The effect of losses on the quantum-noise cancellation in the SU(1,1) interferometer

2016 ◽  
Vol 109 (5) ◽  
pp. 051107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Xin ◽  
Hailong Wang ◽  
Jietai Jing
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 103040 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Zhang ◽  
E Knyazev ◽  
S Steinlechner ◽  
F Ya Khalili ◽  
B W Barr ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 034002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kurt Jacobs ◽  
Nikolas Tezak ◽  
Hideo Mabuchi ◽  
Radhakrishnan Balu

2015 ◽  
Vol 92 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Bariani ◽  
H. Seok ◽  
S. Singh ◽  
M. Vengalattore ◽  
P. Meystre

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel W. Gould ◽  
Min Jet Yap ◽  
Vaishali B. Adya ◽  
Bram J. J. Slagmolen ◽  
Robert L. Ward ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Tesfay Gebremariam ◽  
Ye-Xiong Zeng ◽  
Mojtaba Mazaheri ◽  
Chong Li

Author(s):  
J. Langmore ◽  
M. Isaacson ◽  
J. Wall ◽  
A. V. Crewe

High resolution dark field microscopy is becoming an important tool for the investigation of unstained and specifically stained biological molecules. Of primary consideration to the microscopist is the interpretation of image Intensities and the effects of radiation damage to the specimen. Ignoring inelastic scattering, the image intensity is directly related to the collected elastic scattering cross section, σɳ, which is the product of the total elastic cross section, σ and the eficiency of the microscope system at imaging these electrons, η. The number of potentially bond damaging events resulting from the beam exposure required to reduce the effect of quantum noise in the image to a given level is proportional to 1/η. We wish to compare η in three dark field systems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document