Modification of cassava starch using combination process lactic acid hydrolysis and micro wave heating to increase coated peanut expansion quality

Author(s):  
Siswo Sumardiono ◽  
Isti Pudjihastuti ◽  
Bakti Jos ◽  
Muhammad Taufani ◽  
Faad Yahya
2018 ◽  
Vol 156 ◽  
pp. 01018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siswo Sumardiono ◽  
Bakti Jos ◽  
Denny Firmansyah ◽  
Rahmi Hidayatunajah ◽  
Isti Pudjihastuti

Food security should be supported in an effort to utilize local products into import substitution products. Cassava starch has the potential to be developed into semi-finished products in the form of flour or starch which does not contain gluten but can inflate large baking process, potentially as a substitute for wheat flour-the main ingredient for making bread. The characteristic of the starch is influenced by the type of starch composition and structure. Natural starch has physicochemical properties i.e. a long time cooking and pasta formed hard. These constraints allow us to modify cassava starch by a combination of lactic acid hydrolysis and drying with rotary UV system. Modified cassava starch is expected to be used as a substitute for wheat flour. The aim of the research which is a combination of lactic acid hydrolysis and drying using a rotary UV system is to examine the optimum operating conditions in the drying process of starch hydrolysis with parameter the physicochemical and rheological properties of modified cassava starch. The initial process study is to hydrolyze cassava starch using lactic acid. Furthermore, hydrolyzed cassava starch is then dried using UV light in the rotary dryers system. There are a variety of changing variables, i.e. time of irradiation cassava starch-lactic acid hydrolysis products in the rotary UV light and air drying temperature. The research results show that modified starch has a better characteristic than the natural starch. From the analysis, the best point of swelling power, solubility and baking expansion is consequently 15.62 g/g; 24.19 %; 2.21 ml/gr. The FTIR result shows that there is no significant difference of the chemical structure because the starch modification only change the physical characteristics. From the SEM analysis, we can know that the size of the starch’s granule changes between the natural starch and the modified starch..


1995 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 126-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Figueroa ◽  
A.M. Davila ◽  
J. Pourquié

2006 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min-tian Gao ◽  
Makoto Hirata ◽  
Eiichi Toorisaka ◽  
Tadashi Hano

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siswo Sumardiono ◽  
Nindya I. Kusumawardani ◽  
Assalaam U. Abdurahman ◽  
A. Arland ◽  
Bakti Jos ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (9) ◽  
pp. 3969-3979
Author(s):  
Fernanda Corrêa Leal Penido ◽  
Carmen de Oliveira Goulart ◽  
Yara Cristina Fidelis Galvão ◽  
Carolina Vasconcelos Teixeira ◽  
Roseane Batitucci Passos de Oliveira ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 248 ◽  
pp. 116805 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siying Li ◽  
Yanlan Ma ◽  
Tengteng Ji ◽  
Dur E. Sameen ◽  
Saeed Ahmed ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document