scholarly journals Thermal conductivity of two-dimensional disordered fibrous materials defined by interfiber thermal contact conductance and intrinsic conductivity of fibers

2020 ◽  
Vol 127 (6) ◽  
pp. 065102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexey N. Volkov ◽  
Leonid V. Zhigilei
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Conductivity ◽  
Thermal Contact ◽  
Thermal Contact Conductance ◽  
Two Dimensional ◽  
Fibrous Materials ◽  
Contact Conductance ◽  
Intrinsic Conductivity

Anisotropic Heat Conduction Effects in Proton-Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells

2006 ◽  
Vol 129 (9) ◽  
pp. 1109-1118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaitanya J. Bapat ◽  
Stefan T. Thynell
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Conductivity ◽  
Temperature Distribution ◽  
Thermal Contact ◽  
Current Collector ◽  
Gas Diffusion ◽  
Thermal Contact Conductance ◽  
Contact Conductance ◽  
Gas Diffusion Layers ◽  
Diffusion Layers ◽  
Anisotropic Thermal Conductivity

The focus of this work is to study the effects of anisotropic thermal conductivity and thermal contact conductance on the overall temperature distribution inside a fuel cell. The gas-diffusion layers and membrane are expected to possess an anisotropic thermal conductivity, whereas a contact resistance is present between the current collectors and gas-diffusion layers. A two-dimensional single phase model is used to capture transport phenomena inside the cell. From the use of this model, it is predicted that the maximum temperatures inside the cell can be appreciably higher than the operating temperature of the cell. A high value of the in-plane thermal conductivity for the gas-diffusion layers was seen to be essential for achieving smaller temperature gradients. However, the maximum improvement in the heat transfer characteristics of the fuel cell brought about by increasing the in-plane thermal conductivity is limited by the presence of a finite thermal contact conductance at the diffusion layer/current collector interface. This was determined to be even more important for thin gas-diffusion layers. Anisotropic thermal conductivity of the membrane, however, did not have a significant impact on the temperature distribution. The thermal contact conductance at the diffusion layer/current collector interface strongly affected the temperature distribution inside the cell.

Sodium Silicate Based Thermal Interface Material for High Thermal Contact Conductance

1999 ◽  
Vol 122 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunsheng Xu ◽  
Xiangcheng Luo ◽  
D. D. L. Chung
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Conductivity ◽  
Boron Nitride ◽  
Sodium Silicate ◽  
Hexagonal Boron Nitride ◽  
Thermal Contact ◽  
Mineral Oil ◽  
Thermal Interface Material ◽  
Thermal Contact Conductance ◽  
Thermal Interface ◽  
Contact Conductance

Sodium silicate based thermal interface pastes give higher thermal contact conductance across conductor surfaces than polymer based pastes and oils, due to their higher fluidity and the consequent greater conformability. Addition of hexagonal boron nitride particles up to 16.0 vol. percent further increases the conductance of sodium silicate, due to the higher thermal conductivity of BN. However, addition beyond 16.0 vol. percent BN causes the conductance to decrease, due to the decrease in fluidity. At 16.0 vol. percent BN, the conductance is up to 63 percent higher than those given by silicone based pastes and is almost as high as that given by solder. Water is almost as effective as sodium silicate without filler, but the thermal contact conductance decreases with time due to the evaporation of water. Mineral oil and silicone without filler are much less effective than water or sodium silicate without filler. [S1043-7398(00)00402-3]

Measurement of the Thermal Contact Conductance and Thermal Conductivity of Anodized Aluminum Coatings

1990 ◽  
Vol 112 (3) ◽  
pp. 579-585 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. P. Peterson ◽  
L. S. Fletcher
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Thermal Conductivity ◽  
Effective Thermal Conductivity ◽  
Coating Thickness ◽  
Thermal Contact ◽  
Thermal Contact Conductance ◽  
Aluminum Surface ◽  
Anodized Aluminum ◽  
Contact Conductance ◽  
Surface Measurements

An experimental investigation was conducted to determine the thermal contact conductance and effective thermal conductivity of anodized coatings. One chemically polished Aluminum 6061-T6 test specimen and seven specimens with anodized coatings varying in thickness from 60.9 μm to 163.8 μm were tested while in contact with a single unanodized aluminum surface. Measurements of the overall joint conductance, composed of the thermal contact conductance between the anodized coating and the bare aluminum surface and the bulk conductance of the coating material, indicated that the overall joint conductance decreased with increasing thickness of the anodized coating and increased with increasing interfacial load. Using the experimental data, a dimensionless expression was developed that related the overall joint conductance to the coating thickness, the surface roughness, the interfacial pressure, and the properties of the aluminum substrate. By subtracting the thermal contact conductance from the measured overall joint conductance, estimations of the effective thermal conductivity of the anodized coating as a function of pressure were obtained for each of the seven anodized specimens. At an extrapolated pressure of zero, the effective thermal conductivity was found to be approximately 0.02 W/m-K. In addition to this extrapolated value, a single expression for predicting the effective thermal conductivity as a function of both the interface pressure and the anodized coating thickness was developed and shown to be within ±5 percent of the experimental data over a pressure range of 0 to 14 MPa.

Influence of Contact Pressure on the Thermal Contact Conductance of Layered AA3003 Aluminium

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Thermal Conductivity ◽  
Contact Pressure ◽  
Thermal Contact ◽  
Thermal Conductance ◽  
Thermal Contact Conductance ◽  
Contact Conductance ◽  
Interface Thermal Resistance ◽  
Measurement Results ◽  
Semi Empirical ◽  
The Relationship

For the optimization of the annealing process of aluminium coils, simulation of the process is often performed. To simulate the process with higher accuracy, reliable input parameters are required and the thermal conductivity (thermal contact conductance) is one of them. In the present study, the thermal conductivity and thermal contact conductance of AA3003 alloy sheets were measured by a steady state comparative longitudinal heat flow method at different contact pressure. To evaluate the thermal conductance at the interface, thermal resistance network model' was applied. In addition, the surface roughness of the sheets was also investigated. Based on the measurement results, the semi-empirical equation for the relationship between thermal contact conductance and contact pressure was obtained

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document