scholarly journals Analysis of gravity data beneath Endut geothermal prospect using horizontal gradient and Euler deconvolution

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Supriyanto ◽  
T. Noor ◽  
E. Suhanto
Geophysics ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 58 (11) ◽  
pp. 1588-1595 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Marson ◽  
E. E. Klingele

Gravity gradiometric data or gravity data transformed into vertical gradient can be efficiently processed in three dimensions for delineating density discontinuities. Model studies, performed with the combined use of maxima of analytic signal and of horizontal gradient and the Euler deconvolution techniques on the gravity field and its vertical gradient, demonstrate the superiority of the latter in locating density contrasts. Particularly in the case of interfering anomalies, where the use of gravity alone fails, the gravity gradient is able to provide useful information with satisfactory accuracy.


Geophysics ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 1018-1028 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dwain K. Butler

Gravity gradient profiles across subsurface structures that are approximately 2-D contain diagnostic information regarding depth, size, and structure (geometry). Gradient space plots, i.e., plots of horizontal gradient versus vertical gradient, present the complete magnitude and phase information in the gradient profiles simultaneously. Considerable previous work demonstrates the possibility for complete structural interpretation of a truncated plate model from the gradient space plot. The qualitative and quantitative diagnostic information contained in gradient space plots is general, however. Examination of the characteristics of gradient space plots reveals that 2-D structures are readily classified as extended or localized. For example, the truncated plate model is an extended model, while the faulted plate model is a localized model. Comparison of measured or calculated gradient space plots to a model gradient space plot catalog allows a rapid, qualitative determination of structure or geometry. “Corners” of a polygonal cross‐section model are then determined as profile points corresponding to maxima on the vertical gradient profile. A generalized approach to structural interpretation from gravity data consists of (1) determining vertical and horizontal gradient profiles perpendicular to the strike of a 2-D gravity anomaly, (2) determining the structural geometry from the gradient space plot, and (3) locating profile positions of structural corners from the vertical gradient profile. This generalized inversion procedure requires no quantitative information or assumption regarding density contrasts. Iterative forward modeling then predicts the density contrasts. Application of this generalized gravity gradient inversion procedure to high quality gravity data results in an effective density prediction consistent with measured near‐surface densities and the known increase in density with depth in deep sedimentary basins.


Geophysics ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 118-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. J. S. Grauch ◽  
Lindrith Cordell

The horizontal‐gradient method has been used since 1982 to locate density or magnetic boundaries from gravity data (Cordell, 1979) or pseudogravity data (Cordell and Grauch, 1985). The method is based on the principle that a near‐vertical, fault‐like boundary produces a gravity anomaly whose horizontal gradient is largest directly over the top edge of the boundary. Magnetic data can be transformed to pseudogravity data using Fourier techniques (e.g., Hildenbrand, 1983) so that they behave like gravity data; thus the horizontal gradient of pseudogravity also has maximum magnitude directly over the boundary. The method normally is applied to gridded data rather than to profiles. The horizontal‐gradient magnitude is contoured and lines are drawn or calculated (Blakely and Simpson, 1986) along the contour ridges. These lines presumably mark the top edges of magnetic or density boundaries. However, horizontal‐gradient magnitude maxima (gradient maxima) can be offset from a position directly over the boundary for several reasons. Offsets occur when boundaries are not near‐vertical, or when several boundaries are close together. This note predicts these offsets. Many other factors also cause offsets, but they are less straightforward and usually are only significant in local studies; we discuss these factors only briefly.


2006 ◽  
Vol 59 (3) ◽  
pp. 275-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hakim Saibi ◽  
Jun Nishijima ◽  
Essam Aboud ◽  
Sachio Ehara

2021 ◽  
Vol 54 (2C) ◽  
pp. 13-28
Author(s):  
Kawtar Benyas

The analysis of the magnetic signatures and gravity gradient values of the Rehamna Massif south of the Moroccan Western Meseta by using Geosoft Oasis Montaj 7.0.1 software, allowed us to detect several useful anomalies to be exploited and which are related to magmatic bodies and structural features within the study area. These data were analyzed by applying several techniques, including the horizontal gradient filters combined with the first vertical derivative. Subsurface structures; such as geological boundaries, faults, dykes and folds, were visualized as lineaments on geophysical maps, then results were compared with structural features provided by previous studies in the region. Thus, the Rehamna Massif structural map shows sets of linear features which may represent faults or boundaries of geological structures, which can be either faults or boundaries of geological structures, and they are mostly oriented in the directions: N-S, NNE-SSW, NE-SW, E-W with the predominance of the NNE-SSW to NE-SW directions. In addition, the super position of the minerals bearing beds or formations were distinguished from gravity and magnetic data processing results. Some of the recognized anomalies are related to the existence of precious metals which belong to the granitic bodies within the study area.


1998 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 545-550 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.J. Durrheim ◽  
G.R.J. Cooper

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document