scholarly journals SEMG-based multifeatures and predictive model for knee-joint-angle estimation

AIP Advances ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 095042 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Yang ◽  
Xugang Xi ◽  
Sijia Chen ◽  
Seyed M. Miran ◽  
Xian Hua ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knee Joint ◽  
Predictive Model ◽  
Joint Angle ◽  
Angle Estimation ◽  
Knee Joint Angle

Effects of IMU Sensor-to-Segment Misalignment and Orientation Error on 3D Knee Joint Angle Estimation

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Bingfei Fan ◽  
Qingguo Li ◽  
Tian Tan ◽  
Peiqi Kang ◽  
Peter B. Shull
Keyword(s):  
Knee Joint ◽  
Joint Angle ◽  
Orientation Error ◽  
Angle Estimation ◽  
Knee Joint Angle

Accuracy Verification of Knee Joint Angle Estimation During Walking Using Small and Lightweight IMU

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (0) ◽  
pp. 1P2-L07
Author(s):  
Wataru HAYASAKA ◽  
Kiyoshi TSURUMIYA ◽  
Yu IGARASHI ◽  
Akira KOMATSU ◽  
Takehiro IWAMI
Keyword(s):  
Knee Joint ◽  
Joint Angle ◽  
Angle Estimation ◽  
Knee Joint Angle

Knee joint angle estimation during gait cycle using low-cost inertial sensors

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Sanchez-Guzman ◽  
J. F. Guerrero-Castellanos ◽  
G. Mino-Aguilar ◽  
R. C. Ambrosio-Lazaro ◽  
J. Linares-Flores
Keyword(s):  
Knee Joint ◽  
Gait Cycle ◽  
Joint Angle ◽  
Inertial Sensors ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Angle Estimation ◽  
Knee Joint Angle

scholarly journals Simulation of Knee Joint Angle Estimation from EMG Signal for Post ACL Reconstruction Surgical Rehabilitation

2021 ◽  
Vol 1805 (1) ◽  
pp. 012019
Author(s):  
Y M Zuchruf ◽  
T Asmaria ◽  
R Rulaningtyas ◽  
A Rahmatillah ◽  
I Kartika ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knee Joint ◽  
Acl Reconstruction ◽  
Joint Angle ◽  
Angle Estimation ◽  
Knee Joint Angle ◽  
Emg Signal

scholarly journals Continuous Estimation of Knee Joint Angle Based on Surface Electromyography Using a Long Short-Term Memory Neural Network and Time-Advanced Feature

Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (17) ◽  
pp. 4966
Author(s):  
Xunju Ma ◽  
Yali Liu ◽  
Qiuzhi Song ◽  
Can Wang
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Knee Joint ◽  
Surface Electromyography ◽  
Joint Angle ◽  
Short Term Memory ◽  
Mean Square ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Term Memory ◽  
Knee Joint Angle ◽  
Long Short Term Memory

Continuous joint angle estimation based on a surface electromyography (sEMG) signal can be used to improve the man-machine coordination performance of the exoskeleton. In this study, we proposed a time-advanced feature and utilized long short-term memory (LSTM) with a root mean square (RMS) feature and its time-advanced feature (RMSTAF; collectively referred to as RRTAF) of sEMG to estimate the knee joint angle. To evaluate the effect of joint angle estimation, we used root mean square error (RMSE) and cross-correlation coefficient ρ between the estimated angle and actual angle. We also compared three methods (i.e., LSTM using RMS, BPNN (back propagation neural network) using RRTAF, and BPNN using RMS) with LSTM using RRTAF to highlight its good performance. Five healthy subjects participated in the experiment and their eight muscle (i.e., rectus femoris (RF), biceps femoris (BF), semitendinosus (ST), gracilis (GC), semimembranosus (SM), sartorius (SR), medial gastrocnemius (MG), and tibialis anterior (TA)) sEMG signals were taken as algorithm inputs. Moreover, the knee joint angles were used as target values. The experimental results showed that, compared with LSTM using RMS, BPNN using RRTAF, and BPNN using RMS, the average RMSE values of LSTM using RRTAF were respectively reduced by 8.57%, 46.62%, and 68.69%, whereas the average ρ values were respectively increased by 0.31%, 4.15%, and 18.35%. The results demonstrated that LSTM using RRTAF, which contained the time-advanced feature, had better performance for estimating the knee joint motion.

scholarly journals Evaluating the use of machine learning in the assessment of joint angle using a single inertial sensor

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 205566831986854 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rob Argent ◽  
Sean Drummond ◽  
Alexandria Remus ◽  
Martin O’Reilly ◽  
Brian Caulfield
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Knee Joint ◽  
Inertial Measurement Unit ◽  
Joint Angle ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Measurement Unit ◽  
Reference Standard ◽  
Inertial Measurement ◽  
Knee Joint Angle ◽  
Single Sensor

Introduction Joint angle measurement is an important objective marker in rehabilitation. Inertial measurement units may provide an accurate and reliable method of joint angle assessment. The objective of this study was to assess whether a single sensor with the application of machine learning algorithms could accurately measure hip and knee joint angle, and investigate the effect of inertial measurement unit orientation algorithms and person-specific variables on accuracy. Methods Fourteen healthy participants completed eight rehabilitation exercises with kinematic data captured by a 3D motion capture system, used as the reference standard, and a wearable inertial measurement unit. Joint angle was calculated from the single inertial measurement unit using four machine learning models, and was compared to the reference standard to evaluate accuracy. Results Average root-mean-squared error for the best performing algorithms across all exercises was 4.81° (SD = 1.89). The use of an inertial measurement unit orientation algorithm as a pre-processing step improved accuracy; however, the addition of person-specific variables increased error with average RMSE 4.99° (SD = 1.83°). Conclusions Hip and knee joint angle can be measured with a good degree of accuracy from a single inertial measurement unit using machine learning. This offers the ability to monitor and record dynamic joint angle with a single sensor outside of the clinic.

BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF THE STANDING LONG JUMP

2003 ◽  
Vol 15 (05) ◽  
pp. 186-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
WEN-LAN WU ◽  
JIA-HROUNG WU ◽  
HWAI-TING LIN ◽  
GWO-JAW WANG
Keyword(s):  
Knee Joint ◽  
Motion Analysis ◽  
Joint Angle ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
The Body ◽  
Initial Angle ◽  
Knee Joint Angle ◽  
Standing Long Jump ◽  
Long Jump ◽  
Arm Motion

The purposes of the present study were to (1) investigate the effects of the arm movement and initial knee joint angle employed in standing long jump by the ground reaction force analysis and three-dimensional motion analysis; and (2) investigate how the jump performance of the female gender related to the body configuration. Thirty-four healthy adult females performed standing long jump on a force platform with full effort. Body segment and joint angles were analyzed by three-dimensional motion analysis system. Using kinetic and kinematic data, the trajectories on mass center of body, knee joint angle, magnitude of peak takeoff force, and impulse generation in preparing phase were calculated. Average standing long jump performances with free arm motion were +1.5 times above performance with restricted arm motion in both knee initial angles. The performances with knee 90° initial flexion were +1.2 times above performance with knee 45° initial flexion in free and restricted arm motions. Judging by trajectories of the center mass of body (COM), free arm motion improves jump distance by anterior displacement of the COM in starting position. The takeoff velocity with 90° knee initial angle was as much as 11% higher than in with 45° knee initial angle. However, the takeoff angles on the COM trajectory showed no significant differences between each other. It was found that starting jump from 90° bend knee relatively extended the time that the force is applied by the leg muscles. To compare the body configurations and the jumping scores, there were no significant correlations between jump scores and anthropometry data. The greater muscle mass or longer leg did not correlated well with the superior jumping performance.

scholarly journals Human muscle length-dependent changes in blood flow

2012 ◽  
Vol 112 (4) ◽  
pp. 560-565 ◽  
Author(s):  
John McDaniel ◽  
Stephen J. Ives ◽  
Russell S. Richardson
Keyword(s):  
Blood Flow ◽  
Knee Joint ◽  
Joint Angle ◽  
Muscle Blood Flow ◽  
Muscle Length ◽  
Limb Blood Flow ◽  
Knee Joint Angle ◽  
Femoral Blood Flow ◽  
Femoral Blood ◽  
Cyclic Changes

Although a multitude of factors that influence skeletal muscle blood flow have been extensively investigated, the influence of muscle length on limb blood flow has received little attention. Thus the purpose of this investigation was to determine if cyclic changes in muscle length influence resting blood flow. Nine healthy men (28 ± 4 yr of age) underwent a passive knee extension protocol during which the subjects' knee joint was passively extended and flexed through 100–180° knee joint angle at a rate of 1 cycle per 30 s. Femoral blood flow, cardiac output (CO), heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were continuously recorded during the entire protocol. These measurements revealed that slow passive changes in knee joint angle did not have a significant influence on HR, SV, MAP, or CO; however, net femoral blood flow demonstrated a curvilinear increase with knee joint angle ( r2 = 0.98) such that blood flow increased by ∼90% (125 ml/min) across the 80° range of motion. This net change in blood flow was due to a constant antegrade blood flow across knee joint angle and negative relationship between retrograde blood flow and knee joint angle ( r2 = 0.98). Thus, despite the absence of central hemodynamic changes and local metabolic factors, blood flow to the leg was altered by changes in muscle length. Therefore, when designing research protocols, researchers need to be cognizant of the fact that joint angle, and ultimately muscle length, influence limb blood flow.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document