scholarly journals A new equation of state of a flexible-chain polyelectrolyte solution: Phase equilibria and osmotic pressure in the salt-free case

2015 ◽  
Vol 142 (17) ◽  
pp. 174901 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu. A. Budkov ◽  
A. L. Kolesnikov ◽  
N. Georgi ◽  
E. A. Nogovitsyn ◽  
M. G. Kiselev
Ionics ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 2447-2459 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. M. Alavianmehr ◽  
F. Akbari ◽  
R. Behjatmanesh-Ardakani

2020 ◽  
Vol 125 (26) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Yasuda ◽  
Naoyuki Sakumichi ◽  
Ung-il Chung ◽  
Takamasa Sakai

2006 ◽  
Vol 23 (12) ◽  
pp. 1709-1728 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R. Jackett ◽  
Trevor J. McDougall ◽  
Rainer Feistel ◽  
Daniel G. Wright ◽  
Stephen M. Griffies

Abstract Algorithms are presented for density, potential temperature, conservative temperature, and the freezing temperature of seawater. The algorithms for potential temperature and density (in terms of potential temperature) are updates to routines recently published by McDougall et al., while the algorithms involving conservative temperature and the freezing temperatures of seawater are new. The McDougall et al. algorithms were based on the thermodynamic potential of Feistel and Hagen; the algorithms in this study are all based on the “new extended Gibbs thermodynamic potential of seawater” of Feistel. The algorithm for the computation of density in terms of salinity, pressure, and conservative temperature produces errors in density and in the corresponding thermal expansion coefficient of the same order as errors for the density equation using potential temperature, both being twice as accurate as the International Equation of State when compared with Feistel’s new equation of state. An inverse function relating potential temperature to conservative temperature is also provided. The difference between practical salinity and absolute salinity is discussed, and it is shown that the present practice of essentially ignoring the difference between these two different salinities is unlikely to cause significant errors in ocean models.


1928 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. 229 ◽  
Author(s):  
James A. Beattie ◽  
Oscar C. Bridgeman

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oluwakemi Victoria Eniolorunda ◽  
Antonin Chapoy ◽  
Rod Burgass

Abstract In this study, new experimental data using a reliable approach are reported for solid-fluid phase equilibrium of ternary mixtures of Methane-Carbon-dioxide- n-Hexadecane for 30-73 mol% CO2 and pressures up to 24 MPa. The effect of varying CO2 composition on the overall phase transition of the systems were investigated. Three thermodynamic models were used to predict the liquid phase fugacity, this includes the Peng Robison equation of state (PR-EoS), Soave Redlich-Kwong equation of state (SRK-EoS) and the Cubic plus Association (CPA) equation of state with the classical mixing rule and a group contribution approach for calculating binary interaction parameters in all cases. To describe the wax (solid) phase, three activity coefficient models based on the solid solution theory were investigated: the predictive universal quasichemical activity coefficients (UNIQUAC), Universal quasi-chemical Functional Group activity coefficients (UNIFAC) and the predictive Wilson approach. The solid-fluid equilibria experimental data gathered in this experimental work including those from saturated and under-saturated conditions were used to check the reliability of the various phase equilibria thermodynamic models.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document