scholarly journals Fast magnetic resonance imaging based on high degree total variation

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sujie Wang ◽  
Liangliang Lu ◽  
Junbao Zheng ◽  
Mingfeng Jiang
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Total Variation ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
High Degree ◽  
Fast Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Fast magnetic resonance imaging of intracerebral metastatic disease

1988 ◽  
Vol 61 (731) ◽  
pp. 1002-1008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael P. Williams ◽  
Graham R. Cherryman ◽  
Janet E. Husband ◽  
Christine W. Heron
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Fast Magnetic Resonance Imaging

scholarly journals Sensitivity of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Detection of Colorectal Liver Metastases

2008 ◽  
Vol 90 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Blyth ◽  
A Blakeborough ◽  
M Peterson ◽  
IC Cameron ◽  
AW Majeed
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Colorectal Liver Metastases ◽  
Imaging Modality ◽  
Invasive Technique ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Mri Scans ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Mri ◽  
High Degree

INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of colorectal liver metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS Pre-operative MRI scanning of the liver was performed by a single radiologist and the size and number of definite liver metastases were recorded. Patients then underwent hepatectomy with routine intra-operative ultrasonography (IOUS) and resected specimens were sent for histopathology. Pathology findings were compared with those of MRI scans to determine the sensitivity of this imaging modality. Exclusions were patients undergoing hepatic resection more than 4 weeks after the MRI scan, those undergoing chemotherapy at the time of the scan, and those with conglomerate unilobar metastases. RESULTS Complete data were available for 84 patients. There was total agreement between MRI, IOUS and histology in 79 patients (101 metastases). MRI missed 5 metastases in 5 patients that were found on IOUS (or palpation of superficial lesions) and subsequently confirmed by histological examination. These measured 5 mm or less (4 patients) and 7 mm (one patient). The sensitivity of MRI in the detection of colorectal liver metastases was thus 94% for all lesions and 100% for lesions 1 cm or larger in diameter. CONCLUSIONS MRI of the liver is a non-invasive technique with an extremely high degree of sensitivity in the detection of colorectal liver metastases and should be considered as the ‘gold standard’ in the pre-operative imaging of these patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document