Instability analysis of pointing accuracy and power imbalance of spherical hohlraum

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 052703 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao Duan ◽  
Changshu Wu ◽  
Wenbing Pei ◽  
Shiyang Zou
2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 114503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen Yi Huo ◽  
Jie Liu ◽  
Yiqing Zhao ◽  
Wudi Zheng ◽  
Ke Lan

Author(s):  
Mateus Avanci ◽  
davi souza ◽  
Leonardo Santos de Brito Alves ◽  
Rômulo Bessi Freitas

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisia Snyder

Sarah Scott's eighteenth-century novel Millenium Hall canvasses the role of gift-giving in the dynamics heteronormative-domestic, economic, and spiritual relationships. The pharmakon of the gift plays a central role in Scott's understanding of philanthropy, and the construction of her female-inhabited, female-run utopia. This article's principle occupation is to show that all instances of gift-giving in Millenium Hall create power-imbalances between the superior giver and the inferior receiver; however, Sarah Scott's female utopia constructs the most preferable type of subservience.


2021 ◽  
Vol 263 ◽  
pp. 113720
Author(s):  
Mohammad Amin Shahmohammadi ◽  
Mojtaba Azhari ◽  
Mohammad Mehdi Saadatpour ◽  
Hamzeh Salehipour ◽  
Ömer Civalek

2014 ◽  
Vol 48 (5/6) ◽  
pp. 1070-1091 ◽  
Author(s):  
François Anthony Carrillat ◽  
Alain d’Astous

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to contrast athlete endorsement vs athlete sponsorship from a power imbalance perspective when a scandal strikes the athlete. Design/methodology/approach – A first study was conducted with a probabilistic sample of 252 adult consumers where the type of brand–athlete relationship (endorsement or sponsorship) and the level of congruence between the two entities (low or high) were manipulated in a mixed experimental design. A second study with a probabilistic sample of 118 adult consumers was conducted to demonstrate that consumers perceive that the balance of power between the brand and the athlete is not the same in endorsement and sponsorship situations. Findings – The results of the first study showed that when an athlete is in the midst of a scandal, the negative impact on the associated brand is stronger in the case of an endorsement than in the case of a sponsorship. However, this occurs only when the brand–athlete relationship is congruent. The results of the second study showed that the athlete’s power relative to the brand is greater in an endorsement than in a sponsorship context. Research limitations/implications – The findings suggest that a company that worries about the possibility that the athlete with whom it wants to build a relationship be eventually associated with some negative event (e.g. a scandal) should consider sponsorship rather than endorsement as a strategy. Originality/value – This study is the first to compare the athlete endorsement and sponsorship strategies in general and the first to put forward the notion of power imbalance in brand–athlete partnerships, its impact on how the two entities are represented in consumers’ memory networks and the consequences on brand attitude when the athlete is associated with a negative event.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document