scholarly journals Core turbulence behavior moving from ion-temperature-gradient regime towards trapped-electron-mode regime in the ASDEX Upgrade tokamak and comparison with gyrokinetic simulation

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 032503 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Happel ◽  
A. Bañón Navarro ◽  
G. D. Conway ◽  
C. Angioni ◽  
M. Bernert ◽  
...  
1988 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 1053-1073 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Rogister ◽  
G. Hasselberg ◽  
F.G. Waelbroeck ◽  
J. Weiland

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 122501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huarong Du ◽  
Hogun Jhang ◽  
T. S. Hahm ◽  
J. Q. Dong ◽  
Z. X. Wang

2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 022503 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Ansar Mahmood ◽  
T. Rafiq ◽  
M. Persson ◽  
J. Weiland

2016 ◽  
Vol 82 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
H. S. Xie ◽  
Y. Xiao ◽  
I. Holod ◽  
Z. Lin ◽  
E. A. Belli

Global, first-principles study of the kinetic ballooning mode (KBM) is crucial to understand tokamak edge physics in high-confinement mode (H-mode). In contrast to the ion temperature gradient mode and trapped electron mode, the KBM is found to be very sensitive to the equilibrium implementations in gyrokinetic codes. In this paper, we show that a second-order difference in Shafranov shift or geometric coordinates, or a difference between local and global profile implementations can bring a factor of two or more discrepancy in real frequency and growth rate. This suggests that an accurate global equilibrium is required for validation of gyrokinetic KBM simulations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document