrium potentials and measures of finite energy.


1974 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. S. Macphail ◽  
A. Wilansky

The purpose of this paper is to continue the study of certain “distinguished” subsets of the convergence domain of a matrix, as developed by A. Wilansky [6] and G. Bennett [1], We also consider continuous linear functionals on the domain, and the extent to which their representation is unique; this turns out to be connected with the behaviour of the subsets.


1970 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 431-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A. Dyer

The purpose of this paper is to consider a representation for the elements of a linear topological space in the form of a σ-integral over a linearly ordered subset of V; this ordered subset is what will be called an L basis. The formal definition of an L basis is essentially an abstraction from ideas used, often tacitly, in proofs of many of the theorems concerning integral representations for continuous linear functionals on function spaces.The L basis constructed in this paper differs in several basic ways from the integral basis considered by Edwards in [5]. Since the integrals used here are of Hellinger type rather than Radon type one has in the approximating sums for the integral an immediate and natural analogue to the partial sum operators of summation basis theory.


1970 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 709-718
Author(s):  
A. T. Whipp

AbstractIn order to study the convergence of a series arising from the use of Martin's method in potential scattering a framework consisting of a modifidation to Schwartz's formulation of distribution theory is set up. This modification makes essential use of norms on the spaces of test functions and linear functionals. By making the norm on the space of test functions satisfy extra axioms a bound is obtained on the norm of a generalized convolution of two linear functionals, and this bound is used to prove the convergence of the series. The proof of convergence is generalized to cover the multi-channel problem. The method used may also be applied to many other physical problems.


Author(s):  
I. J. Maddox

If (X, g) is a paranormed space, with paranorm g (see (2)), then we denote by X* the continuous dual of X, i.e. the set of all continuous linear functionals on X. If E is a set of complex sequences x = (xk) then E† will denote the generalized Köthe–Toeplitz dual of E


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document