Partitioning ‘‘opposite’’ bounds for potential scattering phase shifts

1983 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 588-589
Author(s):  
M. A. Abdel‐Raouf
Keyword(s):  
Phase Shifts ◽  
Potential Scattering ◽  
Scattering Phase ◽  
Scattering Phase Shifts

Low Energy n–16O Elastic Scattering Phase Shifts Derived from the Sussex Interaction

1975 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 203-206
Author(s):  
M. Betz ◽  
J. P. Jeukenne ◽  
A. Lejeune
Keyword(s):  
Elastic Scattering ◽  
Body Force ◽  
Phase Shifts ◽  
Potential Scattering ◽  
Hartree Fock ◽  
Consistent Field ◽  
Self Consistent Field ◽  
Scattering Phase ◽  
Scattering Phase Shifts

The properties of the Sussex interaction are tested in the study of the n–16O elastic scattering described by the potential scattering in the Hartree–Fock field. This force leads to an easy determination of the self-consistent field, but gives s1/2 and d3/2 phase shifts which are not very satisfactory. This results from the important gap separating bound and unbound states. Further, some uncertainty in the calculation arises from approximations necessary in order to obtain some nondiagonal matrix elements of the two body force which are necessary in the determination of the phase shifts.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document