scholarly journals Mean-value at risk portfolio selection problem using clustering technique : A case study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheshma Kiran Kumari ◽  
P. Kumar ◽  
J. Priya ◽  
S. Surya ◽  
A. K. Bhurjee
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Portfolio Selection ◽  
Value At Risk ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Selection Problem ◽  
Portfolio Selection Problem ◽  
Clustering Technique

scholarly journals Formulation of the Non-Parametric Value at Risk Portfolio Selection Problem Considering Symmetry

Symmetry ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 1639
Author(s):  
Dazhi Wang ◽  
Yanhua Chen ◽  
Hongfeng Wang ◽  
Min Huang
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Portfolio Selection ◽  
Value At Risk ◽  
Computation Time ◽  
Pso Algorithm ◽  
Selection Problem ◽  
Mixed Integer ◽  
Optimal Solutions ◽  
Portfolio Selection Problem ◽  
Non Parametric

In this research, we study the non-parametric portfolio selection problem with Value at Risk (VaR) minimization and establish a new enhanced Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) formulation to obtain the optimal solutions considering the symmetric property of VaR. We identify that the new MILP formulation can significantly reduce the computation burden of the MILP solver CPLEX. To solve larger-scale practical portfolio selection problems in reasonable computation time, we also develop the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm integrating an efficient Fast Feasible Solution Detection (FFSD) scheme to obtain the near-optimal solutions. Using the simulated datasets with different distribution parameters and skewness and kurtosis patterns, some preliminary numerical results are provided to show the efficiency of the new formulation and FFSD scheme.

scholarly journals Multi-stage stochastic model in portfolio selection problem

Filomat ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 991-1001
Author(s):  
Shokoofeh Banihashemi ◽  
Ali Azarpour ◽  
Marziye Kaveh
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Portfolio Selection ◽  
Value At Risk ◽  
Risk Measures ◽  
Risk Measure ◽  
Selection Problem ◽  
Conditional Value At Risk ◽  
Expected Return ◽  
Portfolio Selection Problem ◽  
Multi Stage

This paper is a novel work of portfolio-selection problem solving using multi objective model considering four parameters, Expected return, downside beta coefficient, semivariance and conditional value at risk at a specified confidence level. Multi-period models can be defined as stochastic models. Early studies on portfolio selection developed using variance as a risk measure; although, theories and practices revealed that variance, considering its downsides, is not a desirable risk measure. To increase accuracy and overcoming negative aspects of variance, downside risk measures like semivarinace, downside beta covariance, value at risk and conditional value at risk was other risk measures that replaced in models. These risk measures all have advantages over variance and previous works using these parameters have shown improvements in the best portfolio selection. Purposed models are solved using genetic algorithm and for the topic completion, numerical example and plots to measure the performance of model in four dimensions are provided.

A novel probabilistic hesitant fuzzy portfolio selection model with value-at-risk and safety level of score

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xue Deng ◽  
Weimin Li
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Portfolio Selection ◽  
Value At Risk ◽  
Selection Model ◽  
Selection Models ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Fuzzy Portfolio Selection ◽  
Fuzzy Environment ◽  
Portfolio Selection Model

Purpose This paper aims to propose two portfolio selection models with hesitant value-at-risk (HVaR) – HVaR fuzzy portfolio selection model (HVaR-FPSM) and HVaR-score fuzzy portfolio selection model (HVaR-S-FPSM) – to help investors solve the problem that how bad a portfolio can be under probabilistic hesitant fuzzy environment. Design/methodology/approach It is strictly proved that the higher the probability threshold, the higher the HVaR in HVaR-S-FPSM. Numerical examples and a case study are used to illustrate the steps of building the proposed models and the importance of the HVaR and score constraint. In case study, the authors conduct a sensitivity analysis and compare the proposed models with decision-making models and hesitant fuzzy portfolio models. Findings The score constraint can make sure that the portfolio selected is profitable, but will not cause the HVaR to decrease dramatically. The investment proportions of stocks are mainly affected by their HVaRs, which is consistent with the fact that the stock having good performance is usually desirable in portfolio selection. The HVaR-S-FPSM can find portfolios with higher HVaR than each single stock and has little sacrifice of extreme returns. Originality/value This paper fulfills a need to construct portfolio selection models with HVaR under probabilistic hesitant fuzzy environment. As a downside risk, the HVaR is more consistent with investors’ intuitions about risks. Moreover, the score constraint makes sure that undesirable portfolios will not be selected.

A DOWNSIDE RISK APPROACH FOR THE PORTFOLIO SELECTION PROBLEM WITH FUZZY RETURNS

2004 ◽  
Vol 09 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa León ◽  
Vicente Liern ◽  
Paulina Marco ◽  
Enriqueta Vercher ◽  
José Vicente Segura
Keyword(s):  
Portfolio Selection ◽  
Downside Risk ◽  
Selection Problem ◽  
Portfolio Selection Problem ◽  
Risk Approach
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document