Magnetization reversal in magnetic dot arrays: Nearest-neighbor interactions and global configurational anisotropy

2016 ◽  
Vol 119 (20) ◽  
pp. 203901 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Van de Wiele ◽  
Samuele Fin ◽  
Matteo Pancaldi ◽  
Paolo Vavassori ◽  
Anandakumar Sarella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetization Reversal ◽  
Nearest Neighbor ◽  
Magnetic Dot

Investigation of the magnetization reversal of a magnetic dot array of Co/Pt multilayers

2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 5587-5593 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Krone ◽  
D. Makarov ◽  
A. Cattoni ◽  
G. Faini ◽  
A.-M. Haghiri-Gosnet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetization Reversal ◽  
Magnetic Dot

Observation of Superlattice Dislocations on Cube Planes in Ni3Al

1973 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. 174-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Oblak ◽  
W. H. Rand
Keyword(s):  
Nearest Neighbor ◽  
Antiphase Boundary ◽  
Nearest Neighbors ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Cross Slip ◽  
Octahedral Plane ◽  
Trapping Mechanism ◽  
Slip Traces

The energy of an a/2 <110> shear antiphase. boundary in the Ll2 expected to be at a minimum on {100} cube planes because here strue ture is there is no violation of nearest-neighbor order. The latter however does involve the disruption of second nearest neighbors. It has been suggested that cross slip of paired a/2 <110> dislocations from octahedral onto cube planes is an important dislocation trapping mechanism in Ni3Al; furthermore, slip traces consistent with cube slip are observed above 920°K.Due to the high energy of the {111} antiphase boundary (> 200 mJ/m2), paired a/2 <110> dislocations are tightly constricted on the octahedral plane and cannot be individually resolved.

Application of Lattice Imaging Techniques to Amorphous Films

1975 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. 8-9
Author(s):  
S. R. Herd ◽  
P. Chaudhari
Keyword(s):  
Nearest Neighbor ◽  
Random Network ◽  
Imaging Techniques ◽  
Network Models ◽  
Accurate Method ◽  
Direct Transmission ◽  
Lattice Imaging ◽  
Transmission Electron ◽  
Lattice Planes ◽  
Nearest Neighbor Distances

Electron diffraction and direct transmission have been used extensively to study the local atomic arrangement in amorphous solids and in particular Ge. Nearest neighbor distances had been calculated from E.D. profiles and the results have been interpreted in terms of the microcrystalline or the random network models. Direct transmission electron microscopy appears the most direct and accurate method to resolve this issue since the spacial resolution of the better instruments are of the order of 3Å. In particular the tilted beam interference method is used regularly to show fringes corresponding to 1.5 to 3Å lattice planes in crystals as resolution tests.

Determination of eddy current losses and hysteresis losses in magnetic circuits of electrical machines

2020 ◽  
pp. 54-58
Author(s):  
S. M. Plotnikov
Keyword(s):  
Eddy Current ◽  
Magnetization Reversal ◽  
Eddy Currents ◽  
Technical Problem ◽  
Electrical Machines ◽  
Eddy Current Losses ◽  
Hysteresis Losses ◽  
Magnetic Circuits ◽  
Core Losses ◽  
Reversal Frequency

The division of the total core losses in the electrical steel of the magnetic circuit into two components – losses dueto hysteresis and eddy currents – is a serious technical problem, the solution of which will effectively design and construct electrical machines with magnetic circuits having low magnetic losses. In this regard, an important parameter is the exponent α, with which the frequency of magnetization reversal is included in the total losses in steel. Theoretically, this indicator can take values from 1 to 2. Most authors take α equal to 1.3, which corresponds to the special case when the eddy current losses are three times higher than the hysteresis losses. In fact, for modern electrical steels, the opposite is true. To refine the index α, an attempt was made to separate the total core losses on the basis that the hysteresis component is proportional to the first degree of the magnetization reversal frequency, and the eddy current component is proportional to the second degree. In the article, the calculation formulas of these components are obtained, containing the values of the total losses measured in idling experiments at two different frequencies, and the ratio of these frequencies. It is shown that the rational frequency ratio is within 1.2. Presented the graphs and expressions to determine the exponent α depending on the measured no-load losses and the frequency of magnetization reversal.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document